April 29 weekend of Sleuthiness

[otto]

anybody buying the duck testimony??

What do you mean?

 

[Cheyenne130]

FD may be a different story, but as far as johnfear, I'd be skeptical of a man's claim of an ability to read what 1 woman is thinking, much less 10 women.

:floorlaugh:

 

[Palomine]

What do you mean?

most everyone spoke of the missing ducks and then they appear! Reminds me of Michael Peterson and the blow poke

 

[SleuthinNC]

There is definitely something we are missing from the testimony. We have been discussing Duplicate IP errors but what was said several times was IP Mismatch error which seems to be something different.

What I'm not understanding is how the error information on the laptop is tracing back to the router.

 

[otto]

most everyone spoke of the missing ducks and then they appear! Reminds me of Michael Peterson and the blow poke

The ducks were there all along, but it seems that the police didn't bother looking for them. Even though half the house was boxed and packed, the ducks weren't where JA said they were, so police, it seems, decided they were missing and even went so far as to suggest the ducks were involved in the murder.

I think it's relatively easy to replace a fireplace tool, but the ducks were rather unique and not easy to replace.

 

[ncsu95]

And the female ADA is in the drug unit too. I noticed both names and it somewhat surprised me. Do you think it could be because they have had trial experience with Kurtz in the past and that's why they were plucked out of the drug unit to participate in this trial?
You know, I really like Kurtz. I have grown accustomed to his whine--it doesn't even bother me any more. I am beginning to think he's cute too. Hope I never need him but I have to say he's given 110 percent in this case. I'm going to come away from this trial recommending him to my friends in the Raleigh area if they ever need a specific type of service he is well versed in. I 'liked' his law firm on FB the other day.

That was the AF in my post. As for Kurtz, I really really respect how he has talked to every single witness (both sides). Sure he tries to be very leading with his questions, but he has never raised his voice to a witness or talked to them in a condescending tone like Boz has to a few. Even with JP, he was fairly polite as he basically accused him of having a motive to murder NC. I would hire him without hesitation as well.

 

[WolfpackWoman]

If it has a 10.x.x.x address, it's not on a home network as far as I know.

So, would that mean that the router isn't in the house then? Or just that it's using the Cisco network?

 

[Cheyenne130]

So, would that mean that the router isn't in the house then? Or just that it's using the Cisco network?

Are you saying that the router did have a 10.x.x.x address or "what if" the router had a 10.x.x.x address? I've not heard anything about what address was in conflict.

 

[Amster]

most everyone spoke of the missing ducks and then they appear! Reminds me of Michael Peterson and the blow poke

Yep, imagine that! Especially the part about them being in the lawyers office!

 

[ncsu95]

[Again, assuming that a Dup Address error is really what's in the log.] The laptop is reporting that some device that has the MAC address of the 3825 has the same IP address as that of the laptop. I don't follow how your scenario accounts for that.

Someone mentioned something about a 4 hour offset in logs during the "FBI" testimony. I don't know what that was about or have any more information. But if that is correct, could it be 6:21 PM and he still be at work?

 

[WolfpackWoman]

Are you saying that the router did have a 10.x.x.x address or "what if" the router had a 10.x.x.x address? I've not heard anything about what address was in conflict.

Just a "what if" question. I haven't heard anything about the specific IP address either, just trying to figure out what people will argue as the information comes out, and trying to see how it fits in with the VPN issue that people were talking about earlier!

So--IF the IP address in conflict was a 10.x IP address, my question would be, at that point, is it because the router is physically at Cisco, or because the network both the laptop and the router are plugged into is for Cisco. I hope I'm making sense. But not knowing the technology of networking very well, I have a hard time ASKING the question I mean to ask.

 

[ncsu95]

I am more inclined to agree with gritguy who has seen more than one jury and believes that just as soon as you think you have the jury figured out, you haven't. (Those are my words, not his. I'm paraphrasing.) Remember that they have not had a chance to discuss any of this. None know what the others are thinking.

That's true. So I think we can't read anything into the note because none of us no a dang thing what is going through their mind.

 

[sunshine05]

There is definitely something we are missing from the testimony. We have been discussing Duplicate IP errors but what was said several times was IP Mismatch error which seems to be something different.

What I'm not understanding is how the error information on the laptop is tracing back to the router.

My husband changed our router today and I just looked at the event logs (thanks macd for explaining how to find them) and didn't see anything indicating a router change so I asked him why it isn't showing up and he said he disabled something, configured something and put the new one on so nothing will show. ??? I have no idea.

At first I was thinking the router change itself caused the IP error, but it's all really vague, isn't it? I wish we had more details.

 

[Cheyenne130]

Someone mentioned something about a 4 hour offset in logs during the "FBI" testimony. I don't know what that was about or have any more information. But if that is correct, could it be 6:21 PM and he still be at work?

I think that has to do with the UTC. The time was listed as military time -4:00. The same thing was discussed during the direct of JW by Kurtz.

 

[sunshine05]

Click on Control Panel, System and Maintenance, Administrative Tools, Event Viewer. This is the Windows Event Viewer. To see the System Events, click on System in left column.

Does anyone have any Duplicate IP Address Events in their log?

No, but would it actually read that way or is that a code?

 

[Cheyenne130]

Just a "what if" question. I haven't heard anything about the specific IP address either, just trying to figure out what people will argue as the information comes out, and trying to see how it fits in with the VPN issue that people were talking about earlier!

So--IF the IP address in conflict was a 10.x IP address, my question would be, at that point, is it because the router is physically at Cisco, or because the network both the laptop and the router are plugged into is for Cisco. I hope I'm making sense. But not knowing the technology of networking very well, I have a hard time ASKING the question I mean to ask.

You are making total sense. I have to say from my perspective that the only way that a conflict could occur with a 10.x address, it had to occur at work. At 10:21 on Friday night at home, the conflict between the laptop and the router could not be a 10.x address no matter where the router was located.

 

[ncsu95]

Click on Control Panel, System and Maintenance, Administrative Tools, Event Viewer. This is the Windows Event Viewer. To see the System Events, click on System in left column.

Does anyone have any Duplicate IP Address Events in their log?

What is the event ID number?

 

[WolfpackWoman]

You are making total sense. I have to say from my perspective that the only way that a conflict could occur with a 10.x address, it had to occur at work. At 10:21 on Friday night at home, the conflict between the laptop and the router could not be a 10.x address no matter where the router was located.

Thank you! That's exactly what I was asking.

And to respond to the earlier poster, asking if there were any IP Address conflicts in my logs--I do have one, but it doesn't seem very useful, because it doesn't include the IP address, or the associated mac address!

"The system detected an address conflict for IP address 0.0.0.0 with the system having network hardware address 00-00-00-00-00-00. Network operations on this system may be disrupted as a result."

 

[ncsu95]

There is definitely something we are missing from the testimony. We have been discussing Duplicate IP errors but what was said several times was IP Mismatch error which seems to be something different.

What I'm not understanding is how the error information on the laptop is tracing back to the router.

Apparently the log gave the mac address of the hardware with the IP conflict. That mac address is the mac address of the 3825 router.

 

[ncsu95]

I think that has to do with the UTC. The time was listed as military time -4:00. The same thing was discussed during the direct of JW by Kurtz.

Could it come into play here?