- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Messages
- 16,170
- Reaction score
- 50,299
I wasn't talking about the comments on the site, I didn't even read the comments - the article is by what is called a "complainer", not a reporter, and definitely not MSM. I wasn't aware that opinion pieces/blogs, were allowed to be discussed as fact. It's difficult enough to find facts in MSM pieces
Since the referenced blog accused these two women of being cons, I simply wanted a more reliable link or source than just someone's opinion. YNWIM?
Labeling the mother and daughter "cons", is ridiculous, imo. Whoever wrote this article is just mouthing off it appears, for no good reason other than to try to shed a negative light on someone other than GG. I don't agree with the mother promoting her teenage daughter in a sexually provocative way whatsoever. Irresponsible, shallow, immoral, absolutely. I just don't get the "con" association. It reminds me of Patsy Ramsey dressing her little girl, Jon Benet, up like a grown woman in a nightclub act. PR was a lot of things including morally reprehensible, imo, but that did not make her a "con". JMO