All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1

[The World According]

CASEY ANTHONY: TIM MILLER SPEAKS OUT IN AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW
Steph Watts

<snip>
Speculation is swirling all over the Cable News Networks about what really went down when Texas Equusearch founder Tim Miller confronted Casey Anthony in her home about what she did with her daughter. Now audio tapes of Cindy Anthony threatening Miller have surfaced. Tim Miller will join me in an exclusive interview to set the record straight.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/watts-up-with-this

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raHlPVJEabU[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-P2NEQz17s[/ame]


Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Illinois cornfield USA
Posts: 11,150
Transcripts Released 3/23/10

Tim Miller Transcript From 12/12/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918226/detail.html


Richard Creque Transcript From 12/10/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918487/detail.html

Tony Rovinski Transcript From 12/10/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918504/detail.html

Lisa Hoffman Transcript From 12/12/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918231/detail.html

Linda Tinelli Transcript From 12/14/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918255/detail.html

Joseph Jordan #1 Transcript From 10/28/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918297/detail.html

Joseph Jordan #2 Transcript From 11/05/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918267/detail.html

Daniel Ibison Transcript From 12/10/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918302/detail.html

Carol Conaway Transcript From 9/16/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918310/detail.html

Jennifer Conaway Transcript From 9/16/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918358/detail.html

Brett Reilly Transcript From 12/10/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918362/detail.html

Brett Churchill Transcript From 8/21/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918425/detail.html

Lori Cree Transcript From 8/20/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918464/detail.html

Joy Wray Transcript From 11/23/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918573/detail.html

Joy Wray Transcript From 12/10/09
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918542/detail.html

Sheriff's Reports: Supplemental #1
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22919208/detail.html

Sheriff's Reports: Supplemental #2

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll7W9QRGo9Y[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk1Umu7GBVw[/ame]

Tim's interview with LE is very interesting. He talks about the first time they went to the Anthony's home, before the first search. He said that George went into Casey's room and brought her out to the table (where there was a map) and asked her to draw an X at the spot. Casey refused to do so and Cindy got mad throwing everyone out of the house.

The account of what went on in the A's home starts at about page 11...

Much more interesting info in the interview...

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22918226/detail.html

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

I also wonder how the jury will react to hearing that Baez would not allow his client to talk about Caylee or her alleged disappearance. I myself do not think it will go over well and will leave the jury with a very bad taste in their mouths. Inmate Anthony's non reaction to her allegedly missing child, may somehow prove to those jurors her guilt and her part in this. I also have said, the Anthony family should continue to do what they have been doing for it seems to me they have sabotaged Inmate Anthony whether consciously or unconsciously but they have, IMO..so let them keep on keeping on for they are the best witnesses for the prosecution...JMHO

The best that came of these interviews with the volunteers, prove that area was under water then and stood underwater for a long while (evidence will support this, IMO). I also feel TM will be the best witness for the prosectution since he's come upon thousands of people who have a missing loved one and never has anyone acted as this family did. Surely it will show the dynamics in that family and how far they are willing to go to cover up for their felonious child! I also have a feeling, we will see one or both of her parents under arrest either during the trial or immediately after.

I wonder what the statute of limitations would be for any charges coming down the pike. Murder has no statute of limitations, so I wonder if obstruction of justice, knowledge after the fact, etc...will also be no statute of limitations, this being a murder case. Would anyone know???

Justice for Caylee!

 

[rotterdam]

After reading Tim Miller/LE interview again ( as ref. in "The World according" tks), I am pretty well convinced now that Baez also knew Caylee was dead.
Frankly, I would not even put it past him, if he would have been instrumental by advising the grandparents to continue the myth that Caylee is alive, in order to save their worthless daughter.
And I also suspect the plan was to find Caylee's remains before LE. And kept the discovery quiet of course and/or mess around with the evidence like removing and/or planting evidence.
What a disgusting bunch of characters. All IMO of course.

 

[rotterdam]

I also wonder how the jury will react to hearing that Baez would not allow his client to talk about Caylee or her alleged disappearance. I myself do not think it will go over well and will leave the jury with a very bad taste in their mouths. Inmate Anthony's non reaction to her allegedly missing child, may somehow prove to those jurors her guilt and her part in this. I also have said, the Anthony family should continue to do what they have been doing for it seems to me they have sabotaged Inmate Anthony whether consciously or unconsciously but they have, IMO..so let them keep on keeping on for they are the best witnesses for the prosecution...JMHO

The best that came of these interviews with the volunteers, prove that area was under water then and stood underwater for a long while (evidence will support this, IMO). I also feel TM will be the best witness for the prosectution since he's come upon thousands of people who have a missing loved one and never has anyone acted as this family did. Surely it will show the dynamics in that family and how far they are willing to go to cover up for their felonious child! I also have a feeling, we will see one or both of her parents under arrest either during the trial or immediately after.

