All Texas Equusearch-Related Filings #1

[logicalgirl]

I don't recall if the Judge set a date for the TES doc review to be completed?
But both sides only have until August 31st to put names on their witness list (if defense team magically comes up with any "witnesses" they want to add to the Defense Witness List, out of the 4,000 TES searchers).

OOOOO - won't it be fun if they can take as long as they want but the witness list including searchers must be completed by the same August 31st date? Teehee!

Maybe y'know - depends on just how cross HHJP was.

 

[Intermezzo]

How will this work out physically speaking?
The State Prosecutors and MN will NOT be present while the defense is reviewing the docs, with the SMag monitoring, correct?


So, the defense reviews and tabs ... then what? They call up MN and LDB and FG and JA and say come on over and lookie what we tabbed and lets see if we can agree that I get more info, so we don't have to take this to the Judge to decide?

Thinktank,
#1 Yes, that is how I interpret it..just the Defense and the Magistrate (not someone they will be able to IMO verbally abuse)

#2. Yes, As I interpreted the Order it may go something like that.

As I see it, the Defense will have to inform, discuss and convince Nejame and( I like this one) the State Prosecutors which searcher(s) info they want and, I assume why, and and if the 3 sides can not come to an agreement that the Defense should have this disclosed to them then the Defense can tab it and take it to the Court for consideration.
:twocents:
Yup a Big Win for the Defense

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

All the quotes are attributed to the wrong people.

 

[logicalgirl]

All the quotes are attributed to the wrong people.

We are ignoring it! :woohoo:

 

[Intermezzo]

In my view, this has become much more complicated?
The judge has added another step in the process of the doc review. Instead of the defense reviewing, and tabbing, and then giving to the Special Mag to take to the Judge ..... NOW, the defense reviews, tabs, and then has to assemble MN and all the State Prosecutors to have a pow wow about the tabbed files .. then when (not IF) they do not agree on the relevance ... then the Special Mag takes the info to Judge P. to decide.

The judge is leaving it up to a group of people to "get along" who no doubt, do NOT get along, and do not agree on ANYTHING! I don't even see how they are going to mutually agree on the location of the doc review, without the judge stepping in and making a ruling on that as well???

Thinktank, (the above post was yours..don't know why it shows up nums24)

Well, I can say there is most certainly a sound, reasonable and legal reason for Judge Perry including this in his Order.

Could the Judge be of the conclusion, after reading all the motions submitted by Baez and Nejame all these months regarding this issue..and the fact that Baez has received the names and info of the 32 searchers that searched the area where Caylee's remains were found..that they are on a fishing expedition..but is allowing them leeway because Death is Different and any possible appelate issue?

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

We are ignoring it! :woohoo:

I'm so glad ~ I know I'll seem much smarter this way! :dance:

 

[joypath]

and isn't it exciting to see that the order was submitted to Mrs. Michael Baden!(oops, Linda Kenney Baden, Esquire @ her NYC suite!). SO....she's still part of the party package!:dance:

 

[nums24]

. . . and all of this with the 4,000 records before what deadline?

Today's order says the order dated 7/21 remains in full force and effect in it's entirety except for the following restrictions, and the restrictions do not discuss a date anywhere.

This will be interesting to see, I smell an "emergency motion" coming :crazy:

 

[ThinkTank]

and isn't it exciting to see that the order was submitted to Mrs. Michael Baden!(oops, Linda Kenney Baden, Esquire @ her NYC suite!). SO....she's still part of the party package!:dance:

at least no official Notice of withdrawal .... yet ......

 

[logicalgirl]

Today's order says the order dated 7/21 remains in full force and effect in it's entirety except for the following restrictions, and the restrictions do not discuss a date anywhere.

This will be interesting to see, I smell an "emergency motion" coming :crazy:

And I'm rayer: for a "decline" in motion! :croc:

 

[nums24]

Yes, maybe Judge P. ruled that they must hash it out between themselves before bringing it to him, so he doesn't have to have a long drawn out Hearing for each individual request? That baloney will have already been done and Judge P. can go straight to making his rulings.

The 8/25/10 deadline stands according to the order! Time to play like a grown up JB, in my opinion.

 

[wonders]

I fixed the link in the original post and here it is again, sorry!:

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...der for Motion for Transcription Services.pdf

Thank you nums24 for your trouble.
I think it's just my computer, I still am unable to read it.
Again many many thanks to you for all you do.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

Today's order says the order dated 7/21 remains in full force and effect in it's entirety except for the following restrictions, and the restrictions do not discuss a date anywhere.

This will be interesting to see, I smell an "emergency motion" coming :crazy:

There is no way the defense can inspect all these 4,000 records and comply with all of the extra contingencies by this date unless they do ask for another exception. . . I smell the same odor!

 

[wonders]

What is the second motion for? I mean I know what it is for....Who are these people?

Order for Motion for Transcription Services 08-19-2010
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hig...20Services.pdf

LOL. That's what I have been trying to read, but puter wont let me.
I want to know if it's so that the defense can send these people over to take notes or copy the TES records. If that is the case...Oh Boy, what can a person say?

I may need you logicalgirl to calm me down.

 

[ThinkTank]

Thank you nums24 for your trouble.
I think it's just my computer, I still am unable to read it.
Again many many thanks to you for all you do.

The Order is only one page (not including the signature page) and all it says is that the defense can have those transcripts they asked for (Nums listed them up thread).

 

[wonders]

Some, if not all are LE. HHJP ordered they have to be completed earlier than the other depositions.

Ooooo. Oop's. I'm sorry. Please disreguard all my other posts.

 

[ThinkTank]

LOL. That's what I have been trying to read, but puter wont let me.
I want to know if it's so that the defense can send these people over to take notes or copy the TES records. If that is the case...Oh Boy, what can a person say?

I may need you logicalgirl to calm me down.

The Order letting the defense have the transcripts of these people, has nothing to do with the Order regarding the TES records - they were just filed on the same day.

Originally Posted by nums24
Wells - OCSO

Acevedo - OCSO

Irwin - OCSO

Gottesman - FBI Lab

Shaw - FBI

Lowe - FBI Lab

Fontaine - FBI Lab

Seubert - FBI Lab

 

[nums24]

Thank you nums24 for your trouble.
I think it's just my computer, I still am unable to read it.
Again many many thanks to you for all you do.

Wonders, I'm sorry your having difficulty. Here is a link to the Adobe Acrobat Reader site.

http://get.adobe.com/reader/?promoid=BUIGO


Important:Please be sure to UNCHECK the McAfee Security Status box if you are already running another anti-virus program or you will probably have system problems, it happened to me in the past.

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

So if the defense team does not ask for and receives approval for an extension date for their witness list and does not catch their trophy fish in time ~ does that mean all this effort by them, the state, the court and all of Florida's taxpayers' money is/was for nothing? Has this all been for the benefit of the future jury pool, then?

So much drama and posturing and such a small chance of results!

 

[nums24]

So if the defense team does not ask for and receives approval for an extension date for their witness list and does not catch their trophy fish in time ~ does that mean all this effort by them, the state, the court and all of Florida's taxpayers' money is/was for nothing? Has this all been for the benefit of the future jury pool, then?

So much drama and posturing and such a small chance of results!

That is an excellent question! You should post it in the legal thread.