Angelina Jolie

  • #501
Bobbisangel said:
I wonder where marriage fits into their plans or if they are going to be like Cruise control and Katie and keep putting it off.
Well,the tabloids keep saying Brad desperately wants to get married. Supposedly, Angelina told a film director or someone that they would never get married. Just my opinion, but I don't see this relationship lasting. I do think, though, that Brad would support all three kids and be a big part of their lives.
 
  • #502
carnation said:
Well,the tabloids keep saying Brad desperately wants to get married. Supposedly, Angelina told a film director or someone that they would never get married. Just my opinion, but I don't see this relationship lasting. I do think, though, that Brad would support all three kids and be a big part of their lives.

I don't see the relationship lasting either, but who knows. They just seem like such different people to me. She seems like she would like to live abroad and he'd rather be settled down in one spot with his family.
 
  • #503
I think the relationship will last. probably wishful thinkin, but still . . .

anyway:

Jolie and baby daughter 'doing well'

A doctor at the hospital said there were no complications, and that mother and child were doing well.

“She is a healthy baby,” he said, speaking on condition of anonymity. He declined to provide other details. The Namibian government has gone to extraordinary lengths to protect the privacy of Jolie and Pitt, not only installing tight security around their hotel and the hospital but also refusing visas to foreign journalists unless they had written permission from Jolie and Pitt to cover the birth.

Police ringed the hospital, refusing to admit journalists and photographers into the building, arresting photographers and confiscating film. Nuuyoma said the couple planned to remain in Namibia for an unspecified length of time after the birth but he declined to give any other details.


http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=184166454&p=y84y67y6x

naja - i thought 'film' had all but disappeared?
 
  • #504
Yes...I thought they all shot digitally these days. Film is so 1998!
 
  • #505
I am happy for the new parents and the siblings as well. I really admire Brad and Angelina for using their fame and the buzz over their baby's birth to generate funds for charity by selling the pictures. Very generous and selfless, imo.

One thing I hope for, for all 3 children, is that the family can settle down and stay in one place called home. Maybe I am biased, but I really think children need a stable, predictable home life. As much as i admire Brad and Angelina for the works they are doing, I don't feel a life of flying from country to country is in the best interests of these children. I pray they will take some time to just get settled with these children and get them into a secure, happy, routine situation.

imo
 
  • #506
Tristan said:
Can you explain your comment about Scientologists not wanting parents(?)
to eat cupcakes in front of their child???

I've never heard of that. LOL

Scientologists are not supposed to have sugar.
 
  • #507
Scientologists are not supposed to have sugar??!

Boy, I guess I will NEVER be a Scientologist then!!! LOL
 
  • #508
HeartofTexas said:
This is now two families in the last month who have "two adopted children" and now one "real" child... Lordy, but I'm tired of hearing the other children referred to as "adopted children". I heard it ad nauseum with Cruise and now it's all over the news with Angelina's two "adopted children". All 3 children of each family are their kids... not just the "real" one. It's sad that our society still feels a need to refer to them as "adopted" children. It would have been just as easy to refer to Tom's other two as his "two older children" as it was to continuously throw in the word "adopted". And no, I'm not adopted... but thank you for allowing me my rant!



I think that it is terrible too. It comes out sounding like a negative. I would be upset if I were in the parents shoes....not for myself but about how it might affect my children. Maybe the press would stop it if the parents would speak up. A lot of what Cruise has said would lead a person to believe that this is his first child...ever. This is not his first child and it isn't the first time he has had a baby in his home. I guess he is just so proud that he actually DID IT that he doesn't remember that there have been two other babies before this one. He's such a creep in every way. He gets homlier every day.
 
  • #509
HeartofTexas said:
This is now two families in the last month who have "two adopted children" and now one "real" child... Lordy, but I'm tired of hearing the other children referred to as "adopted children". I heard it ad nauseum with Cruise and now it's all over the news with Angelina's two "adopted children". All 3 children of each family are their kids... not just the "real" one. It's sad that our society still feels a need to refer to them as "adopted" children. It would have been just as easy to refer to Tom's other two as his "two older children" as it was to continuously throw in the word "adopted". And no, I'm not adopted... but thank you for allowing me my rant!


