Wyle_E_Coyote
Northern Virginia
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,109
- Reaction score
- 7,784
I didn't think proof of identity for extradition purposes worked like that... I thought the proof of identity was "this person in custody is not cww", rather than "cww has an alibi and SODDI"Right, but the MO attorney was representing CWW in the extradition matter. A Missouri case. IMO, the MO attorney was planning to argue improper identification at the extradition hearing; that FL did not have "proof of identity" fingerprints, photos, placing CWW in the state at the time of the crime. This is a very relevant argument to be made at the extradition hearing. If the MO attorney had a particularly strong argument, a MO judge may have delayed/denied extradition. Might have been an attempt to probe the evidence against CWW.
If CWW retained private attorneys in FL, I wonder where the money came from. IMO, CWW will end up with court appointed counsel in FL.
But I'm not an atty... I dunno...
If I have time later I will ask in the legal Q&A thread.
Eta... which is why no one ever wins that argument fighting extradition. ..
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk