Amanda Knox tried for the murder of Meredith Kercher in Italy *NEW TRIAL*#14

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
Corriere interview with Stephanie Kercher is most interesting.

http://www.corriere.it/cronache/14_...ia-aa271b24-8971-11e3-be5b-d457abaa7165.shtml

The impression I'm getting is that she has serious doubts about Amanda's guilt but can't back down from the lawsuit, it is too late.

Interesting comments under the article.

I don't know if Knox and Sollecito are guilty or not. I know that this judicial system needs reform.

Sometimes the families of the victims seem to be victims of the prosecution.

Poor Stephanie, we also know that we have to endure this incomprehensible Italian judicial system.
 
  • #162
Okie. But they said 20 tonight, and that matches the Hellmann time......in any case, just want a verdict :crazy:
If they are going to have dinner then I am sure it is all going to take much longer. Italians ;)
 
  • #163
  • #164
Good morning!
cuppaluv_zps36caecb5.gif
 
  • #165
  • #166
  • #167
  • #168
  • #169
  • #170
Lumumba who is in court today reveling in media attention says:

"Raffaele has always given me the impression of a nice guy"

Lumumba exchanged smiles and shook hands with Raffaele leaving the courtroom.

http://www.lastampa.it/2014/01/30/italia/cronache/omicidio-meredith-tra-poche-ore-la-sentenza-della-corte-dassise-ANbQDy01daue51KRnYDKCK/pagina.html

Reveling in the media attention?

He's in court today because he has every right to be there. I doubt he's reveling in the attention any more than RS.
 
  • #171
  • #172
Letter from Amanda

http://www.corriere.it/cronache/14_...ia-aa271b24-8971-11e3-be5b-d457abaa7165.shtml

This is Google Translate on two paragraphs from the text:

Una lettera di Amanda Knox per Stephanie, la sorella di Meredith Kercher, la studentessa uccisa a Perugia la notte tra il primo e il 2 novembre 2007. Ma la busta è rimasta chiusa: «Non sento ancora il bisogno di parlare con lei», ha detto Stephanie. E ha aggiunto: «Dobbiamo sopportare il sistema giudiziario italiano, ma vorremmo che il processo finisse. Il verdetto non sarà una rivincita». La sentenza è attesa per stasera a Firenze.

La busta chiusa - «Amanda vi ha scritto una lettera, prima del verdetto, da consegnarvi se un giorno la vorrete».
Non avevo idea di che reazione avrebbe avuto Stephanie Kercher quando le ho dato questa notizia durante l’intervista pochissimi giorni fa. Qualunque reazione, anche l’abbandono dell’intervista, sarebbe stata legittima. Invece questa ragazza straordinariamente forte ed equilibrata si è fermata a pensarci, come ha fatto per ogni altra domanda. E poi, con calma, ha risposto: «Ci dovrei pensare, non lo so, ma oggi non la vorrei leggere, perché non sento adesso il bisogno di parlare con lei». La parola oggi, invece che mai, è un atto di grande generosità e razionalità. Credo che non dipenderà tanto dal verdetto, ma dal comportamento futuro di Amanda nelle settimane, nei mesi, negli anni.



A letter of Amanda Knox for Stephanie , sister of Meredith Kercher , the student killed in Perugia on the night between the first and November 2, 2007 . But the envelope was closed : "I still feel the need to talk with her," said Stephanie . He added: "We have to put up with the Italian judicial system , but we would like the process to end. The verdict will not be a rematch . " The ruling is expected tonight in Florence.

The sealed envelope - "Amanda wrote you a letter, before the verdict , as if one day you will want to deliver ."
I had no idea what the reaction would have been Stephanie Kercher when I gave her the news during an interview a few days ago. Whatever the reaction, the abandonment of the interview , it would have been legitimate. But this girl amazingly strong and balanced not stop thinking about it, as it has for every other question . And then , slowly, he replied: " I'd have to think, I do not know , but today I'd like to read, because now I do not feel the need to talk with her." The word today , rather than ever, it is an act of great generosity and rationality. I do not think much will depend on the verdict , but the future behavior of Amanda in the weeks, months , years .



Does that make sense to anyone? ... and we should believe that the electronic tool is better with legal documents?

That made no sense to me. Confusion everywhere.
 
  • #173
  • #174
Ok, now if there are any questions as to whether or not it was raining at the time of this picture.....we have the picture as proof :) No need to check weather reports.
:laugh: :laugh:
 
  • #175
Almost 20 of 5 pm now in Florence, but something tells me they will wait until 8 PM......
 
  • #176
It's interesting that Raffaele is the good guy but Amanda is the she-devil. Talk about a PR spin going on. They were together that whole night. If Raffaele is innocent then Amanda is innocent.

I personally believe both are innocent, based on the scene inside Meredith's BR. That tells the tale right there. Rudy Guede is a cold blooded murderer and he alone committed that crime, IMO.
 
  • #177
It seems like there is quite a difference between the defense of Knox and Sollecito. All he had to do was distance himself from Knox's proclamations, and refute the knife/clasp evidence. The knife evidence is refuted as it's a small speck in an irregular place that could be doubted.. without confirmatory evidence, it is weak. The clasp evidence is easy to question because it was not collected for 46 days, but that doesn't mean it isn't valid (that question of whether overturning the verdict will result in the perception of innocence).

Knox has to argue that the knife with her DNA embedded in the handle is irrelevant, the absence of prints throughout the cottage is normal, her strange behaviour and activities is meaningless, her irregular remarks (Meredith routinely locked her bedroom) were a translation error, that she was coerced after 1.5 hours to sign a statement confirming verbal testimony that was a result of torture, and that she has every intention of making amends for her false accusation conviction ... when she gets around to it ... compensating her victim is apparently problematic for Knox.

Otto, this is what I was saying yesterday. Anyone, even untrained in the law, can tell that Raffaele has a much better case than Amanda, based on the forensic evidence. Now, circumstantial I don't know, but I would guess he has a better circumstantial case too since he didn't accuse an innocent man and he seems to have kept more quiet than Amanda. Plus it was not his house - meaning it was Amanda's house, she would have had to have given the access if it was not a real burglary. I think Amanda has a much worse case than Raffaele - Raffaele being sort of having built-in excuse since he did not live there, he would not have had the key to open the door for anyone.

All he had to do was distance himself from Amanda.

I'm not sayiing it would have worked, what I'm saying is that he would have at least had a chance this way.

So why did he not do that?

Why stick with Amanda, even to your own detriment (as we see it from the outside)?

This is just like Interrogations - Part Deux.

Because he did not want Amanda to suddenly change her course, and reveal Raffaele's involvment in the whole thing.

He decided it was best to "stick together" so there was no chance of her turning on him, of her changing her defense, of her revealing his involvement.

He decided best course is to keep with the Plan they had developed in the very beginning - to stick together and be each other's alibi.
 
  • #178
After hearing the defense team's final rebuttals, the jury retired to deliberate and a verdict was not expected until after 5 p.m. local time (11 a.m. ET).

Attorneys had already began gathering inside the courtroom an hour before that.

Dressed in a purple sweater with sunglasses nestled on his collar, Sollecito made it to the tribunal for the morning session that was beamed around the world and was expected to return for the verdict.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/30/world/europe/italy-amanda-knox-retrial/
 
  • #179
The court pushed back the time of announcement. At 18 they're going to tell the time of judgment reading.
 
  • #180
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
50
Guests online
2,382
Total visitors
2,432

Forum statistics

Threads
632,856
Messages
18,632,614
Members
243,314
Latest member
Wintrrr
Back
Top