- Joined
- Oct 22, 2009
- Messages
- 7,184
- Reaction score
- 49,234
One thing I learned from watching all the coverage after this tragedy is that it doesn't appear that there really was much of an industry standard. I saw and read lots of interviews with directors and armorers and they were describing very different "standards". So there either isn't a real standard, or different directors/armorers just have very different interpretation of those standards.A film industry worker that I spoke to (camera operator) implied that actors are not required to take fire arms safety classes.
He did, however, state very strongly that all actors, directors etc are expected to follow fire arms protocols:
- Nobody other than the armorer issues a weapon to anybody. Nobody besides the armorer makes any kind of declaration about it.
- The armorer checks the weapon upon issuing it. The receiving actor then re-checks the weapon. If the receiving actor is not familiar with weapons, or is personally opposed to handling them more than absolutely necessary, they are assigned a "shooting partner". The actor's shooting partner then re checks the weapon for the actor.
He also stated that well run sets take the protocols to the extent that rubber guns are still weapons, are issued by the armorer, checked and rechecked.
I do think we will see a move to eliminate real firearms from movie productions as much as possible.