re: protecting assets.
Do we think there are sizeable trusts for the 6 little kids? That would not be available for seizure.
Maybe AB & HB have solid financial advisors?
Trusts established before the incident would be safe from siezure as AB surrendered control of those assets prior to being sued.
Trusts established after the incident can be seized. Money or assets moved after one is sued, or even after one reasonably believes one is going to be sued can be Fraudulent Transfer, which is a crime. Fraudulent Transfers can be voided by a Court.
But....
The plaintiffs must find the fraudulent transfers and bring them to the attention of the Court. Then, the plaintiffs must prove fraudulent transfer and..... the Court must have the authority to actually seize the asset.
As for AB and HBs financial advisors, I imagine that what ever they were before the suit, they are top notch now. Thus, finding possible fraudulent transfers and then actually being able to seize them could get very difficult.
As a side note, Nevada trust attorneys advertise that Nevada's "privacy values" make identifying ownership difficult, and that Nevada requires Clear and Convincing proof of Fraudulent Transfer. Most importantly, a private entity uhmm.... "hostile force" has
never breached a Nevada trust that reached its two year maturation period.
Meanwhile, Wyoming trust attorneys brag that their state's new anonymity laws regarding trust ownership are essentially air tight. If so, this could make proving fraudulent transfer in /to Wyoming near impossible.
If the above talking points are true, it demonstrates that AB might not even need to go over seas to make possible transfers unidentifiable and beyond reach.