2011.06.02 TRIAL Day Eight (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #681
misstatements against 'the defendants council of choice' (that would be you JB).
 
  • #682
I think dude actually has a point for once
 
  • #683
"mis-statements of fact" Isn't that a lie? :waitasec:
 
  • #684
JB understands the state wants them introduced because of the misstatements in them. However, he feels they should be relevant and not overly prejudicial and should not confuse the jury.
 
  • #685
JMO but if the defendant's counsel could possibly obstruct justice it's relevant evidence.

Gosh, your client talks so much.
 
  • #686
JB missed his deadlines to object to these videos.
 
  • #687
Not overly prejudicial? Oh boy!
 
  • #688
Baez says paraphrased that there are many other videos with unfair representation of the defendant's counsel of choice... MAKE 'EM STOP!!! (that last bolded part was just me)

:)
 
  • #689
Talk about pot calling the kettle black. JB: 'There are mis-statements of fact and law....'
 
  • #690
  • #691
He has to ask...
I sure would, every chance I got...
 
  • #692
Is the jury in the room?
 
  • #693
  • #694
JB should have brought up these points months ago
 
  • #695
Come on JB, it is what it is! Nobody can make you look bad but you!
 
  • #696
:boohoo: JB objecting to jail house tapes ...
 
  • #697
he can't even look at the judge..he looks down or straight but not where the judge is sitting
 
  • #698
I must have missed he asked this morning? Why is my stomach churning?
 
  • #699
  • #700
judge can just add a stipulation before the video to disregard those comments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
1,493
Total visitors
1,604

Forum statistics

Threads
632,359
Messages
18,625,273
Members
243,110
Latest member
dt0473
Back
Top