2009.09.30 Baez Motions-the missing Memos of Law/Exhibits

[RR0004]

My favorie part "at the close of all evidence". I think that was a heck of a good zinger! They know the defense was going fishing...wanted the SA to tip their hand. Not going to happen...and I can't wait for the "close".

 

[BeanE]

I do wonder what AL is saying to (or screaming at) JB behind closed doors.

 

[RR0004]

So I wonder if this was intended more just to fuel the renewed PR media campaign and confuse/taint the future Jury pool more than anything? :waitasec:

Let's look at the order of events:

1) State releases 1000 pages of docs.
2) JB files a Motion to Dismiss.
3) Defense takes to the airwaves.

How many billable hours do you think group has collectively racked up? IMO...time to feed the kitty.

 

[Kentjbkent]

So I wonder if this was intended more just to fuel the renewed PR media campaign and confuse/taint the future Jury pool more than anything? :waitasec:

I am not so sure there was a lot of thinking behind any of this. I think Baez is just doing what he *thinks* he is *supposed* to do, when in actuality, he has absolutely NO IDEA at all! Keep in mind, as an attorney, he has absolutely NO EXPERIENCE with filing motions, preparing for trial, etc.

His ONE previous case was (with Kasen) was the Nilton Diaz case. I just went to the Lake County court website to read that case docket again, to see how his "actions" in that case measure up to what he has done in THIS case!

Very interesting reading, as the judge in that case also reprimanded him for the same things Strickland has in this case, and there are tons of "no def atty present, with a few "def atty not present but on telephone" for hearings. VERY few motions even filed in that case, so I think this is Baez "virginal" motion filings!

I think AL has been very clear on exactly how much involvement she intends to put out for this case (DP if applicable only) and LBK just showing up for televised appearances.

Sad thing is, I assume most of us are in agreement that KC sure didn't attach herself to a "dream" this time, but what I am SURE about is that she is CHOOSING to stay attached to him. Hard to be sympathetic to that!


http://lakecountyclerk.org/online_court_records_detail.asp?case_id=78899567 (link to Diaz case if you are interested in reading)

http://www.lakecountyclerk.org/services.asp?subject=Online_Court_Records
(in case above link doesn't go directly....search Nilton J Diaz)

 

[Valhall]

Yes, you are correct. If they wanted this motion to succeed then they should have filed it BEFORE Caylee's remains were found. Once the remains were found, a MTD would not be very successful. But even then, even though they consider the trunk evidence "junk science" it would have been hard to have the case entirely dismissed. But they had a better shot. At this juncture until the defense gets expert reports of their own to refute the evidence this motion was filed too soon.

Well, more to the point, they must decide and swear to the trunk evidence NOT being "junk science" and then argue that running around with your daughter's dead body in your car does not implicate KC.

I can't wait for that motion.

 

[MD MOMMY]

My favorite part-"if and when Miss Anthony decides to swear to any or all material facts, the State of Florida will issue the response required..."

:woohoo:BOOYA!!!:woohoo:

Caylee's Angels - LDB and KB have struck again!!!:woohoo:

The should have added swear TRUTHFULLY..that would have been a riot and a fabulous play on words...of course they would have to have the letters capitalized for the effect.:dance: