- Joined
- May 2, 2018
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 350
I’ve always wondered if the sand pile caved in on him. Seemed an unsafe place to play IMO
Yes, WS is victim friendly. IMO the rules in this area serve the purpose of keeping rumour and unbridled victim blaming out and credible sources in, as well as keeping the threads on topic. Credible sources are certainly LE ( unless properly sourced msm reports otherwise) and WS is LE supportive.As you may know, until someone is identified by LE as a suspect or POI, it is literally against WS rules to suggest they are guilty. Especially family members.
It's not that no one here suspected this might be the outcome, but that it's not permitted to say so on WS in advance of LE designation.
Where did you read that? Link please, thanks.I recall reading that there was conflict between Gus’ father and JM, which is why he didn’t live on the property. That Jess still did while the grandparents had primary custody could point to a very controlling coercive family dynamic, imo.
Totally agree with this. It’s like the police have had to tiptoe on glass in this case.I still have a feeling that the family were treated far differently than your average family who had a missing child under strange circumstances, by the Police. It felt that the family had been given protection? I would have thought a search warrant would have been issued immediately and wouldn’t need special permission, especially as it is such a mysterious case? IMO
I still think this is possible, or another accident. The trampoline was in a crazy position...
I wonder if the grandparent is being held in custody?
IMO
“Superintendent Fielke said the suspect was not one of Gus’ parents.”
““I can’t give you any more information about the suspect or where the suspect is and why that person is a suspect.”
I think the suspect would have to have been arrested to be in custody?
imo
You're absolutely right. I remember reading that at some point. It's awful when these things happen but even worse when there are other circumstances like the fact that he was not going to be there much longer that break my heart even more. Almost preventable (whatever happened).Oh wow, just learning about this. How awful. Poor little Gus, what on earth happened here to lead to this crime? Major crime, not accident?
I was always a bit perplexed by Dad and JM having a seemingly major issue, and his words about the dangerous conditions there.
My God, wasn't Gus to move in with his father in the near future, for school, or am I wrong about that.
Like I said above I can’t recall but I’ll get back to you when I find it.Where did you read that? Link please, thanks.
Oh wow, just learning about this. How awful. Poor little Gus, what on earth happened here to lead to this crime? Major crime, not accident?
Right. But I've also seen cases where fathers or uncles have been unfairly accused, with lots of horrid untrue accusations. It's devastating for a father to be attacked online when it was really a pervert that killed his child.I don’t know why that always happens here. We all know the stats - it’s nearly always a close family member.
Think you might struggle to find it.Like I said above I can’t recall but I’ll get back to you when I find it.
Maybe the Son-in-law is innocent. I feel very suspicious but I could be wrong.
Police don't need new evidence to seek a search warrant. They only need to convince a magistrate or JP they had enough to issue a search warrant.They would have only been granted a warrant if new information came to light, imo - which seemed to occur on January 10.
FWIW I remember reading that too, way, way back in the case.Like I said above I can’t recall but I’ll get back to you when I find it.