Dunno, She got served with the Emerg Custody change at 915, went and obtained Holiman as attny for the theft chg filed at 1 something and 2 something she electronically filed for divorce. Funny thing on that, I noticed that AL sent the Response paperwork to Holiman ! AND set himself up a transport from prison to court
Not sure why the Aug 27th date.. prob got coached from the lawyer, but she filed it pro se also. AL has also asked for time to conduct discovery ... sounds interesting... Wonder where he gonna get it from? lol
Can you tell us how you came to the conclusion she obtained a lawyer the day she was served with emerg custody change paperwork? Is that reported somewhere I missed? You have a link? Just asking because I happen to know you are 100% misinformed. Are you saying the theft charge was filed at 1 on same day as the emerg custody paperwork? Your post is confusing me. If that is what you are saying then Naw, misinformed AGAIN.
Are you stating that CL filed divorce paperwork electronically at 2? Again, I'm confused by your post. IF that is what you are saying then Naw, misinformed AGAIN!
Aug 27th date coached by the lawyer? MOre assumptions? You have a link? The fact that she filed it pro se would mean no lawyer was involved with that document.
I'm sure if AL is representing himself pro se then he has every right to discovery just like an attorney would be able to get. He is now in fact his own attorney. I don't like him nor care for his antics but I darn well support his right to a FAIR trial. Regardless of what my personal thoughts are of him.
Let me help you out here:
9/29 CL charged with Theft by Receiving
A few days later she meets with lawyer and he takes her case (I do not remember the exact date but I remember it being a day or two after the charge when she told me she had met with him and he was pro bono on her case)
10/15 Ex files for emergency custody
10/16 Judge signs ex parte order (note court shows this as ex "orate" order) and assigns a court date of October 21 @ 11:00 a.m.
10/17 CL served at her home @9:15 a.m. (posting date of the court shows 10/20 @ 8:44 a.m. but actual doc shows service on 10/17 @ 9:15 a.m.) This document also shows she is to appear in court on 10/21 @ 11:00 a.m. for a court hearing on the matter
10/17 @1:13 p.m. date the court posted entry of appearance of Holiman as her attorney on TBR charge (does not mean this is date he got on case just date court entered information into system as can be seen in example above) It is also of reference that his name does not show as the attorney of record on her divorce from AL yet as you pointed out clearly he is and AL is aware of this fact because you posted this is who AL served with his answer to the divorce paperwork. He is also attorney who represented her in custody issue on Oct 21 court appearance, as his name appears on some of that paperwork as has been pointed out by others on this board YET mysteriously his name does not show as attorney of record BUT I bet Butler will confirm that he was one that appeared in court with her on 10/21. Also his name does not show as attorney of record on her criminal case of kidnapping/murder yet I clearly remember him being interviewed the day after she was arrested as her attorney of record. Just pointing out that things aren't always correct in the court system.
10/21 @ 11:00 a.m. hearing on custody and CL was told to take urine test and come back to court at 1:00 p.m. with results to get daughter back
10/21 @ 1:18 the second 1/2 of the hearing was cancelled due to urine test false positive result and her being told to get hair follicle test and that hearing would be rescheduled as soon as hair follicle results came back
10/30 CL arrested
11/13 this hearing was cancelled but was supposed to be hearing she was to get her daughter back after passing the hair follicle test.
<Mod Snip>