- Joined
- Apr 26, 2022
- Messages
- 427
- Reaction score
- 3,480
Wait, it was child p..n he was watching??
Wait, it was child p..n he was watching??
Ok, phew, it was mentioned on the live YouTube a bit ago, but must be wrong. Thank you!I doubt it. That couldn't have been ignored.
Where did he move?Fingers crossed but if the leniency shown Christopher by this Court including denying the $1M bond requested by the State, the lack of monitoring, moving to a different county during the pretrial period, living with two witnesses and a Hawaiian vacation! doesn’t give me much hope.
It makes me very very worried that he is going to get a softball sentence.
his wife is gorgeous, there will be guys around who will legitimately contribute to the family's coffers through marriage, should she divorce this creep.
I sincerely hope that Mom and girls get to experience a loving family life with 2 mature adults pulling the wagon so to speak
Where did he move?
They moved to Phoenix. I’m pretty sure they weren’t comfortable in the Marana neighborhood anymore with neighbors who spoke to reporters and some who said they called LE to fill them in on things they had seen & heard. Even the neighbor who kept the girls following them finding Parker in the car spoke out against him to a reporter.Where did he move?
Possibly but I think the bottom line was Christopher didn’t want to die in prison. If he was convicted of Murder 1 his sentence was going to be 25 years to Life, the Child Abuse carried another 15 to 24, so about 17 on top of 25 (minimum). No time off for good behavior. 42 years minimum. This was a good deal for Christopher.Why should his wife need a new man or any man? She could just focus on herself and her two living daughters now.
I am actually surprised that he pled guilty, after quite a bit of the evidence was ruled inadmissible. I wonder if there was something still admissible that he didn't want coming out at trial.
[/QUOTE][QUOTE="Herat, post: 19581577, member:
>>She may received advice from her employer that they were getting complaints from people who refused to use her as their anesthesiologist, and her employer was finding she was not useful, threatening her job.<<
I wouldn't want MY life in her hands under anesthesia. She has, in my opinion, a criminal disregard for the lives and wellbeing of her own tiny dependent children. How can she be counted on to not have disregard for any human being? I wouldn't trust the life of my pet cactus with her, would you?
>>She may also realize he is always going to be a problem in their lives.<<
Frankly, SHE is the biggest problem in "their" lives. She could have done something sbout this long long ago. She's known since way back in the days of his (and her's) disregard for the life of her stepdaughter, Chris's first child. She defended him. Over and over. It makes me wonder about their coming together story. I hope his ex wife speaks up after he"s locked in his cage.
Then she did nothing more than whine at him for his deadly addictions and habits that endangered her daughter's lives over and over and over again. She never stepped in to protect her children. Thats abusive. She should be charged.
She showed signs of being deeply codependent and enabling at the same time. Her petting him while he's being arrested so shortly after roasting her daughter to death was nauseating and showed that he's just another child to her, a man baby with homicidal disregard for anyone but himself. She should be screened for addictions herself. And she shouldn't have people under anesthesia under any circumstances, at least not until she's been screened and had treatment herself and shows some degree of fitness.
Personally, I don’t believe he feels remorse at all. But he’s also apparently not that much of an idiot to take his chances. Anyone who has watched the remote body cam video of him that day, the whole disgusting display of total disregard for his dying daughter and utter self-absorption, as well as read any of the testimony of the previous Daughter knows that this guy was toast, his attorney knew it, and I think convinced him it was in his best interest to take a plea. I am sure the jury would have found him as despicable and unsympathetic as I have.I am thoroughly shocked he accepted the plea deal. I thought he would've thought with such a long guaranteed time in prison on the table, that it would be worth going for the chance at an acquittal or even lesser charge, however small that chance might have been. It makes me think maybe he does actually feel some appropriate remorse. I wonder if his attorney advised him to accept. I also wonder if a different (better) attorney would tell him to reject it.
She can certainly have her pick - this time it’d better be a responsible guy. Or if not - just don’t let your bad boys close to the kids. And try not to breed with men with a maturity level under 10.Personally, I don’t believe he feels remorse at all. But he’s also apparently not that much of an idiot to take his chances. Anyone who has watched the remote body cam video of him that day, the whole disgusting display of total disregard for his dying daughter and utter self-absorption, as well as read any of the testimony of the previous Daughter knows that this guy was toast, his attorney knew it, and I think convinced him it was in his best interest to take a plea. I am sure the jury would have found him as despicable and unsympathetic as I have.
This is not your typical hot car death, not by a long shot. He repeatedly engaged in what amounts to Russian Roulette with his daughter’s lives. There is plenty of evidence of that that would have been admitted.
I have mixed feelings about the plea. I hoped to have all his misdeeds and bad behaviors brought to light and exposed, particularly so Erika could see and hear it in one fell swoop and she could realize what an absolute low-life loser she has chosen over her daughters and her own mother.
All I can say is I hope the judge doesn’t let him go off on another Hawaiian vacation before he starts serving time. Or that he doesn’t do a runner.
Oh and Erika? Once your hubby is locked up, make better choices.
A lot wouldn't have come out in court.Personally, I don’t believe he feels remorse at all. But he’s also apparently not that much of an idiot to take his chances. Anyone who has watched the remote body cam video of him that day, the whole disgusting display of total disregard for his dying daughter and utter self-absorption, as well as read any of the testimony of the previous Daughter knows that this guy was toast, his attorney knew it, and I think convinced him it was in his best interest to take a plea. I am sure the jury would have found him as despicable and unsympathetic as I have.
This is not your typical hot car death, not by a long shot. He repeatedly engaged in what amounts to Russian Roulette with his daughter’s lives. There is plenty of evidence of that that would have been admitted.
I have mixed feelings about the plea. I hoped to have all his misdeeds and bad behaviors brought to light and exposed, particularly so Erika could see and hear it in one fell swoop and she could realize what an absolute low-life loser she has chosen over her daughters and her own mother.
All I can say is I hope the judge doesn’t let him go off on another Hawaiian vacation before he starts serving time. Or that he doesn’t do a runner.
Oh and Erika? Once your hubby is locked up, make better choices.
Two quick thoughts on their “asset protection”, but I don’t think it would be successful in either situation because the assets are still clearly theirs. However, if the Llc is structured as a trust for the remaining minor children then it could possibly work?do you think she suddenly developed a maternal instinct such that she will finally divorce her manchild? I don't. I suspect this is very much a last ditch effort to engage in asset protection, just puzzled over what she is protecting them from. JMO
as to the BBM Possible. hard to say without knowing a) was CS listed on the deed to the property prior to this restructuring? b) is he a partner, officer or director of the LLC? I don't know that ES could be found civilly liable for the bad acts of her spouse in regard to his oldest daughter. But removing his name from property would probably be recommended if he was on the title to begin with. By forming an LLC, with ES as the only controller of said LLC, might afford her and her girls a layer of protection from folks seeking their pound of financial flesh from Chris.Two quick thoughts on their “asset protection”, but I don’t think it would be successful in either situation because the assets are still clearly theirs. However, if the Llc is structured as a trust for the remaining minor children then it could possibly work?
1. Could taking assets out of their name make them eligible for legal aid? (“If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you”.)
2. Could they be attempting to protect assets in case the oldest daughter sues CS & ES for “damages”?