Anthony`s volunteer fingerprints-Potential case being built against them?

[countzero]

http://www.wftv.com/news/18282120/detail.html

BC seeking for immunity for the A's.

 

[elfie]

I think GA's perjury is more serious because he spoke at the GJ (& to the FBI) and we know since then he's sung a very different tune in public forums..It's definitely time for another FBI interview!

With all due respect in what way can you surmise perjury? His testimony at the GJ is closed and saying whatever he so desires on TV or to the media is in NO WAY perjury. If anything his statements to LE would be the ones considered to be based on truth. Perjury only applies to sworn statements in a court proceeding.

 

[Secretsolver]

Criminal trials are open to the public as long as the perp is not being tried as a juvenile. You just show up at the courtroom before the time of the trial. If there are too many spectators for the size of the room the court may (but doesn't have to) set up another room for the overflow and then give that room a video feed.

When you go to the court be prepared to go through a metal detector.

Especially at the Orange county Courthouse. They are very strict regarding security and will look through your bags as well.

 

[awakewriter]

When are we going to see the search warrants!?!

 

[Fridawolf]

Whether their prints are 'on file' or not, they did cooperate by providing them again. LE must have asked for the prints, the Anthonys didn't refuse. That fits my definition of 'cooperating'.

I agree!

 

[Janis396]

Weren't the Aisenberg's (5 month old Sabrina) busted by hidden bugs and surveillance in their home when their baby disappeared?

 

[luvmy4brats]

http://www.wftv.com/news/18282120/detail.html

The new lawyer for George and Cindy Anthony spoke to the public Monday (watch video). He said he didn't know about plans to prosecute them on charges related to the case, but he did tell Eyewitness News that he is seeking immunity for Caylee's grandparents.

 

[Themis]

:read::read::read::sleuth::sleuth::sleuth:

I don't want to lose this discussion on obstruction of justice or accessory after the fact. It is a treasure of information on a topic that will be important quite soon.

It obviously took a lot of time for the posters to put together.

The last thread was locked instead of merged apparently because this later-formed thread has a broader topic heading that includes this information. However, when that happens, we can easily lose important information during the middle of an active discusssion.

So, I just want to save this as it represents a lot of legal work. Thank you to Miracles Happen. :clap::grouphug::clap:



http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75101&page=6 The legal material starts a few pages before the last page.

 

[curiositycat]

Here are my thoughts about the evidence found by LE when the skull/bag was first found last Thurs; I am wondering if LE had specifically asked the A's about "anything" being missing..from the bed, Caylee's room, ect. I am going to step out on a limb and guess they did. I am also going to bet the A's said "no." Now if what they found was something that should have been obvious to the A's they may now feel the A's have been lying to them all along.

We have no idea what they found but whatever it was it caused them to fly over there and secure the home. I am thinking it was part of Caylee's bedding..sheet, ect.

I believe that they have gone out of their way to impede the investigation since they realized that Caylee was TRULY missing and not just a pawn in a sick game KC was playing with them.

JMO

 

[RR0004]

http://www.wftv.com/news/18282120/detail.html

BC seeking for immunity for the A's.

...strange, I just watched a snippet of his presser. He said LE doesn't have any plans to charge them with anything...not like they'd broadcast it if they were. I think they'll wait a bit.

 

[Truthwillsetufree]

Does anyone else believe it is no coincidence that LE meets with the A's on Sat. and takes their fingerprints then announces on Mon. that charges may be filed on the A's. And that during that same time period that the A's has their house swept for bugs?

My guess is that the A's were told on Sat. that there might be charges against them. And without knowing what the evidence was, the A's just automatically assumed that they must have been overheard discussing their actions on the case. IOW's, what they said may be very incriminating.

Question: Since a wiretap cannot legally be installed without a warrant, if the A's did find and remove a bug- is that obstruction or contempt of court or anything illegal?

Just remember the FBI is involved with this case, we are in an age of new technologies where "wiretapping" and "bugs" are as new as 8 tracks, we don't know that there wasn't a warrant for listening in.