I wonder what the statute of limitations would be for any charges coming down the pike. Murder has no statute of limitations, so I wonder if obstruction of justice, knowledge after the fact, etc...will also be no statute of limitations, this being a murder case. Would anyone know???

Justice for Caylee!

I agree with your post. The jury surely will deduce that they did not want the remains to be found and all knew or were relatively convinced, Caylee was dead, Baez included, plus they strongly suspected who did it. They just went thru the motions for public appearance sake.
However, I do not think that the Anthony's will ever be arrested though. Parents will go to extremes to save a child, even a hideous murderous one. A jury would never convict them for protecting their daughter , even if employing gross deception/obstruction IMO.

 

[LolaMoon08]

However, I do not think that the Anthony's will ever be arrested though. Parents will go to extremes to save a child, even a hideous murderous one. A jury would never convict them for protecting their daughter , even if employing gross deception/obstruction IMO.

I respectfull disagree. There's a HUGE difference in loving and protecting their daughter and what they have done over the past, going on, two years. Which IMO, has gone WAY past simple obstruction of justice and teeters on accessory after the fact.

Especially if they did know Caylee was deceased (which I believe they did) and took money from a sympathetic public.

Especially if they sent DC out into those woods (which I believe at least Cindy did) looking for a deceased Caylee, only to tamper/destroy evidence.

Especially them calling LE, who were desperately looking for their precious granddaughter, liars and basically accusing them of framing their murderous daughter.

Add that they cleaned the car, washed clothes, gave the wrong brush and God only knows what else they have done.

We haven't even gotten to the trial yet, where they're sure to perjure themselves numerous times.

I don't think a jury, if they are ever charged, could not convict them with at least obstruction of justice.

 

[Angel Who Cares]

FYI: I believe this is the hearing for the motion being discussed in this thread! :wink:

If not could someone bump this article into the correct one! TIA

Hearing Slated In Casey Anthony Case
Defense Seeks Texas EquuSearch Records
POSTED: 4:35 pm EDT March 30, 2010
UPDATED: 5:07 pm EDT March 30, 2010
<snipped>
Casey Anthony is expected to return to the courtroom as her defense team seeks records they hope could prove her innocence.

Judge Stan Strickland scheduled a hearing for Monday morning.

The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m.

Article:
http://www.wesh.com/news/23003973/detail.html

:angel:

 

[ZsaZsa]

I agree with your post. The jury surely will deduce that they did not want the remains to be found and all knew or were relatively convinced, Caylee was dead, Baez included, plus they strongly suspected who did it. They just went thru the motions for public appearance sake.
However, I do not think that the Anthony's will ever be arrested though. Parents will go to extremes to save a child, even a hideous murderous one. A jury would never convict them for protecting their daughter , even if employing gross deception/obstruction IMO.

Couldn't disagree more. Juries convict people of aiding and abetting, harboring fugitives, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice all the time, regardless of relationship to the perp.
It is not acceptable to protect a child murderer, no matter whom.

 

[nort]

I just cant believe that they think this will matter, they did not find the body.. so what. Maybe her brother, mother, father, PI (the list goes on) moved it for her sometime through the whole ordeal (I personally believe it was there the whole time) I mean really? Nobody saw it so it was not there, so extremely frustrating. Since they are on a budget their time would be better spent in court with things that matter. UGH UGH and triple UGH

 

[autumnlover]

I also wonder how the jury will react to hearing that Baez would not allow his client to talk about Caylee or her alleged disappearance. I myself do not think it will go over well and will leave the jury with a very bad taste in their mouths. Inmate Anthony's non reaction to her allegedly missing child, may somehow prove to those jurors her guilt and her part in this. I also have said, the Anthony family should continue to do what they have been doing for it seems to me they have sabotaged Inmate Anthony whether consciously or unconsciously but they have, IMO..so let them keep on keeping on for they are the best witnesses for the prosecution...JMHO

The best that came of these interviews with the volunteers, prove that area was under water then and stood underwater for a long while (evidence will support this, IMO). I also feel TM will be the best witness for the prosectution since he's come upon thousands of people who have a missing loved one and never has anyone acted as this family did. Surely it will show the dynamics in that family and how far they are willing to go to cover up for their felonious child! I also have a feeling, we will see one or both of her parents under arrest either during the trial or immediately after.

