All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1

[LiveLaughLuv]

http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/0809_ExhibitC.pdf

MN sets CA straight...this woman can turn a lie like she turns a key into her door. She has no humiliation, she feels no embarassment as long as she sets ICA free..MN, should write a book on Contrary Cindy Anthony...she is NOT searching for the truth of what truly happened to Caylee as he points out to her in his email response. CA doesn't care who she hurts since she is hurt herself. I remember when CA told one of the detectives, I know where KC's at and I don't care if she spends the rest of her life there, I only want to find Caylee...well, Caylee was found, all evidence points to her daughter, yet she will slander good people, she ruins reputations, she belittles, she demeans, anything negative, she's has no problems doing. But don't dare do this to her! What a hipocrit...like MN wants to represent ICA...he pointed out the the Anthony's many times, how incompetent Jose is, yet they take it as if he wanted to represent ICA...not a snowballs chance in hell would he. If he had, he'd probably plead her guilty...JMHO

Justice for Caylee

 

[LiveLaughLuv]

I believe the state just put the defense in check (as in a game of chess) after the emails with DC came forward. All excuses the defense was using was just thwarted out for the BS it is...so the defense has nothing else to do but knock TES and his representative...:furious: JMHO

 

[Intermezzo]

I'm still baffled that they keep thinking that MN wanted to represent ICA....I never got that in any of his interviews way back when...if anything he KNEW --- He just didn't know how long it would take his clients to realize the truth of the matter. He always stated he was for Caylee---NEVER would help out on ICA....

This is getting to be a tad on the tadbloid journalism side rather than the murder of a child...:furious: I do hope for a smak down by either HHJP or JAC....:furious:

BBM
Yes, I agree.
MN always stated openly he would not represent Casey and never help out Casey's defense.
MN, if you have watched or read any media interview, always stood up and spoke up for G&A, if they were being unfairly judged on an issue MN fired back and defended them..and he never defended Casey.
:twocents:

 

[QB.]

Wow! I am still shaking my head! Why would Mr Baez want the world to see these? It hardly shines a favourable light on CA and seems to do more to prove Mark N's point than Cindy's. :waitasec:

My thoughts exactly. Great strategy.

 

[I Din Doot]

Wow! I am still shaking my head! Why would Mr Baez want the world to see these? It hardly shines a favourable light on CA and seems to do more to prove Mark N's point than Cindy's. :waitasec:

Maybe this was the only way he could get these documents into the case to help paint CA as a looney. (Part of the poor KC look at what she had to live with defense).

 

[Mrs G Norris]

At the beginning....

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4VZLYb0Yp8&playnext=1&videos=3PSm4cGsSsA[/ame]

..and after.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0rpTTHvezs[/ame]

 

[Paintr]

Maybe this was the only way he could get these document into the case to help paint CA as a looney. (Part of the poor KC look at what she had to live with defense).

Wasn't there already ample evidence of that?

 

[Intermezzo]

BBM Black and Red

http://www.wftv.com/news/18025838/detail.html

The following is a statement released by Mark NeJame on November 20, 2008

Unfortunately, I have made the decision that it is best not to continue my representation of George and Cindy Anthony.

George and Cindy have a belief that their beloved granddaughter, Caylee, is still alive. Tips and leads continue to come in. I believe strongly that they should have every right to maintain their hope and faith that one of these “sightings” will miraculously be the one that brings Caylee home to them. What parent or grandparent would surrender such hope? Who is one person to tell another parent or grandparent when it is time for them to abandon their faith? When does a stranger have the right to judge another who has endured such a loss? The attacks made against them by some are deplorable. Let them be to do what they feel they must to find their beloved granddaughter, Caylee. Knowing this case as well as probably anyone on earth, there is no doubt that they do not know where Caylee is. Allow them to walk their own path.

