Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

[SouthAussie]

Thank you but even in this article, what they claim the unnamed 'top boss' said does not match their headline. They claimed he said 'two' but the 'quoted' words said 'members'. If there was more information from actual quotes, then they should've published it, not random words here and there that don't support their headline. It makes me very wary of trusting anything they publish. JMO.

Yes. The 'top boss' (Police Commissioner Grant Stevens) didn't say it. A police spokesperson did.

The police commissioner said "members" and the police spokesperson said "two family members". And the spokesperson wouldn't comment on "further suspects".
(which doesn't mean there are or there are not further suspects, just means they aren't talking about the case. imo).

ABC had the radio interview with the Police Commissioner. This is what they said.


Today, Police Commissioner Grant Stevens told ABC Radio Adelaide "members" of the family were "not cooperating" with police.

"As far as I'm aware, it's status quo, from the most recent reports. We are still working with Gus's mum and dad and there are other members of the family who are no longer cooperating,"

Following Commissioner Stevens's interview, an SA Police spokesperson confirmed "that two family members are only communicating [with police] via their legal representatives".

When asked by the ABC if there were any further suspects, a police spokesperson said they were "unable to make any further comment at this point".

Two members of Gus Lamont's family 'not cooperating' directly with police

South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case.

www.abc.net.au

 

[Dotta]

Thank you but even in this article, what they claim the unnamed 'top boss' said does not match their headline. They claimed he said 'two' but the 'quoted' words said 'members'. If there was more information from actual quotes, then they should've published it, not random words here and there that don't support their headline. It makes me very wary of trusting anything they publish. JMO.

Pardon?

"Unnamed top boss" according to OP???

They are quoting SA Police Commissioner by name:

"South Australian Police Commissioner Grant Stevens has told ABC Radio Adelaide
that 'members' of the youngster’s family were 'no longer co-operating with efforts to locate him'."

IMO
It is important to read the whole article.

I don't see any "random words" (quoting OP)

Quoting marks in text mean DIRECT SPEECH.

JMO

Link once again:

https://www.news.com.au/national/south-australia/police-boss-blasts-gus-lamont-family-members/news-story/2e948f713ecf12c4829d66be8a23cc31

Oh well...
Let anyone think whatever....
After all,
it is not my business what others' opinions are hehe
People interpret the same thing differently and we have no control over it.
That's life.

IMO

 

[_sleuthdog_]

Moo... Jesse would know how her parents care take and discipline. I could not leave my child with my parents ever...I feared them. Jesse seemed to trust her parents..or maybe not now?...since Gus is still missing...but usually you would know if your parents were lying.
..moo

Moo..they have lawyers. Say nothing is what is advised
Jesse was there, she would know if anything was off with either of them..moo
.

A small thing but respectfully, it’s Jess or Jessica, not Jesse.

 

[mickey2942]

I thought of the dog attack possibility but dismissed it largely because I assumed there’d have been evidence of that - ie bloodstains, disturbance in the area, etc.

Now, that is interesting. No matter what occurred, wouldn't there have been some evidence?

The tineline is crucial. Because if Gus was still alive when Josie and Jess left, and Gus died during that time frame, what did Shannon do with Gus's body? Did she dispose of it? Or did she tell Josie, when they got home, and Josie disposed of the body, under the guise of "searching" for Gus?

 

[_sleuthdog_]

I’ll throw some other random thought in - …

What if the inconsistency with timeline and version of events is actually not what happened at the station. What if SM was looking after Gus and brother over the course of the day and she took the boys out for a drive - eg to get supplies, out on an adventure - and the issue is with her story changed on where she went and when or that it doesn’t line up with someone else’s account of the outing (or that she went at all)? This might also explain why no evidence of Gus at the station. Did he vanish while elsewhere? This might also explain the parents’ recent plea to public for any information.

Edit - I realise that this might be timeline information that we would have already known about but what if the story has only surfaced in more recent follow up questioning?

Just speculating / thinking out loud.

 

[Ruminations]

Moo... Jesse would know how her parents care take and discipline. I could not leave my child with my parents ever...I feared them. Jesse seemed to trust her parents..or maybe not now?...since Gus is still missing...but usually you would know if your parents were lying.
..moo

Money can always be a realistic issue, limiting child care options. But, I agree. Jess was not a baby having babies. And she had years of adulthood to reflect on the parenting style she experienced and others experienced. There has been no reason to think she would go tend sheep if it put her children at risk.

This case flummoxes me, because it appears to be a murder, IMO. 4 year olds are quite vulnerable to accidental deaths compared to people a bit younger or older. Tthey are fairly independent, so they are trusted more than younger children. (When he wakes up, he'll get out of the car and come in for lunch.)

But it can be a mistake to trust four year olds. They slip in and out of fantasy so easily, which can make them afraid or unafraid at the wrong times. Their judgement is tainted. (I'm wearing my magic cape!)

Yet, it does not seem at all as if this is a situation is a horrific 4 year old accident. The extreme scene cleanup doesn't add up. The circumstances, if they showed poor parenting judgement, it could be minimized. (Ex: they could claim a poison was just taken off a high shelf and left out a moment, the baby cried, and Gus ate it right away. Instead of admitting to routinely leaving the poison in his reach and trusting him not to consume it.)

And, it appears that the apparent lie about Gus playing in a dirt mound itself almost admits to more than people might. A half hour unchecked is a long time for a four year old. It would be the amount of time that might elapse if, say, the parent fell asleep with the baby. Which I could easily see happening. I would imagine a person would at first say that they just closed their eyes for a minute, before coming to the realization that they slept quite a bit while the baby napped. And then, I'd expect LE to tell trackers and searchers the 1/2 hour truth, while telling the public the parent dozed off.

It strikes me as a long time to not look at Gus in between caring and caring for the little brother and cooking dinner, which I believe is what was said. I think it's weird that the apparent lie is a longer time than I think a four year old would be left alone without being glanced upon by a parent who is awake.

Then, if you're going to lie that Gus was playing in the pile, which I do believe would entertain a child his age longer than most activities, why not put the things I bet he'd have with him on that pile of dirt? Sticks, rocks, buckets, shovels? Why say he was wearing boots, when they would quickly become irritatingly filled with dirt and be removed, most likely?

Nothing about this case makes sense.

MOO