I wonder what the statute of limitations would be for any charges coming down the pike. Murder has no statute of limitations, so I wonder if obstruction of justice, knowledge after the fact, etc...will also be no statute of limitations, this being a murder case. Would anyone know???

Justice for Caylee!

BBM. If KC had not committed a crime (and obviously JB knew she had) there would be no way in the world she wouldn't have assisted in the search for Caylee. There would be no such thing as "My lawyer told me not to speak." That being said, ITA that that behavior will not sit well with the jury and is highly incriminating and suspect in its own right.

As far as the statute goes for obstruction of justice of charges I'm dying to know the answer to that question. WS lawyers? Do you know? Thanks.

 

[Nore]

HOw can B. refuse to look at the files, now want copies? The Judge should just say no way J.. They are ridiculous.Do they honestly think people are that stupid?They should now concentrate on doing something constructive with the "Free money" instead of wasting more time.People are not going to forget!:banghead:
The Coronor stated the body appeared to have been there since June/July. She does not lie.

 

[The World According]

Hearing Slated In Casey Anthony Case
Defense Seeks Texas EquuSearch Records
POSTED: 4:35 pm EDT March 30, 2010
UPDATED: 5:07 pm EDT March 30, 2010
<snipped>
Casey Anthony is expected to return to the courtroom as her defense team seeks records they hope could prove her innocence.

Judge Stan Strickland scheduled a hearing for Monday morning.

The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m.

Article:
http://www.wesh.com/news/23003973/detail.html
__________________

 

[cyberborg]

I think the point of the motion to seek more TES records is that not only is it a fishing expedition but also they need to continaully advance a theory of other possibilities, other than KC.

They are creating fronts to pursue over time and one target is RK and the other is TES searchers and searching. They may ultimately lead nowhere but do feed perceptions to the public to counter the reality and truth.

Propaganda at its fundamental base.

 

[Reagan]

I'm confused. Why would they want a hearing requesting more docs when they canceled picking up these other ones? What's the point?

Or did they pick them up finally?

 

[CarolinaMoon]

I'm confused. Why would they want a hearing requesting more docs when they canceled picking up these other ones? What's the point?

Or did they pick them up finally?

When they didn't pick them up, NeJame had them hand-delivered to Baez' office!

I think NeJame's last motion says it all, in some very colorful adjectives and adverbs such as...

haphazardly filed motion...
spurious and unfounded motion...
frivolous motions...
inaccuracy...


http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22824888/detail.html

He also brings up the fact that JJ's name/records WERE among the 32 hand-delivered to his office and that LB states, in her affidavit, that she did not search the area with TES.

He mentions that the reason the appointment was cancelled was that Baez was sending people from a company to COPY the documents (and I'm assuming he ment ALL the records).

 

[The World According]

I'm confused. Why would they want a hearing requesting more docs when they canceled picking up these other ones? What's the point?

Or did they pick them up finally?

Hi Reagan,

As is common in this case, the defense has, or pretends to have a very poor understanding of the judge's ruling. Never did he say they may pick up the records of the four thousand searchers. He ruled that they would be given access to come to Mr. Nejame's office to REVIEW them ( not to copy or memorialize in any manner). The purpose of this was for the defense to satisfy themselves that indeed the 32 searchers Brad ( who by the way reviewed the records FOR DAYS) and Mr. Nejame had deemed to be within the general area of where Caylee's body was found, were the only relevant ones. Regarding those two thirty two searchers, Mr. Nejame had hand delivered their information to the defense some time ago.
Meanwhile, the defense made an appointment to come to review the remaining documents. Six months went by after the defense made the appointment and never showed up, and they still as we sit here today have not rescheduled. If they had done so and would have decided there were other searchers that were relevant, then they were to flag those pages, and all parties would go before the judge, the judge would rule if indeed he concurred and then and ONLY then would they be given those extra searcher's information to interview them. Key words again, review and the JUDGE WOULD DECIDE.

