You could well be right. I guess if the lay judges (jury) believe Maresca, Crini, et al, the convictions will be upheld. I don't know what their feeling , or thinking, rather, was about what the defense said (that the "evidence" is illegitimate, etc.).Thank you, SMK.
Let's see what happens.
I am going to give a prediction the the jury will end up upholding the original conviction. JMO.
There is just too much there for Amanda's defense to overcome. IMO.
THe totality of the evidence and everything taken together strongly points towards their guilt.
JMO. I really do not see any way it can come back in any other way.
But let's see, and if the decision is the other way, I will respect it. Eventually, all of this has to come to a stop, so they will have to end up taking one court's decision and sticking with it. They cannot continue this for 20 years, either side. Of course, I do not know what the process is with appeals, etc., so I could very well be talking flubber and it could take literally 20 years!
I think after this ruling - whether acquittals or convictions upheld - there can be another appeal from the losing side, and then the Supreme Court must uphold or overturn that. It does seem absurd that the process goes on for so long. At some point, the matter should be closed. 10 years, noooooo
