All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1

[LambChop]

Now tell me faefrost, have JB and CM underestimated MN's abilities as an attorney who seems to know his stuff or do they just enjoy the public humiliation. They should have stopped while they were ahead. jmo

 

[ThinkTank]

Nejame was professional and didn't sling any dirt. Just stated the facts.

That monitor should be a paralegal since he was astute enough to know to include the very important three words "At this time" on the doc that Mr. Mason requested he sign upon removing the 2 boxes that contained administrative docs. Way to think on the spot!

My favorite part was where he quoted Judge Strickland's infamous "At it's core, defense counsel's motion accuses the undersigned of being a self-aggrandizing media hound. Indeed. The irony is rich."

Muzikman, as always, you rock! :rocker: We heart you bunches around here. :blowkiss:

Ditto about the TES volunteer monitor!!! Mongo SMART! All CM or JB had to do was ask Ms Balani who was right there, or call MN about the 2 boxes in question -- they would have got the same answer - NOT in the Court Order - you cannot see the TES administrative records. Proud of the TES monitor for not being intimidated by CM's huffin and puffin!

 

[mom_in_il]

I think MN is asking for the extreme remedy ... knowing the Judge will compromise somewhere in the middle while avoiding appeal issues.

I really like that MN added a request to the Judge to not allow the release to the PUBLIC of ANY of the TES searcher names. That is what JB wants to do (along with doing background checks on every one of them). JB wants to find something resembling "dirt" on any of them and then shout it from the rooftops! JB wants to "Kronk" them!

So, even if Judge P. does allow the Defense to go ahead and review all 4,000 docs AGAIN, and tab some, and even if he releases any more than the 32 docs already given to the Defense, at least JB cannot do any sneaky stuff with the searcher's info PUBLICLY. If he tries to, he will get slammed by the Judge.

"Kronk" them, great term! Baez hasn't made a serious attempt to review any of the files since the whole debate started. I do agree that Judge Perry will probably strike a compromise, just because "death is different" as he is so quick to point out.

 

[ThinkTank]

Now tell me faefrost, have JB and CM underestimated MN's abilities as an attorney who seems to know his stuff or do they just enjoy the public humiliation. They should have stopped while they were ahead. jmo

You didn't ask me ... but just wanted to say that I think JB and CM think that if they throw enough 2-year old tantrums about this and make the Judge uncomfortable enough, he will just give in to their demands, just to bring a peaceful end to the matter. JB said in his Response that it would stop the bickering between the lawyers .....

 

[beach]

I think MN is asking for the extreme remedy ... knowing the Judge will compromise somewhere in the middle while avoiding appeal issues.

*snipped*

I totally agree. MN got his objections on the record and all of his points are valid, but HHJP is going to err on the side of insuring there are no appellate issues.


faefrost said it well here, too.

*snipped for subject matter*

To MN. Same thing. the judge is not going to seal your records completely from the defense. he does not want an appellate issue regarding access to evidence or even the whisper of potential evidence. He will not raise an appealable issue just to smack down JB and CM, no matter how rude annoying or just plain intolerable they may be. So once again the reasonable plan he came up with will stay in place. Yeah get your protests on the record, but once thats done, total up the costs, use the bad faith issue to drop a bill on Baez, and move along.

So, come on guys - review the docs and tab til your heart's content. Then HHJP can strike down all the ridiculous requests and we can get this show on the road. jmho

 

[Mrs G Norris]

So good.....

....and since they opened the door, this is what they should have done re; Casey....

...but they missed the opportunity, oh well. Just to ad insult to narcissic injury....

 

[beach]

Thanks Muzikman!

Hmmm? after reading through that MN has me sold on changing his orders and limiting the release to the 32 people in close proximity. if for no other reason that the defense is really in desperate need of a lesson that what they say in public in front of cameras counts. Still not sure if the judge will go for it, just to avoid even the inkling of an appellate issue.

Oops, sorry! I didn't see this post where you changed your mind before I quoted your earlier opinion. :blushing:

 

[LambChop]

Has this been scheduled for a hearing yet??? It would be interesting to find out why if it has not. I would not be surprised to see the judge withdraw the note taking and stick to just tabs. That way Judge Perry could review the tabbed records himself and see if this is, in fact, much ado about nothing..... jmo

 

[ThinkTank]

Has this been scheduled for a hearing yet??? It would be interesting to find out why if it has not. I would not be surprised to see the judge withdraw the note taking and stick to just tabs. That way Judge Perry could review the tabbed records himself and see if this is, in fact, much ado about nothing..... jmo

Has not been set for Hearing, that we know of.
I'm hoping the Judge will just make a ruling without a Hearing and be done with it. No more drama.
Even if they do take notes, they still have to let the Special Magistrate show the tabbed documents to Judge P for review, and they cannot go PUBLIC with any of the info from their note taking, without Court approval.
Just having the info does not fit into the defense strategy to trash some TES volunteers, PUBLICLY.

