Zanzibar .... maybe more trivial scratches were caused by GBC when he tried to shave over the top of the scratches on the morning that he telephoned 000.....thus an idea to attribute all of the scratches to the razor was borne.
I thought that there were also scratches on his torso (which could indicate that he was naked, at least to the waist, when they occurred!
Thanks TGY - my first reply!!!! I'm excited :great:
You're right, there were scratches on his "chest, torso and neck" which were photographed by Police on 21 April when he apparently voluntarily attended the Police Station. (
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...fekiller-gerard-badenclay-20120626-210bz.html)
I also agree with regard the more trivial scratches, that he may well have been trying to cover up the major ones. It stated it was done at a different time, I'm not sure how far apart they would have to be for a Dr to determine this.
From my limited research so far about the scratches (I know this is going over old ground for many of you-apologies)
20 April
0800hrs 'ish - QPS notice scratches, GBC says from shaving, QPS say no evidence to support
1000hrs - QPS photographed scratches on GBC's face
?????? - GBC took legal advice and declined to give QPS a statement
21 April
0830hrs - GBC attended 1st Drs clinic asking to have the cuts on his face looked at, saying QPS asked him to (which they didn't)
?????? - GBC voluntarily attended QPS to allow scratches to his body to be photographed on advice from his Lawyers
afternoon - GBC attended 2nd Drs clinic asking same
night - GBC attended 3rd Drs clinic asking same
I believe this means QPS could not see the scratches on his body when they first questioned him and after taking legal advice he had his body examined by a Dr and then attended to have QPS take photo's. It may well have been a surprise to QPS to see the other scratches. Why he attended the 2nd and 3rd Drs remains a mystery to me, maybe he was answer shopping but doc or Alioop might have medical or legal reasons why he may do so.
The key thing that you highlighted for me TGY is that he would likely have been naked as it's unlikely to receive scratches through fabric, although possible. Apart from one mind picture that gives me the shivers, it does indicate to me a bloke at home in shorts or in bed perhaps, when the argument broke out that may have led to the scratches. I live in Vic so this lack of clothing would not be normal unless going to bed, I realise for you guys in the warmer climbs of our lovely country this may not be the case.
All just my humble opinion of course.
Tks in advance for the patience from those in the know as I dig around in old news. :websleuther:
PS - Mods - I haven't linked all the info above but happy to do so if required.