The defense has filed motions again requesting COPIES of the four thousand searcher's information. The defense tried to make an appointment for a copy company to come to Mr. Nejame's office, to COPY the documents. That is in direct contrast to what the judge had already ruled. At one point a reporter was interviewing a very frustrated Mr. Nejame to ask him just your very question. Mr. Nejame let the reporter casually flip through a copy of what was already supplied to the defense regarding the ORIGINALLY AGREED UPON 32 SEARCHERS. He did this on camera. He did not copy in any manner or take notes. The defense seemed to miss that detail. They feigned outrage, and filed a motion with the court that now that Mr. Nejmae gave the searcher's private information to the press, obviously the T E S argument that they are protecting their privacy is moot and they , the defense, therefore demanded once again the COPIES of the four thousand volunteers information.

Despite it being proved to the defense they misunderstood exactly what the reporter was and was not allowed to do, the defense did not retract their ridiculous assertion they put before the court, IN BAD FAITH.

If you were guessing, what do you think Mr. Nejame's (with thirty years of experience) reaction to this would be? He has asked the court to edify the defense and in explaining the error of their ways he has asked for them to be disciplined, sanctioned and fined the attorney fees the volunteer, non - profit Texas Equusearch has had to spend on this nonsense.

I am not a lawyer, but that is my understanding of the situation. In slang, we are going to have a smack down.
In my favorite words, Mr. Nejame is going to make short order of this and mop the floor with the defense.
Lastly....YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp-TNj55rls[/ame]

"He has caused unnecessary attorney time and Court time to be wasted, especially since he has been fully advised of its misrepresentations and inaccuracies and nevertheless continues to proceed," NeJame wrote.

BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis Of Evidence Released 02/16/10

http://www.wftv.com/video/22582915/index.html

He explained that it is clear the defense is still on a fishing expedition to muster up something to back up Todd's claims. "If they had the proof ...they would produce the exculpatory evidence required by the rules of procedure. That coupled with the fact that they keep going off into the area that they need the Texas Equusearch records....they are still fishing , trying to come up with something that they do not have, that they never did have . They missed their deadline. They have not produced their proof and that is because THEY DON'T HAVE IT!!" This whole defense response was entirely inappropriate"

 

[sleutherontheside]

IMO the Baez Law Firm was likely preoccupied with researching legal terminology and attempting to comprehend how it applies to this case. Additionally......they were probably required to update their membership to LexisNexis and West Law.com.

After they were able to free enough space on the corporate credit card (pre-paid card required a cash deposit) they were able to move forward.

 

[Searchfortruth]

This is all for show, a lame attempt to speak to the public and future jury. There is no way the defense will get all of the records, if they really wanted records they would have jumped at the chance they were offered, after JS's original ruling. How will Jose explain to Judge Strickland his reason for not picking up the 32 records he fought to get access to, when he went to court on this the last time ?

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

I think the point of the motion to seek more TES records is that not only is it a fishing expedition but also they need to continaully advance a theory of other possibilities, other than KC.

They are creating fronts to pursue over time and one target is RK and the other is TES searchers and searching. They may ultimately lead nowhere but do feed perceptions to the public to counter the reality and truth.

Propaganda at its fundamental base.

ITA. And what nerve they have since all the "fish" for their expedition were already offered up for their review. But they want more. They want the bait, nets and boat supplied, too. No . . . They'd prefer the fillets delivered to them ~ and on ice!!

How many times now has this very subject been brought before the court? And how many times will JS allow before he breaks instead of bending? I would guess (and hope) they are on his last nerve! 'Cuz they're sure on my last one. :furious:

 

[rotterdam]

I think the point of the motion to seek more TES records is that not only is it a fishing expedition but also they need to continaully advance a theory of other possibilities, other than KC.

They are creating fronts to pursue over time and one target is RK and the other is TES searchers and searching. They may ultimately lead nowhere but do feed perceptions to the public to counter the reality and truth.

Propaganda at its fundamental base.

Frankly, an ulterior motive could be present. I think defense is gathering material for future book. This would make another interesting chapter IMO, regardless of outcome of trial.

 

[The World According]

Maybe Cowboy Dan ( the new guy) is going to come in to court and say
he can keep that appointment with Mr. Nejame just as soon as the good folks at the JAC fund the little excursion.

Old and new personalities aside, I do think the Judge is going to right this ship and get everyone on track. I do not believe anyone will leave his hearing and not be crystal clear on what he rules. In his words, "This is gettin' old!"




ps. Don't anyone clobber me for my Cowboy Dan remark, I am only kidding. I am sure he is a lovely man, and again I live in and love, love, LOVE Texas.