FL is an "equitable distribution" state. Generally speaking, assets are divided "equitably" by a judge who considers the length of the marriage, the amount earned or earning potential of each, assets, whether or not that spouse supports children as the custodial parent. In my state, the issue of spousal support is relevant in determining "equitable distribution" of the assets.
After a very brief research session, I now know that FL has two types of discretionary spousal support, permanent or rehabilitative (short term). IMO, MS would absolutely argue he's at least entitled to rehabilitative alimony. MS, presumably would no longer be employed by TS's business and may have succeeded with obtaining temporary support.
Specially a FL judge would consider:
-the standard of living established while married;
-the length of the marriage;
-the age and health of each party;
-the financial resources and assets of each party;
-when applicable, the time necessary for either party to acquire sufficient education or training to enable such party to find appropriate employment;
-the contribution of each party to the marriage, including, but not limited to, services rendered in homemaking, child care, education, and career building of the other party:stormingmad:; and
-all sources of income available to either party.