:clap::clap::clap::clap: Thank you for saying this. It's gotten on my nerves and I just cringe when I hear the media refer to Angelina's and Cruise's other children as their "adopted children". It's as if they are saying these aren't real children or something. It irritates the hell out of me.

I saw an interview with Sharon Stone a few months ago and she said she doesn't understand why people refer to her sons as her "adopted" children because they are HER CHILDREN regardless of where they came from.
 
  • #510
Tristan said:
Yes...I thought they all shot digitally these days. Film is so 1998!
It's digital and camera phones now !;)
 
  • #511
Floh said:
*cough* i have a leetle bugbear i'd like to share which may be a wee bit off topic, but in regards to the thread title.

here goes: i disike the word 'kid' to be used for a child.

children are bit baby goats.

i have no idea as to the history of the term. why on earth was it started?

i mean, 'puppy' or 'kitten', maybe . . . but 'kid'?

it has come into common British English parlance nowadays too.

Floh,

I have to agree,I never liked a child being refered to as a "kid" either.

But the funny part is,I don't mind if there is more than one child and say: "the kids are out playing" or "the kids are sleeping",but I think it sounds kind of harsh and some what cold,when it's just one child and says: "the kid is out playing" or "the kid is sleeping." Weird huh? Or maybe I'm just weird!

Sorry for going off topic!
 
  • #512
I am the same way Capps. If someone says "the kids are out playing" it sounds ok. But if they say "the kid is out playing" it sounds detached and like there is no real depth of feeling. Funny huh?
 
  • #513
HeartofTexas said:
This is now two families in the last month who have "two adopted children" and now one "real" child... Lordy, but I'm tired of hearing the other children referred to as "adopted children". I heard it ad nauseum with Cruise and now it's all over the news with Angelina's two "adopted children". All 3 children of each family are their kids... not just the "real" one. It's sad that our society still feels a need to refer to them as "adopted" children. It would have been just as easy to refer to Tom's other two as his "two older children" as it was to continuously throw in the word "adopted". And no, I'm not adopted... but thank you for allowing me my rant!

I read in one of the papers that when Brad had sent the Email to Cannes to say he would not be there. He said it was because the birth of his third child was imminent.
 
  • #514
sandraladeda said:
I am happy for the new parents and the siblings as well. I really admire Brad and Angelina for using their fame and the buzz over their baby's birth to generate funds for charity by selling the pictures. Very generous and selfless, imo.

One thing I hope for, for all 3 children, is that the family can settle down and stay in one place called home. Maybe I am biased, but I really think children need a stable, predictable home life. As much as i admire Brad and Angelina for the works they are doing, I don't feel a life of flying from country to country is in the best interests of these children. I pray they will take some time to just get settled with these children and get them into a secure, happy, routine situation.

imo
I so agree with you, they do seem to be wonderful parents, but having a stationary home is really important. Unfortunately as long as Angelina remains US Ambassador she will continue that lifestyle. And she seems to really love doing that so who knows.
 
  • #515
shiloh..?...i love it :cool: ..can you imagine how pretty her smile must be?...
 
  • #516
Marthatex said:
So she became pregnant shortly after the divorce was finalized.

Looking back at the "rags" last September, looks like she put her house in England up for sale, moved in with Brad in Malibu, and announced she was taking a year off from films.

Guess they had plans.

lol...
 
  • #517
TisHerself said:
I so agree with you, they do seem to be wonderful parents, but having a stationary home is really important. Unfortunately as long as Angelina remains US Ambassador she will continue that lifestyle. And she seems to really love doing that so who knows.

i think you're right....her/her & Brad will raise several children...
 
  • #518
I'm glad I'm not the only one objecting to a baby being called a Jolie- Pitt kid .I'm sure this little baby will be loved and cared for by Brad and Angelina , Congragts to the very proud parents .
 
  • #519
redeskimo said:
I'm glad I'm not the only one objecting to a baby being called a Jolie- Pitt kid .I'm sure this little baby will be loved and cared for by Brad and Angelina , Congragts to the very proud parents .

ditto....
 
  • #520

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
3,514
Total visitors
3,584

Forum statistics

Threads
632,606
Messages
18,628,900
Members
243,211
Latest member
Crissy75
Back
Top