OK, I am going to go out on a limb here and say (my opinion only)
Since ALE has NEVER confirmed any of these "inconsistent" statements as A....B.....C.... unless and until they are willing to put that specific information out there --How can it be said everything that might prove his innocence is a LIE. I don't get that thinking sooo here is how I see it:
Nanki beach, Baby Beach,Baby Beach Cove, Rocky Point, Rocky Road--yada, yada, yada, are ALL the same I just choose to use Baby Beach Cove in referring to that point.
Whatever reasons ALE have for "the inconsistency statement" does not change the fact that:
The overall account GG has given is "consistent" with Robyn drowning. Any other inconsistencies there may be were not important enough to hold GG any longer than the 4 months he was there. Where I might add he told the same account over a 4 month period.
Now some of his statements might not "make sense" to ALE, but that was not enough in and of itself to hold him in custody let alone charge him with murder. Right?
So we can dissect the literal meaning of sentences and words, but it does not prove that his account is a LIE.
The Ambien story I noted did NOT say the more one uses it the less effect it is, it did say it is addictive. The fact that it doesn't "make sense" that Robin would go snorkeling after taking ambien and alcohol , means nothing, it certainly does not mean it is a lie I am sure to you and I and ALE and the rest of the world it seems like a a stupid thing to do, but people DO STUPID THINGS.
There is no right or wrong about this account it just is what it is, and ALE believes all the stupid actions in the world are CONSISTANT with a drowning in this instance...or they would have charged him.
The fisherman witness was NOT interviewed by ALE, only by MSNBC, any other witness accounts must not have been anything earth shattering , had they been, the theory of accidental drowning for the insurance money would not have been put forth as a motive.
There is one think you have to think about may be guilty of drowning Robyn, yes, but the exact point they went into the water is not worth the time we have spent on it.
SHE went in the water--don't you think ALE would have made sure all evidence consistent with that has been accounted for....meaning all of her belongings relating to a "swim" were accounted for. The dress, her keys, her shoes , her purse, etc. There would be cause for concern if those things were "all missing", leading one to believe she had them on when she was "murdered, now that would be an "inconsistency" you could call GG a liar over.
OK---sorry for the rant, but it becomes tedious arguing over some of these things, do you realize we spent an entire two days of posting on "where they went into the water", Yikes--it doesn't matter, they did in spite of rocks, craters,fish, no fish, caves no caves, current, no current, sneakers, no sneakers, cut toe, no cut toe, hair extensions, makeup the whole ball of wax--they still seem to have overcome ALL of those obstacles and got into that water.