 

[indicat]

"Conway admits the Anthonys have made conflicting statements in the past. They will be re-interviewed by investigators. He said, for the next interview they give to authorities, there will not be any conflicting statements." Per WFTV, I have to say I really like their lawyer and I really feel they are finally listening to somebody that has their best interests in mind.

 

[jennyb]

Does anyone else believe it is no coincidence that LE meets with the A's on Sat. and takes their fingerprints then announces on Mon. that charges may be filed on the A's. And that during that same time period that the A's has their house swept for bugs?

My guess is that the A's were told on Sat. that there might be charges against them. And without knowing what the evidence was, the A's just automatically assumed that they must have been overheard discussing their actions on the case. IOW's, what they said may be very incriminating.

Question: Since a wiretap cannot legally be installed without a warrant, if the A's did find and remove a bug- is that obstruction or contempt of court or anything illegal?

This has also been my question!!! I'll keep reading to see if anyone's answered...

 

[Truthwillsetufree]

Weren't the Aisenberg's (5 month old Sabrina) busted by hidden bugs and surveillance in their home when their baby disappeared?

Absolutely.

 

[Chilly Willy]

http://www.wftv.com/news/18282120/detail.html

The new lawyer for George and Cindy Anthony spoke to the public Monday (watch video). He said he didn't know about plans to prosecute them on charges related to the case, but he did tell Eyewitness News that he is seeking immunity for Caylee's grandparents.

Smart move. I wonder why MN never thought to do that. This new attorney really seems to be on the ball.

 

[Mermaid]

Criminal trials are open to the public as long as the perp is not being tried as a juvenile. You just show up at the courtroom before the time of the trial. If there are too many spectators for the size of the room the court may (but doesn't have to) set up another room for the overflow and then give that room a video feed.

When you go to the court be prepared to go through a metal detector.

Thanks, mysteriew; I'm so obsessed with this case, I just might have to go ahead and try to get in.

 

[amysmom]

They would not be talking about charging the A's with anything because of what they said on LKL or any of the ravings in the media. The A's have no obligation to tell the truth to LK or any media source. While public statements can be used to impune the A's credibility at trial they do not rise to the level of criminal or chargeable.

They will act if the physical evidence they are now finding calls into question some of the sworn testimony given by the A's to LE. I suspect that LE is starting to doubt some of the testimony and stated timelines regarding June 15-16 and the day George caught KC with the gascans (June 24?). They are also probably questioning some of G and C's handling of physical evidence from the car, and from the house.

I think purposely tainting the jury pool should be a criminal offense.

Everything the A's are saying to the public is meant to create reasonable doubt & they know this can possibly lead to a very misleading Non-GUILTY verdict for their daughter.

That reeks of some form of Obstruction of Justice in my eyes.

The defense pulls this too, not doubt about it, but they should be made to wait for trial before trying to scam the jury..Not before it's even selected.

I'm sure LE did doubt some of the A's sworn testimony (from the start) & do get without evidence there wasn't anything they could do..It should be very interesting to see what happens in the future re: this issue.

 

[McSev]

Just remember the FBI is involved with this case, we are in an age of new technologies where "wiretapping" and "bugs" are as new as 8 tracks, we don't know that there wasn't a warrant for listening in.

As was mentioned above, the Aisenbergs had that happen to them. Frankly, the recordings made were so bad (lots of static, electronic hum) that how the FBI convinced a judge to even get it to court was amazing and the trial was tossed by the judge because that's all they had. It was really *that* bad.

Despite if we think it's nuts or not, it was probably a smart move on the PI's part to check for them.

 

[DianeB]

I don't know about George and Cindy, but you know how much Miss Casey loves her cell phone.

http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20081215080519145

 

[jennyb]

http://www.wftv.com/news/18282120/detail.html

BC seeking for immunity for the A's.

From your link: Attorney Brad Conway also said he is representing the Anthonys for free.

What is it about this family that inspires people to work for free???? I don't get it. There are so many people who truly need help in this world.

Yeah, I know... publicity. GMAB.