I only agreed to represent George and Cindy Anthony, so long as there were no restrictions placed on me whatsoever as to finding Caylee, regardless of where this might lead. Quite simply, this meant that I could do whatever I needed to find Caylee whether she was alive or not. It impressed me that George and Cindy, both believing that Caylee was still with us, had an overriding and primary concern in finding Caylee, even if the result was not as they would hope. The other condition I required was that I would have absolutely nothing to do with representing Casey or assisting in her legal defense.

Abundant efforts have been made towards finding Caylee. I have worked with so many involved in this matter towards the goal of finding this dear, missing child who has captured the hearts of so many. Some ignorant and judgmental members of the public though have made hateful and inaccurate accusations against me and others, when they had no idea whatsoever what was really going on. As my new, good friend, Tim Miller from Equusearch, tells me “everybody associated with this case gets body slammed.” However, like Tim, when you know in your heart that you’re doing the right thing, you just move forward knowing that right will ultimately win out. Some have falsely accused me and some others of being in this for the money. If they only knew how utterly wrong and misguided they are.

I had come to a personal opinion and theory for quite some time whether Caylee was still with us or not. However, my opinion was only one like any other…an opinion. The only person without an opinion though is Casey Anthony as only she knows the truth. I believe that the singular person out of the 6 billion people in the world who holds the key to finding Caylee is her mother, Casey Anthony. Although I was quite successful in resolving a multitude of matters, I am unable to go further to help George and Cindy find Caylee in my current role. I can only provide my best advice and must respect any client’s prerogative to do what they deem is best, whether they choose to follow my guidance or not. However, there is little value or use I can provide to any client if they choose to act and comment at will.

As someone who has learned and knows the inner workings and details of the case and its various characters intimately, the rampant sensationalism and unfounded accusations must stop. Allow Cindy and George Anthony the respect and decency of dealing with their hope and efforts to find their missing and beloved Caylee as they need to. Allow those with differing opinions on finding and searching for Caylee, whether she is with us or not, to do their jobs without interruption. Finally, the judicial system is in play and justice will be best served by mindless meddlers staying out of something they know little of. There are many wonderful people involved in efforts to find Caylee and there are, unfortunately, many who are exploiting this child. Sadly, most in the public are clueless about who is doing what and what is really going on. The negative actions of some are only counterproductive and hurtful to the cause of those many good people who are doing so much to do something positive with this most sad and tragic situation. There should only be one goal and that is to find Caylee Marie Anthony.

Mark E. NeJame

 

[Intermezzo]

MARK NEJAME TALKS ABOUT THE BODY ...CAYLEE ANTHONY

FOX Orlando phone interview with NeJame the day remains were found on Suburban Drive.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ajibgshx94"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ajibgshx94[/ame]

 

[whiteangora]

Cindy doesn't seem to have "heard" NeJames yet. I wonder what it's going to actually take to get her to see how she is being manipulated.

Cindy is too busy manipulating to see much of anything, imo.
Her and GA used to have an excellent attorney with Mark NeJame, now they have some wishy-washy puppet.
I wonder how Judge Perry is going to like seeing all of these personal emails JB submitted.

 

[beach]

Dumb question....

Jose is still emailing Cindy on her D Casey email account, does that mean that DC has access to all of their email communications? Most likely he is or has admin privileges.

Good observation. We should make note of the date of this email. (I can't open it right now, but IIRC it was Feb. '10??) It may be a marker since we were trying to figure out in the DC email thread exactly when DC & the Anthonys totally parted ways. It would be crazy for her to still be using an email account linked to DC if they were on the outs, iykwim.

 

[Macushla]

While this response is not as eloquently written as MN's motion and brings a lot of issues into the mix that don't need to be there, I would not say it is worthless. NM laid out his side of what happened the day CM and JB came to inspect the records. Part of JB's response is the defense's side of what happened when they came to inspect the records. In my opinion, the defense has the right to do that. If NM can take pot shots and the defense in his motions - and I don't think anyone here is going to deny that he did; why can't the defense do the same?

