- Joined
- May 21, 2012
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 2,248
The forensics taking time could be a reason to delay arrest but then why the presser? Unless it's to put pressure on them to confess instead.
If one grandma was responsible for the death, and the other helped cover it up. Then perhaps the aim was to create a divide between the two, in the hopes one would talk? But that would mean one suspect (of original crime) and one suspect of cover up. In that case would the police have specified two suspects..
ImO
IMO primary reason for presser:-
- having executed search warrants, seized evidence, ordered forensic anaylsis, informed SM or JM that they are a suspect, resulting in both of them engaging lawyers in response, it is then only a matter of time before something is leaked to the press and all hell breaks loose especially at the Daily Mail.
- presser and all the background info ensures SAPOL control the messaging before anything leaks out to press through other sources.
Secondary reasons
- I’m sure SAPOL are under extreme pressure to show results after all the resources and expenses thrown at this.
- put pressure on suspect and witnesses and perhaps also flush out any more new info from witnesses that were giving family members the “benefit of the doubt”.
Also I’m not sure the motor bike shown at the presser was the one siezed. The AI data analysis only revealed one human, compared to showing thousands of animals, and then they zeroed in on that one human who happens to be on a motorbike to simply show how clever the AI analysis is. It may have been a family member working on the day or some other worker in the area / neighbouring property? I don’t think there much relevance of the photographed motor bike to the seized motor bike but it may indeed be the same one…
IMO only
Last edited: