D
Deleted member 718
Guest
Maybe the video isn't clear enough to tell the difference.But the car BK drove is so similar to a 2011-2013 model that even the FBI forensic expert inaccurately deduced it was a 2011-2013, per the PCA.
Maybe the video isn't clear enough to tell the difference.But the car BK drove is so similar to a 2011-2013 model that even the FBI forensic expert inaccurately deduced it was a 2011-2013, per the PCA.
That makes the most sense to me. The specialists did the job they were asked to do and in the absence of knowing anything against them, they did it well IMO. The videos were clear enough for a specialist with all the resources that he/she needed available to them to identify make, model, colour, approximate year range and in some of the footage (depending on angle I would guess) that the front number plate was missing.MOO. If the specialist could have read a number plate he/she would have.MOO Not one of us, as far as I know, is in a position to know what quality of footage the specialist was dealing with, but they did identify a suspect vehicle that was consistent across mutiple sites on the night, approaching the King Road residence from the east (Indian Hills drive and Styner Ave) at c3.26 - 3.28 am and then doing 3x passes of the King Road residence between c.3.29am and 4.04am. On the fourth occasion the suspect vehicle enters Queen Street it does not leave untilc 4.20am. The defendant's vehicle is consistent with the description, the defendant's vehicle was south of Moscow at 4.48am, the defendants vehicle was caught on multiple video cameras from approx 5.25-5.30am on Johnson road, Bishop Rd and NE Stadium Way Pullman heading towards Steptoe Appartments. The defendant's vehicle was caught on video heading south in a direction consistent with leaving Pullman at approx 2.53am. The defendant's phone was pinging of towers utilised by King Road at approx 9am Nov 13th for about 10 minutes before returning to Steptoe appartments.Maybe the video isn't clear enough to tell the difference.
I accidentally wrote that post wrong and went back and edited it.I'm not ignoring circumstantial evidence. I'm considering it and saying I think it's weak. That's not the same as ignoring it.
@Sister Golden HairI would also think that if LE had BARD, they wouldn't have needed to call in two AGs for the case. Seems to me there's a lot more work ahead jmo
Library is open until 2 AM early on a Monday morning? Wow.
And lots of parties on a Sunday night? I guess that's how some university communities roll.
Small university towns I've lived in have had local ordinances about Sundays (Moscow is known to be way more conservative in these matters, IMO, than Pullman).
But sure, some hearty souls could stay up late for their own reasons on a school night. Appears that it did not improve BK's temperament vis-à-vis his students. It really is amazing he could keep such late hours and be...personable and well-prepared for his teaching duties (if he was, ever).
This is all speculation, and we're not going to know much until end of June.
IMO.
| Monday - Thursday | 6:00am - 2:00am |
| Friday | 6:00am - 8:00pm |
| Saturday | 12:00pm - 6:00pm |
| Sunday | 12:00pm - 2:00am |
| Monday - Friday | 8:00am - 8:00pm |
| Saturday | Closed |
| Sunday | 12:00pm - 8:00pm |
What I was trying to do was see if there was any other mention of model years. I thought maybe the request to the other agencies would have specified the year, to deduce WHEN the model years expanded. But it didn't note the years on the request made on Nov 25th (in the PCA).I vaguely recalled that MPD requested agencies to lookout for elantras, so I went back to the PCA to check if they mentioned years in that request:
On Nov 25th MPD requested law enforcement agencies to be on the look out for white elantras in the area.
No year given in the PCA description of that request.
Four days later a WSU PO queried white elantras at WSU and found a 2015.
JMO
This! Very Interesting.The police were aware that BK was a suspect by 11/29.
They issued the appeal for a 2011-13 Elantra on 12/7.
Sounds like they wanted to see
If they could get info without specifically targeting BK.
That sounds much more like university towns I know. I've mostly lived in the south and parts of the country (like Idaho) could be more conservative than the southern US, I suppose. But in towns I've lived in with universities I've never known Sunday nights to be terribly quiet. Quieter than Thurs, Fri, and Sat nights, for sure, but hardly quiet. I've also lived in towns where the main undergraduate library and certain computer labs were open 24/7. That was pre-Covid and it may not be that way now. But it doesn't surprise me at all that places would be open and for BK to be out and about after 11pm on a "school night." And I doubt he was the only one.Semester Hours
August 22 - December 16, January 9 - May 12
Monday - Thursday 6:00am - 2:00am Friday 6:00am - 8:00pm Saturday 12:00pm - 6:00pm Sunday 12:00pm - 2:00am Summer Hours
May 15 - August 21
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 8:00pm Saturday Closed Sunday 12:00pm - 8:00pm
![]()
Hours
As Idaho's flagship research library, the University of Idaho Library connects our users with information, ideas, tools, and spaces; enriches formal and informal learning opportunities; supports and advances research, scholarly, and creative activity; builds partnerships through regional and...www.lib.uidaho.edu
Yes, the library is open until 2AM Monday morning during the semester.
Club hours of the one prominent club in this case:
Our place is open from 10 am to 2 am through the week
![]()
IMO Students find all sorts of reasons/places/times to congegate and socialize.
It looks like it was directed to the Office of the Registrar at WSU. So could be about when BK was no longer registered as a student, or about his grades in the fall semester, or other issues that would be under the responsibilities of the Registrar.
