We’ve been discussing the industry guidelines and good protocol and I think we mostly all agree that they were not followed on the Rust set. However, AFAIK, those guidelines are not actual “law” in Santa Fe or anywhere in New Mexico. It would be interesting to know if any state has such law for the film industry. Perhaps California, if anywhere.
Exactly - so glad you brought this up, because it's the most interesting part to me. Most of this case will be in civil courts, not criminal ones. Sure, there will likely be negligent homicide charges brought, but the civil cases are going to be...something else.
HH's husband has hired the top personal injury/wrongful death firm in California - the lawyer who took the case has the record for the highest judgment ever in a civil suit in CA ($2.2B against SoCalEdison).
Now, I figure the lawyer may go as high as $200,000,000 in the initial complaint, both to get it into the headlines, but as a serious attempt to get that much for his clients (father and son). There are several areas of loss that are typically compensated financially in wrongful death cases in CA. It could go higher (or it could settle out of court - but something tells me that's not gonna happen).
So who will be sued? All the production companies - but there may only be one that has even remotely deep pockets (the one owned by Baldwin). Specific individuals will likely be named as well, to include Alec Baldwin but also DH and possibly HGR. Alec has discussed his net worth in the past (on the Howard Stern show - let's just say that Howard likes to taunt Alec for being...unthrifty).
It could go on for years. Out of court settlements will almost certainly occur - but I don't think Baldwin has enough umbrella insurance to cover the demand and that it's really going to cost him, personally. A lot. That's probably just now sinking in, now that AB knows who is going to handle the civil lawsuit.
Corporations (production companies) can also be brought on criminal charges, so if a bunch of witnesses mention "plinking" and/or say that many people knew there was live ammo on the set...wowsa. Could get really really interesting, legally.
California currently requires a special permit (which must be purchased from the state) for any working firearms or sharp weapons to be on set. The permit holder is criminally liable for any misuse of a prop weapon (it can be used only as a prop weapon - it cannot fire live ammo or used to target practice on set). There is only one permit holder needed for a production (they can legally loan weapons to others for the sole purpose of using the weapon as a prop). The permit is good for one year - and so chief armorers in California are fingerprinted and know that their fingerprints are sent to the Feds as part of the permit process. I think CA is the only state with this requirement (hence very few...maybe zero...Westerns filmed here in recent times).
Some CA legislator is introducing legislation to ban real guns and ammunition (including blanks) from film sets in California - and apparently there are two other states (LA and GA) with legislators saying they want the same type of legislation, after HH's death.