I am only focusing on one area of this response - I am not sure how I feel about all the other things the defense included in this motion, I have to go back and read all the motions regarding this again. All I am saying is that if it's ok for MN to tell his side of the story in his motion, it's ok for the defense to tell their side of the story in their response.

 

[The World According]

Cindy is too busy manipulating to see much of anything, imo.
Her and GA used to have an excellent attorney with Mark NeJame, now they have some wishy-washy puppet.
I wonder how Judge Perry is going to like seeing all of these personal emails JB submitted.

The emails had me at "to Beth Karas". Everything that followed was white noise after seeing that. It may as well have been entitled SPIN. SPIN. SPIN.
Clearly the defense has a very personal grudge with Mark, and want to spin publicly in a fashion that would make a politician in a sex scandal take notes.

I agree it was very much their loss when Mark resigned his post. Mr. and Mrs. Anthony's letter, is clearly designed to be released publicly. Advising them not to make any public statements was the best advice they ever received. If you click on the link in my signature line, Mr. Mason was in full agreement with him. All of the public commenting from the lawyers and the parents was making it clear they have absolutely no credibility whatsoever, he opined. Indeed , the irony is rich. What Mr. and Mrs. Anthony fail to recall is that it was THEY who approached another lawyer about replacing Mr. Baez, Mr. Buarauno, who said NO! Guess what, they told him they could not pay him, but rather it would be a contingency MEDIA deal for later!!! Outrageous that now they want to leave the impression they are offended by the mention of such a thing, when it is exactly what THEY did. You just can't make this stuff up!!
MOO

They totally underestimate Judge Perry, Ms. Karas and the public. I assume that will translate to them insulting the intelligence of the jury and we'll see how that turns out. We shall just see.

Casey Anthony's Parents Tried To Replace Jose Baez | The Caylee Daily
Feb 17, 2010 ... Casey Anthony's Parents Tried To Replace Jose Baez .... It seems Cindy and George think of their daughter as a Juvie … a child, ...
www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.com/.../casey-anthonys-parents-tried-to-replace-jose-baez/ - Cached - Similar

 

[countzero]

Sorry everyone, but this latest motion isn't worthy of being used to light a fire. I wanted to say something else, but ya know .... TOS ......

 

[nums24]

The emails had me at "to Beth Karas". Everything that followed was white noise after seeing that. It may as well have been entitled SPIN. SPIN. SPIN.
Clearly the defense has a very personal grudge with Mark, and want to spin publicly in a fashion that would make a politician in a sex scandal take notes.

I agree it was very much their loss when Mark resigned his post. Mr. and Mrs. Anthony's letter, is clearly designed to be released publicly. Advising them not to make any public statements was the best advice they ever received. If you click on the link in my signature line, Mr. Mason was in full agreement with him. All of the public commenting from the lawyers and the parents was making it clear they have absolutely no credibility whatsoever, he opined. Indeed , the irony is rich.

They totally underestimate Judge Perry, Ms. Karas and the public. I assume that will translate to them insulting the intelligence of the jury and we'll see how that turns out. We shall just see.

Is JB even allowed to legally disclose private communications between lawyers and the Anthony's? Let alone leaking it to the media the night before a hearing was to take place?

 

[LambChop]

But wasn't MN's motion addressing issues involving his client, whereas JB was addressing personal issues he has with MN which has nothing to do with MN's motion? Not sure the judge is really interested in JB's personal issues with MN. And why would they be paying a PI to investigate MN's conversation with a writer? I am really, really surprised the writer would discuss any conversations he had with an attorney about a business matter with a third party even if it actually did happen. That part is strange.

