Let's also give a reply to all those bullet points, to be fair:
A. I don't think they tried to rule him out as a suspect
B. But since the police didn't investigate beyond him we don't know who else did, but there have been a couple of other witnesses they seem to have had also.
C. They didn't look for any other suspects, yes, I think there were other viable suspects.
D. What is a coincidence in this case? A lot of the coincidences seem to be over inflation of everyday tasks to me.
E. I think on this one you are being overly simplistic since we know the laptop, while in LE custody has other errors, then there is always that pesky erased cell phone of NCs.
F. You have no idea where she shopped for meat.
G. Eye Witnesses may not always be reliable, but there times they are reliable, I don't think we can discount them.
H. I am not sure about that happening with less evidence, but I am not going to go look it up - we will have to agree to disagree on that one.
I. The comment you made is the type that slays me. There is no proof that he did do it, but you want us to believe since there is no proof he didn't that that then means he is guilty. There is no proof that any of us are child molesters either, does that mean because that because there is no proof we aren't that we should all be arrested? We can't say, oh, proof doesn't matter, but since you can't prove you didn't do it that is on you. That is not how it works. The ones making the accusation have to offer up the proof, not the other way around.
I have doubts about how bad her marriage was. She made couple plans for her and BC to spend the evening with another couple for Saturday night. The realtor says he called her but there has been no proof of that, but she had not called her divorce attorney she had on retainer for months - don't you think if she was going to move out suddenly she would have called her attorney also? Then there is JP and his weirdness.
I have questions and they have not been answered in this trial to my satisfaction to say he is guilty.