 

[LambChop]

So is anyone willing to bet that JB was burning the midnight oil last night writing another motion? There's still 5 minutes to file..... Happy Friday the 13th everyone.

P.S. When you volunteer for TES do you have to give your SS number????

 

[zoomom]

So is anyone willing to bet that JB was burning the midnight oil last night writing another motion? There's still 5 minutes to file..... Happy Friday the 13th everyone.

P.S. When you volunteer for TES do you have to give your SS number????

I bet you do. I was a Volunteer Administrator, and once someone was accepted as an "official"volunteer we asked for their ss#

 

[LambChop]

I bet you do. I was a Volunteer Administrator, and once someone was accepted as an "official"volunteer we asked for their ss#

BINGO....background checks. No attorney should have access to your SS# if they don't first have a suspicion about you. Just to flatly give out your SS#'s that is just so wrong.... jmo

 

[The World According]

THANK YOU MUZIKMAN!!

Nejame Reply to Defense Reply:

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/50221424/08122010-Nejame-Reply-to-Defense-Response-to-Motion-to-Quash

for Muzikman

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNQRfBAzSzo[/ame]


Wow, the judge is going to have a field day, I think he will rule in very short order. Unlike the defense he is not confused on the facts or confused on the law. He will be certain just what to do, that leaves no appeal issues.

 

[whiteangora]

I think it must have been very difficult for Mark NeJame to reply to JB in a dignified manner. The accusations hurled at him and the insinuations were so ridiculous but he managed to get his points across and not look like a spoiled child doing it.
I still think Judge Perry will allow the TES docs to be scrutinized just to err on the side of caution.
Although, this trial could be legally flawless and I do believe there will still be attempts at appeals.

 

[LambChop]

I think it must have been very difficult for Mark NeJame to reply to JB in a dignified manner. The accusations hurled at him and the insinuations were so ridiculous but he managed to get his points across and not look like a spoiled child doing it.
I still think Judge Perry will allow the TES docs to be scrutinized just to err on the side of caution.
Although, this trial could be legally flawless and I do believe there will still be attempts at appeals.

More victims added to the bottom of KC's list.

 

[countzero]

There just might be one long side bar conversation (read butt chewing, again) when these motions are heard.

Personally, I hope this one is done in camera and let the words fly.

 

[RR0004]

But wasn't Dominic also out searching November 7th and 8th (or there about)?

Ok...we know he searched at least 3x...and for some reason I thought it was a week earlier...was I dreaming? The only place I would have seen and/or discussed anything is right here. LOL
I'll try doing searches.

 

[ThinkTank]

Ok...we know he searched at least 3x...and for some reason I thought it was a week earlier...was I dreaming? The only place I would have seen and/or discussed anything is right here. LOL
I'll try doing searches.

I thought the 3 searchers were Nov 15th ... Nov 16th ... and then some day after that???

 

[ThinkTank]

Has not been set for Hearing, that we know of.
I'm hoping the Judge will just make a ruling without a Hearing and be done with it. No more drama.
Even if they do take notes, they still have to let the Special Magistrate show the tabbed documents to Judge P for review, and they cannot go PUBLIC with any of the info from their note taking, without Court approval.
Just having the info does not fit into the defense strategy to trash some TES volunteers, PUBLICLY.

quoting myself - sorry, just had another thought ....
also .... Mz Cindy blabbermouth will NOT be able to go on her media tours and spout TES volunteer names and insinuate nasty things about them, and George will not be able to say he has "questions" about those people! Cindy and George cannot do the defense's dirty work on this.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

Has not been set for Hearing, that we know of.
I'm hoping the Judge will just make a ruling without a Hearing and be done with it. No more drama.
Even if they do take notes, they still have to let the Special Magistrate show the tabbed documents to Judge P for review, and they cannot go PUBLIC with any of the info from their note taking, without Court approval.
Just having the info does not fit into the defense strategy to trash some TES volunteers, PUBLICLY.

Would the names be exempt from the Sunshine laws, then?