Hello All,
Random thoughts... Just ignore me if you aren't in the mood for blathering

Its late, I'm just sitting here thinking.
Kat, my looking at the family geneology (history) was just fact finding to see if I could figure out the age of those named as the appelants. i.e. thinking...would an 80 year old in a lawsuit due to an alleged wrongful death of their mother a) make and plant a bomb or b) hire someone to do it. I don't think so, but... BTW, the names of the appelants and their ages were fairly nicely found in an online geneology document

I feel pretty sure those were the appelants after doing some trekking around.
Well, the appelants weren't 80, they were in their 70s. I know some spunky 70 year olds that could throw a huge fit if they lost a fortune that they planned to get in a lawsuit. But, would they really be the angry ones, angry enough to do that? Maybe...
I then thought of the children or other relatives who might be inheritors if these appelants got the big bucks. Maybe they knew that they would be getting something too, if this court case was won. Maybe when it wasn't won, they were mad enough that they set out to bomb the doctor.
I didn't want to say too much along those lines last night. Inevitably when something horrible like this happens, everyone is looked at and they might have nothing to do with the deal. In the meanwhile, they are looked at in a negative/questioning way.
I did find a child in a nearby town (a teen) that appeared to have the "family name" so to speak. I don't know if the child is related, but there were some unique things about the name. This child recovered from a nearly lethal childhood sickness. I didn't want to say too much, God only knows what the child and their family have been through. On the other hand, I asked myself, even if a parent had a very ill child, it wouldn't mean they were beyond doing bad things (like a bombing.) I wondered if the parent of the child (perhaps a relative of the appelants) had any war/bombing training. In fact I wondered if the one appelant did.
The whole tire thing is interesting. Someone put that there KNOWING the doctor would have to move it. The car he drives is not high off the ground I don't think, so it wasn't likely he would drive over the tire and risk getting it stuck underneath the car, dragging it. He didn't have much room in that driveway to swing around it (if my memory serves me well), so whoever put that tire there KNEW someone would have to move it to drive out. Now you'd think, they would figure the man's wife wouldn't move it, but that the man would be called to move it.
Thinking, clever bomber? They figured the doctor would not think, "This looks like a setup, how the he** did that tire get there?" And of course, if he had reason to believe someone meant to do him harm, why would he touch it? No...whoever put it there probably figured the doctor would think someone lost a tire. What would the doctor think... Someone didn't just drive by and have one of their tires roll off their car, that would have made a commotion on that street, seems to me. So, maybe he thought it rolled off something that was carrying it? Even that seems odd...
Which then leads me to thinking about was this a tire with a rim, or a tire without a rim, i.e. just a hollow tire. Now, that explosion was a whopper and the doctor got hit with schrapnel. Somehow I don't think the shrapnel was from the car, although it might have been. Maybe the schrapnel was from the rim exploding.
When I look at the car damage, I think of the concussion of the bomb and maybe even the tire hitting it, i.e. the gust of air from the explosion going through the front grill and blowing up the hood. Maybe the tire or parts of it hitting the front of the car, then breaking it into pieces with a reverberation of the concussion knocking pieces back at the doctor. On the other hand, which way was the doctor blown? He was found in a flower bed?
So was the schrapnel from a rim or the front of the car or both. Which leads to did the tire have a rim. If it didn't, can an empty tire have a powder in it, then a liquid in a cup and when the tire is straightened upward the cup tips and the powder and liquid are explosive. Somehow I'm thinking that there was a rim on that tire... Would a hollow tire exploding do that much damage? Maybe so... If there was a rim, maybe they can identify it somehow.
And what kind of bomb was this, motion set it off maybe (like the rolling of a tire with explosives in it that mixed during the rolling)? Or was there something just under that rim that couldn't be seen, and when the tire was lifted off it, that set off the bomb (it released something, or it pulled a string or or ?)
But back to the drugs... Do you think that if a doctor was doling out oxycontin and demerol and collecting thousands of dollars in their office and not seeing the people coming in (i.e. they were coming for scripts), and some of the other things that doctor who was suspended was accused of doing, do you think there were some people getting drugs from that doctor that they, in turn, were selling? taking? taking/selling? Could this piss some big drug dealers off enough to bomb a doctor who might be a tie breaking vote on whether or not their source's license would be forever suspended? (was anything like that on the agenda?) Stopping someone from selling drugs puts a big dent in a big income. And...evidently there was at least one rumor I saw at an odd site (someone commenting on a news article) that said that this didn't seem to be the first time this doctor was suspected of doing this type of thing. Not being able to sell when you've done it for a long time ain't a happy thing and could surely peeve a few people off. Aside from that, there were comments in a number of articles mentioning "this thing just keeps growing and growing" (talking about the doctors suspension, but more like the drugs and people involved, I think.)
Maybe someone acted "for" someone who was going to be nailed today or tomorrow maybe in the board meeting. Maybe they figured the best way to get the meeting called off would be to damage the board's chair.
I must say that some of the comments noted in some of the articles about the one doctor who had their license suspended for alleged drug dealing were very out of order, i.e. like the person had no conscience whatsoever, like they had a personality disorder that would make them not care less that they were breaking laws or hurting people. Every quote that I read coming from them smacked of a really questionable person, with very questionable morals.
Still a lot more thinking here...rummaging through thoughts...
Wrinks