I just wish there was a sense of finality with this verdict. But there isn't. In the US, verdicts have a sense of finality - it is pretty much final either way. Even in the case of guilty and then appeal, well the original verdicts very rarely get overturned. The subsequent judge or judges usually go along with what the first judge said, it would have to be a very big thing for them to go against the original presiding judge. So it's not like there's a guilty verdict, and then we're thinking, oh we have to wait for the appeal, have to wait for the appeal. Because we pretty much know that most of the time, the appeal will get denied if the original verdict was Guilty. Like I said, it has to be a Big thing to get it overturned. On the other hand, if not-guilty, it is final. Both scenarios, pretty much final.
And you do not have two judges saying completely opposite things. A higher judge will most of the time uphold the lower judge, unless there is some extraordinary circumstance.
This is really crazy.