I was thinking something sensitive too and something that would be related to the defendant getting a fair trial. JMOBut why completely seal the warrant and affidavit? Why not just seal the affidavit and redact the warrant as they did on so many others? IDK but I think it's something more sensitive esp since the grades and other records would be about BK and they left his name on everything else.
I did not realize that the court was engaging motions and providing additional extensions in the original post of the warrant!I believe those warrants are linked. I'll see if I can find my original info.
Yes, I did notice. Judge Marshall sealed it the first time for all the reasons in the motion which cited the statute and then cited ICAR 32(i)(2) in the final. Those are two different things. Without knowing more, I would not want to assume anything more than just what is there. All we know is that there was a discussion and she kept it sealed for that reason.
Editing to add: I broke down the others for why they were sealed, and based on those that were fully sealed, there were more reasons. Because this one was for WSU, perhaps it didn't actually contain the personal/sensitive/risky information that the others did, but she still kept it sealed for fair trial. My curiosity wonders which of the attorneys wanted it unsealed -- that to me is the much more interesting piece. What do you think?
I have been bookmarking and following your search warrant analysis and connections since the beginning. I have to admit that after a time, my brain locks and gets all muddled, so I have to proceed with small doses at a time. I don't have a clear overall picture yet, but I am working on it. MOOI found it back in #77:
https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/case/CR29-22-2805/030723%20Order%20to%20Seal%20-%20Washington%20State%20University.pdf
Dropbox anonymous and warrant dated 1.25.2023
BK Tinder 6.1.2022. Warrant dated 1.25.23 (same date as DropBox)
BK Yik Yak 6.1.2022 (edited to add). Warrant dated 1.25.23 (same date as DropBox)
I have always believed dropbox was linked to the other two warrants but I assumed and missed the first step. I hate it when that happens This is potentially something / someone at WSU supplied a key to previously unknown stuff.
Of course, this is IMO what potentially could be linked, but it would make sense because Dropbox, Tinder, YikYak all came out of seemingly nowhere and there'd be no obvious reason to completely seal a warrant for WSU. Redact yes, seal - not so much - unless it contained something meaningful imo.
Two AG's?
@Sister Golden Hair
People are responding.
I'm puzzled about posts responding to ^ (giving reason for two PDs),
and I see your ref to two AGs as deputy atty's general.
Anyway, imo, ALL that evd. triggers need for extra support.
Seems even the June hearing will be unusually long.
And the trial? Holy cow. Only one pros. atty? Nope.
Sorry if already noted, discussed.
________________________
* "Latah County Prosecuting Attorney."*
** tweet w pdf of Bill Thompson petition to court re apptmt of 2 Special Asst. Atty's Gen. for this case. Also ct order granting.Prosecuting Attorney
Latah County is located in the northern Idaho panhandle; to the immediate west lies Whitman County, Washington. These counties are referred to as The Palouse, which produces a large share of the wheat, lentils, peas, oats and barley in the United States. The Palouse is home to two major...latahcountyid.gov
Very well said...I would add also that if someone is wrongfully convicted the person(s) that did are still free to do it again. IMOI don't think infidelity is at all the same. People leave relationships just based on a hint of their partner being unfaithful, but no one goes to prison and no one dies. If they're wrong? It sucks, but life goes on. Murder charges are a whole different thing and if you get the wrong guy (or the right guy who's erroneously charged with the wrong thing), there are far-reaching ramifications that affect not only that person, but the victims' families and society at large. There's a reason we ask for unanimous verdicts to convict. There's a lot at stake and two people can interpret the same exact evidence differently.
MOO.
You very well maybe right about the videos etc, but I dont think anyone here was suggesting that the Defense was going to build their entire case on the Elantra miss info. At least for me and the way I read the other posts the Elantra situation was just the subject of that one discussion. MOOIMO, I have a hard time believing prosecutors build an entire case off of bullet point #2.
Maybe the video isn't clear enough to tell the difference.
I was thinking something sensitive too and something that would be related to the defendant getting a fair trial. JMO
Maybe it is about the altercations with the professor? Why he was let go from his TA position? Or the student complaints?
MOO
Apparently there are multiple videos, including the one of the three-point turn, so seems like with all those angles and all that technology, it seems like they'd be able to zero in. IDK and ICBW. I still find it a point of interest.Excellent point, and if that's the case, that's an argument in favor of the defense, IMO.
I believe Idaho law requires that each possible DP defendant have TWO lawyers. It's true in many states (ergo there are two attorneys for Letecia Stauch).
In Idaho, both attorneys must be DP qualified.
IIRC.
I agree. The only other real difference I saw was the color of the grill and I don't know how many versions of that car were available. Some vehicles have all kinds of trim options so, at this point, I don't know if that was simply a different trim option or an actual difference between the model years.MOO other than hubcaps I couldnt see much difference. What do you see as the visible differences?
I looked in Car Gurus to familiarize myself with the Elantra and looked at a lot of them, MOO seemed to me the 2015 was almost indistinguishable.
Totally agree. The Elantra is one piece. The totality of the evidence is considered but the individual pieces of evidence are used to chip away at the totality. If enough of the evidence or if any piece of it that it paramount to the case has enough chipped away, then reasonable doubt comes into play. The Elantra situation is one potential chip IMO.You very well maybe right about the videos etc, but I dont think anyone here was suggesting that the Defense was going to build their entire case on the Elantra miss info. At least for me and the way I read the other posts the Elantra situation was just the subject of that one discussion. MOO