Amanda Knox tried for the murder of Meredith Kercher in Italy *NEW TRIAL*#14

[animlzrule]

Actually she has been proven to be a murderer-twice. And the Kerchers even said in my quote above that they believe more than one person was in the room when Meredith was killed. Do you think Rafe went there without Amanda??? Not likely- that leaves Rudy, Rafe, and Amanda all involved, and all were convicted in Meredith's death.

I understand. And I contend that the convictions are not indicative of proof of guilt. The investigation, prosecution and trials were plagued with ineptitude from the get go. I hear what the Kerchers "believe". That doesn't make it true, or rational, and has not been definitively proven. This trial had more to do with politics than justice. The Kerchers seem to be intelligent people. I think in the dark of night, away from all of the chaos and outside influence, they know deep down that the trial verdict is specious.

 

[Linda7NJ]

It wouldn't change the facts. DNA is inclusive, not exclusive. So everyone who's DNA is present needs to be examined if there is a reason for their DNA to be there. That is if the DNA can be matched to someone. The facts in this case are Sollecito's DNA was found on Meredith's bra clasp, and it had no other reason to be there other than he at some point touched her bra clasp. A third male's DNA may have been present, but if it doesn't match any known person very little can be done with it. Since we don't know who's DNA it is, there may be a logical reason for it to be there, while there is no logical innocent reason for Sollecito's to be.





Lack of DNA actually means nothing, because many times there just isn't DNA present.

Bravo! Thank you button wasn't enough!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[I Must Break You]

And whose unknown dna was on it??

I actually just had to go look this up. I only remembered faintly reading about another possible persons DNA on the clasp. There actually is dispute whether there is any other DNA present. Stefanoni claims that there isn't and what is seen is just meaningless data. Of course Conti and Vecchiotti believe that these "stutters" are a third persons DNA, regardless it has a very weak and faint presence.

Either way Sollecito's DNA is surely there.

 

[otto]

She will have plenty to say on her media tour...I predict that will start tomorrow.
Wonder how much she will be paid for the interviews?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I read somewhere that she's scheduled to appear on GMA tomorrow!
... where she will say the same things we've heard for years.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

IMO cutting the strap was part of the staging.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly ! Rudy did NOT participate in the "staging" :

- His bloody footprints went from Meredith's room straight out the front door ...

- His DNA and/or fingerprints were NOT found anywhere in roommate's room with the broken window ...

- And HOW would Rudy know to lock Meredith's bedroom door ? JMO, but only someone who LIVED in the cottage would know this tidbit of info ...


:facepalm: Of course, we know what other evidence he left ... :facepalm:

:scared:

 

[ScarlettScarpetta]

I actually just had to go look this up. I only remembered faintly reading about another possible persons DNA on the clasp. There actually is dispute whether there is any other DNA present. Stefanoni claims that there isn't and what is seen is just meaningless data. Of course Conti and Vecchiotti believe that these "stutters" are a third persons DNA, regardless it has a very weak and faint presence.

Either way Sollecito's DNA is surely there.

Which the experts believe was contamination.

We are not going to change each others minds for sure..

BUt I hope and pray they get found not guilty on appeal. They don't deserve to be guilty.. Not with this evidence.

 

[Linda7NJ]

I understand. And I contend that the convictions are not indicative of proof of guilt. The investigation, prosecution and trials were plagued with ineptitude from the get go. I hear what the Kerchers "believe". That doesn't make it true, or rational, and has not been definitively proven. This trial had more to do with politics than justice. The Kerchers seem to be intelligent people. I think in the dark of night, away from all of the chaos and outside influence, they know deep down that the trial verdict is specious.

I assure you my opinion has zero to do with politics.
My opinion
Is based on the totality of the evidence and there is a mountain of it, logic and common sense. they both are guilty way beyond a reasonable doubt IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[I Must Break You]

Which the experts believe was contamination.

We are not going to change each others minds for sure..

BUt I hope and pray they get found not guilty on appeal. They don't deserve to be guilty.. Not with this evidence.

No we surely are not, still waiting to hear how the clasp became contaminated though. Also there are plenty of experts that believe that it isn't contaminated, this case more than most others is which side you want to believe I guess.

And I believe this evidence more than proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[Linda7NJ]

I read somewhere that she's scheduled to appear on GMA tomorrow!

... where she will say the same things we've heard for years.

I would rather stick a rusty fork in my eye than watch her again pretending to be an innocent victim while lying through her teeth. If she had something to say, she should have said it in court.

She's guilty and she knows it, and she knew the evidence proved it. That's why she didn't show up. Her PR machine was helpful in swaying public opinion... That didn't do her any good. The publics opinions don't matter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Linda7NJ]

Exactly ! Rudy did NOT participate in the "staging" :



- His bloody footprints went from Meredith's room straight out the front door ...



- His DNA and/or fingerprints were NOT found anywhere in roommate's room with the broken window ...



- And HOW would Rudy know to lock Meredith's bedroom door ? JMO, but only someone who LIVED in the cottage would know this tidbit of info ...





:facepalm: Of course, we know what other evidence he left ... :facepalm:



:scared:

Why would Rudy even take the time to lock the door?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[I Must Break You]

Why would Rudy even take the time to lock the door?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And why couldn't Sollecito kick the flimsy thing in? Seems Filomena's bf had no trouble.

 

[Linda7NJ]

Why did Amanda lie and claim Meredith always locked her door?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Linda7NJ]

Rudy's footprints prove he never turned to face the door to lock it.
How could he have locked it with his feet placement where they were? He couldn't.

Who had a motive to stage...only one person on the planet. Amanda Knox.

Those other prints belonged to AMANDA. Her footprints face the locked door.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[I Must Break You]

Rudy's footprints prove he never turned to face the door to lock it.
How could he have locked it with his feet placement where they were? He couldn't.

Who had a motive to stage...only one person on the planet. Amanda Knox.

Those prints belonged to AMANDA. Her footprints face the locked door.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Stop you're making way too much sense. Seriously how anyone can look at the solid physical evidence and the overwhelming circumstantial evidence and then say with a straight face that there is no evidence, is well beyond me.

 

[Linda7NJ]

BTW...I did go out & had a fabulous Italian dinner...



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[LinasK]

She will have plenty to say on her media tour...I predict that will start tomorrow.
Wonder how much she will be paid for the interviews?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's already started- the stories about her parents' outrage. I chose not to read those.

 

[Linda7NJ]

Stop you're making way too much sense. Seriously how anyone can look at the solid physical evidence and the overwhelming circumstantial evidence and then say with a straight face that there is no evidence, is well beyond me.

It's beyond me too.

....shrug.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[LinasK]

I understand. And I contend that the convictions are not indicative of proof of guilt. The investigation, prosecution and trials were plagued with ineptitude from the get go. I hear what the Kerchers "believe". That doesn't make it true, or rational, and has not been definitively proven. This trial had more to do with politics than justice. The Kerchers seem to be intelligent people. I think in the dark of night, away from all of the chaos and outside influence, they know deep down that the trial verdict is specious.

This time the verdict can't be blamed on a corrupt prosecutor.

 

[Vinny]

I really think Knox was jealous of Meredith. I think the two probably butted heads and Meredith was a very likeable, attractive girl. The jealousy built to rage and...

JMO as far as motive for her is concerned.

 

[jgsmith]

There is zero chance AK will be extradited. Maybe even less than that. If there was compelling evidence of her guilt, there would be plenty of support for extradition. The discussion on this forum alone should convince any reasonable person, pro-guilt or pro-innocence, that you may be wrong. This will give more than enough fodder to reject extradition.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk