outofstatelawyer
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 610
- Reaction score
- 0
Who says an Arias "meltdown" in court would cause a mistrial? If that were true, defendants would be having meltdowns in every court, every day.
I hope this isn't against the rules to post, but I did find some of this SOOO funny when I saw it last night.
Mods please remove if this not allowed or inappropriate.
Nancy Grace on Jodi Arias Trial - YouTube
I hope this isn't against the rules to post, but I did find some of this SOOO funny when I saw it last night.
Mods please remove if this not allowed or inappropriate.
Nancy Grace on Jodi Arias Trial - YouTube
I also think HLN's 10pm show is bogus. They are truly capitalizing on Travis' murder for ratings. As for Nancy Grace, she lost all credibility with me with the Duke Lacrosse case. She will need botox soon, for all her deep furrows from her "angry" look. Wasn't she disbarred or somethind? No need to answer, it's totally off topic. NG gets on my nerves. I have great respect for Beth K. She is objective & factual. No histrionics.
Do you think SLN's producers are looking for this guy? Oh yeah!I hope this isn't against the rules to post, but I did find some of this SOOO funny when I saw it last night.
Mods please remove if this not allowed or inappropriate.
Nancy Grace on Jodi Arias Trial - YouTube
THANK YOU for this clarification! At lunch we were making our fantasy list of who might be those 15.I do wonder how many he has though.
The one we were most discussing was the possibility of Matt McCartney. Thoughts?
No, Nancy Grace was not disbarred. There was an appellate case where the court criticized her behavior in court. When you try a lot of cases, and when you are passionate, that could happen. It's happened to Kelly Seigler too. I happen to love Nancy Grace. You have to understand that she is playing a role, just like Jinkasaurus. Beth Karas is the straight man (woman).
I personally hope she has a meltdown right in the middle of the trial so we can all see it. Im sure, however, it will be premeditated to continue to try and get sympathy on her behalf. I would like her to "snap" and really show her out of control emotions. :floorlaugh:
Would that cause a mistrial???
Would that cause a mistrial???
I don't know but my answer would be that she loves her daughter, but she is sorry for Travis' family. Supporting her daughter doesn't mean thinking her daughter is right or justified. Jodi is her trial. I wish they'd make ribbons for her poor mother, who has to continue to be Jodi's mother no matter if her child committed a heinous crime.
I really have no idea on that! I didn't even see that until someone sent me the youtube of it myself. I was more thinking she was showing him something she'd written herself in her own notes? She sure seemed ticked off to me and I didn't get the feeling she was too jazzed about ALV. A whole day without discussing her? That had to just kill her/give her a fauxgraine. My new word.![]()
totally agree with you. If she does have meltdown in court, it will be premeditated and when the jury is present. As you said, so the whole thing will start over again with a new jury. Something to watch for.
From what I've observed Jodi's mom or aunt haven't shown any sympathy for Travis's family. When you feel sorry for someone you don't roll your eyes and snicker at them much less when they are bawling their eyes out.
And, IMO, there are no excuses to explain why Jodi's family are wearing the DV ribbons. They're both adults with free will and no one is sticking a gun to their head to force them to wear those ribbons. Some claim that they're victims too but I'm not buying it. At what point since Jodi murdered Travis have any of them refused to contribute or participate in assisting Jodi's behavior? When Sandy was running around securing a getaway vehicle for Jodi? What about reporting that Jodi was preparing to flee, had a gun and knife in her possession, or details of Jodi's activities, behavior and discussions? Sure she's Jodi's mom but loving your child doesn't mean it's ok to enable behavior that is illegal, immoral, unethical and criminal. There are no excusable or justifiable explanations to defend Sandy's participation in attempting to sell those forged letters that portray Travis as a pedophile. IMO, when Sandy tried to sell those letters she was victimizing Travis AND his family. Hadn't his family and him suffered enough without trying to portray him as a pedophile? Sure I haven't been in Sandy's shoes but I don't need to in order to know how I would behave. My 3 kids aren't perfect and my two sons have severe ADHD and many times it would have been so much simpler and easier to have enabled their behaviors bc it would have made my life so much easier. But, I felt one of my greatest responsibilities was to hold them and their behaviors and choices accountable legally and morally. I'm not privy to what it was like raising Jodi but there is nothing, IMO, that justifies Sandy's enabling and passive aggressive behavior and makes me wonder if/how she contributed into Jodi developing into a full blown sociopath.
I won't go so far as to say I love NG, but I wil say right now she is the only one speaking out with passion for justice for Travis. jmo