Brilliant because I agree with every word
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There are some excellent points in the article, although there are a couple of points where the timeline is not exact.
"There is no evidence whatsoever that had her boss not been able to clear himself, that Knox would have ever done so. She would have been content to allow him to remain in prison for decades as long as she got away. No one involved with the case contends the blaming of Patrick by Knox was anything other than a lie.
...
Police say Knox was turning cartwheels. She claims she was merely doing the splits.
...
"There's a lot of blood in the bathroom." (But not enough for Knox to have called police promptly with Meredith also missing?)
...
So both Guede, convicted of murder, and Knox, had essentially the same story, there was a black man in Meredith's room, and Meredith screamed. Knox had no way of knowing what Guede's testimony would be at the time, he was not apprehended until much later.
...
Setting the DNA aside, we have a defendant in the case having said he witnessed the knife cut Kercher. The only question is where it occurred, and how. First you say Meredith was cut by the knife, then you argue there is no proof of what you said. That is running from the truth.
...
Glass from the broken window appeared on top of items that were move around, as though rummaged through by a burglar, instead of underneath."
...
http://www.examiner.com/article/knox-and-sollecito-fugitives-from-truth
