2011.06.08 TRIAL Day Thirteen (Afternoon Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
And it's important to note that the witness testified that these WERE NOT searches, but auto generated links that came from the initial searches on chloroform. You click on one, and then more are generated that are "like" the one you just clicked on. So chloroform will link to suffocation/inhalation, that link will link to something else, and so on and so on.

Since a lot of these were auto generated I don't' think this is the slam dunk many were expecting.

Good point. Although it's still damaging, it's not as powerful as if she had manually typed all these terms.
 
KC had to be told to put down the papers while the jury came in.

so busy.PNG
 
And it's important to note that the witness testified that these WERE NOT searches, but auto generated links that came from the initial searches on chloroform. You click on one, and then more are generated that are "like" the one you just clicked on. So chloroform will link to suffocation/inhalation, that link will link to something else, and so on and so on.

Since a lot of these were auto generated I don't' think this is the slam dunk many were expecting.

Not all of them. He testified that someone physically typed in searches for "chloroform", "alcohol", and "inhalation".
 
I really believe he's talking about the ADS and TRACKING DEVICES as being auto-generated. User activity vs. auto generated.
 
facebook user activity through bookmark - acessed 8 times thru 16
;54
 
More "auto generated add tracking urls to the history".
Then a Facebook url accessed by hyperlink perhaps saved as a bookmark. User activity, not autogenerated. Visited 8 times.
Autogenerated item, can't explain what it is but can see words; "view" and "MSN".
 
I hope LDB was given feedback from her team that she needs to make this clearer, more understndable and to tie it all together for us.
 
Wonder if/when it will begin to dawn on the DT (if it hasn't already) the true nature of what it is they are attempting to defend <shivers>
 
Remember, the jury gets to look over all this in deliberations, and there are three (?) IT guys to the jury. I think they will ultimately understand perfectly.
 
I really wish we could see what he's referring to when he's pointing and saying, "This generated this.. this generated that..." etc. It's frustrating not being able to see what he's talking about.
 
I hope LDB was given feedback from her team that she needs to make this clearer, more understndable and to tie it all together for us.

I agree. I was not trying to be argumentative with anyone earlier, but I think the way this is being presented (manual, autogenerated, etc.) is not being clarified enough in terms of what the SA is trying to accomplish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
185
Guests online
1,277
Total visitors
1,462

Forum statistics

Threads
625,865
Messages
18,512,104
Members
240,860
Latest member
malorealeyes
Back
Top