Funny how people look at things. I have lost an item and looked, looked, looked for long periods of time only to find it in the exact place I had previous looked for it numerous times before. Just because someone did not find the remains does not mean they were not there and had been placed there right before they were found. You will never convince a jury that this would be so. LE had to dig to recover some of the bone fragments. Bones just do not bury themselves in the ground within a few short weeks. Also chew marks would have come from when the body was decomposing. This theory will not hold up with the forensic reports presented at court. jmo

 

[The World According]

Indeed , the irony is rich. What Mr. and Mrs. Anthony fail to recall is that it was THEY who approached another lawyer about replacing Mr. Baez, Mr. Buonauro, who said NO! Guess what, they told him they could not pay him, but rather it would be a contingency MEDIA deal for later!!! Outrageous that now they want to leave the impression they are offended by the mention of such a thing, when it is exactly what THEY did. You just can't make this stuff up!!
MOO



Casey Anthony's Parents Tried To Replace Jose Baez | The Caylee Daily
Feb 17, 2010 ... Casey Anthony's Parents Tried To Replace Jose Baez .... It seems Cindy and George think of their daughter as a Juvie … a child, ...
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.com/.../casey...ace-jose-baez/ - Cached - Similar

Hello.....Mr. Baez, mom and pop tried to replace you, would you like an Affidavit from the lawyer you tried to hire based on future media rights for payment?
When things backfire on the defense it is of biblical proportions!
Buckle up!

Wow. They think everyone forgets just because they feign to?

 

[beach]

While this response is not as eloquently written as MN's motion and brings a lot of issues into the mix that don't need to be there, I would not say it is worthless. NM laid out his side of what happened the day CM and JB came to inspect the records. Part of JB's response is the defense's side of what happened when they came to inspect the records. In my opinion, the defense has the right to do that. If NM can take pot shots and the defense in his motions - and I don't think anyone here is going to deny that he did; why can't the defense do the same?

I am only focusing on one area of this response - I am not sure how I feel about all the other things the defense included in this motion, I have to go back and read all the motions regarding this again. All I am saying is that if it's ok for MN to tell his side of the story in his motion, it's ok for the defense to tell their side of the story in their response.

You're right Mac, that the defense has every right to address any point brought up in MN's motion, including the portion where he cites CM's remarks during the 6/21 presser. However, every other exhibit attached to back up the rest of his 'response' is in reference to MN's earlier representation of the Anthonys or about some book deal MN is contemplating. I don't recall any of that in MN's initial bad faith motion. It is just mudslinging and nastiness. The purpose of a response (aka Answer) is to ANSWER the opposing counsel's points in their motion. Not to include a bunch of garbage that was never addressed in the first place. If Baez was so darn intent on throwing this trash out there, he should have filed his own bad faith motion against MN. (Good lord, I can't believe I even said that. ack!)

Seriously, this nastiness NEEDS to stop. It has gotten totally out of hand, imo. It reminds me of a 3rd grade playground mentality - "I know I am and so are you!" :crazy: It is ridiculous and totally non-professional. I pray that HHJP slams down his gavel and makes it clear this is not going to be tolerated any longer. I also hope that MN doesn't file a response to this trash. It isn't worthy of one, imo.

 

[Dear Prudence]

Is JB even allowed to legally disclose private communications between lawyers and the Anthony's? Let alone leaking it to the media the night before a hearing was to take place?

I think it's pretty sleazy but doubt that it's illegal since Cindy herself forwarded the communications to Baez, in effect nullifying any privilege she had with her attorney in regards to the emails. JMO

 

[faefrost]

I think it's pretty sleazy but doubt that it's illegal since Cindy herself forwarded the communications to Baez, in effect nullifying any privilege she had with her attorney in regards to the emails. JMO

I'm actually wondering if this hasn't effectively nullified pretty much ALL of the privilege that the A's had with MN? I mean once an attorney has to start defending himself in public from clear mis-truths coming from a client, does not that pretty much open up the whole can of worms?

And if it has eliminated any such privilege, can the SA now interview him? Can he be called to testify on things that he may have observed? particularly if they involve the charges against KC, and not anything incriminating towards CA or GA? if nothing else, could he now be used as a rebuttal witness against CA and GA?