Australia Australia - Chantelle, 27, and Leela McDougall, 6, Toni Popic, 40, Nannup, 13 July 2007

  • #441
Hmm... Busy week for HP fans in Nannup. The mind reels...

This is from the July 2007 Nannup Telegraph. Sorry for the cropped edges.

1501e3eb21b3861888af44923f5b00ab.jpg
 
  • #442
I found a couple of things in the telegraph about Nannup Hotel events. I need to review the doco but it did say Chantelle worked here also. Doco also mentioned how Simon was very jealous of this particular gig.

c5423b9c032d5553b7bab2c075f957f4.jpg
d3400e97c261f511197b091669f0f278.jpg


So she had 3 part-time jobs:
Fish and chips
Swimming lessons
Nannup Hotel

How does that affect Centrelink payments (assuming the payments are for Leela)?

If she worked full-time and made enough to live above the poverty line would she still get them?
I wouldn't be surprised if she worked for cash. Not reporting income to Centrelink. Many small businesses used to get away with paying cash off the books. Saves them paying workers compensation insurance and payroll tax and the workers get to fiddle Centrelink..
Nowadays it'd be much more difficult, as Centrelink is a wake up to these scams.
Also she could still get a partial supporting parent payment and health care card if she only worked 3 days a week and earnt less than a threshold amount. She would still get a smaller family assistance payment (different thing) for Leela anyway. The health care card on it's own is worth a fortune in discounted travel, utility rebates, cheap medicines, bulk billing (free medical treatment), cheap government housing or rental assistance payments and anywhere that offers pensioner discounts. It would've been worth it for the group to fiddle Centrelink under Gary's orders if his books didn't sell.
 
  • #443
I wouldn't be surprised if she worked for cash. Not reporting income to Centrelink. Many small businesses used to get away with paying cash off the books. Saves them paying workers compensation insurance and payroll tax and the workers get to fiddle Centrelink..
Nowadays it'd be much more difficult, as Centrelink is a wake up to these scams.

That is what I suspected. Cash under the table simplifies many of these issues here also.



Sent from my LG-H740 using Tapatalk
 
  • #444
The Nannup Telegraph is a very interesting local paper.

It might be worth delving through. Here are the sort of articles you’ll see:

*

eba2d0ebbe0de97271210f0c38770ae8.jpg

FROM
https://web.archive.org/save/_embed/http://telegraph.nannupcrc.com.au/2007/june2007/*Page 6.

GWADWcapture.jpgWCnannupboreCapture.jpg

Water Corporation's Nannup Bore 1-07 are associated with location IDs 60900187 and 60900193 on the Dept of Water data server groundwater map. They were both drilled in November 2007, only one was completed (I suspect). Nearly zero free publicly-available data. The other two wells north of Rinns (Thomas) are household/ domestic wells.

The large water tank on the upper left quadrant of the Google Earth image correlates to this well location. This well is part of the Bridgetown Regional Water Supply Project.

Capture3.jpg

https://www.watercorporation.com.au...ts/warren-blackwood-rwss-map-october-2013.pdf
 
  • #445
Area of WaterCorp bore/s
60c3da3bf8f9a274fbb74679c8887a7f.jpg

Lot 62 = #20
 
  • #446
Area of WaterCorp bore/s
60c3da3bf8f9a274fbb74679c8887a7f.jpg

Lot 62 = #20
Yep. Close indeed. However, I honestly don't see how the presence of one nearby public supply well would devalue one's property unless the wells are completed in the same aquifer and the cone of depression from the public supply well pulls the water below ones pump. (It happens, thus we have production-associated spacing rules). It can be expensive to deepen a well. I have not yet determined the aquifer or the pumping volume so am unable to confirm or invalidate. Another day perhaps.

Turns out this was not drilled for the notorious evil grab for Perth municipal supply but I have noticed that WaterCorp is proceeding more at a slow creep. Shire of Nannup continues to be concerned that any potential local Yarragadee pumping could be detrimental to Blackwood River base flows. This issue has been voiced at recent stakeholders meetings. I don't have the link at the moment and it's not particularly relevant to the case at hand.

Perhaps lot 62 was desperate to sell for reasons that extend beyond what was broadcast on the interwebz. Paranoia would be my first guess.
 
  • #447
Yep. Close indeed. However, I honestly don't see how the presence of one nearby public supply well would devalue one's property unless the wells are completed in the same aquifer and the cone of depression from the public supply well pulls the water below ones pump. (It happens, thus we have production-associated spacing rules). It can be expensive to deepen a well. I have not yet determined the aquifer or the pumping volume so am unable to confirm or invalidate. Another day perhaps.

Turns out this was not drilled for the notorious evil grab for Perth municipal supply but I have noticed that WaterCorp is proceeding more at a slow creep. Shire of Nannup continues to be concerned that any potential local Yarragadee pumping could be detrimental to Blackwood River base flows. This issue has been voiced at recent stakeholders meetings. I don't have the link at the moment and it's not particularly relevant to the case at hand.

Perhaps lot 62 was desperate to sell for reasons that extend beyond what was broadcast on the interwebz. Paranoia would be my first guess.
I'lol see if there's any evidence of the Sir_Laughs_a_Lot post that describes lodging a complaint over missing the logging allocation meeting and thus about revaluation of his business and it's sale.
At least then we might have an idea of whether the blogger's accusations of the cult stealing his mail is based upon any fact or is just made up.
In the meantime I google the previous owner's surname but haven't found anything in at Agriculture Department databases associated with a farm in Nannup as blogged about on the hunting forum.
669ab7ee598f9adebbd91fb9763a02cd.jpg
94b416dddc1256490b53e473589e0e98.jpg
 
  • #448
Whitepages for that surname in Nannup doesn't list anything currently. So it confirms that Sir_Laughs_a_Lot moved away from Nannup as per his posts on the Cult Forum.
Whereabouts did the cult stay in Denmark? (before moving to Nannup)
695ca6f2e9f41611f73db17c5720e372.jpg
 
  • #449
Whitepages for that surname in Nannup doesn't list anything currently. So it confirms that Sir_Laughs_a_Lot moved away from Nannup as per his posts on the Cult Forum.
Whereabouts did the cult stay in Denmark? (before moving to Nannup)
695ca6f2e9f41611f73db17c5720e372.jpg

Yes IIRC they did stay at Denmark in Western Australia after traveling from Victoria and before moving to Nannup.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #450
Yes IIRC they did stay at Denmark in Western Australia after traveling from Victoria and before moving to Nannup.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just makes me wonder if Sir_Laughs_a_Lot had relatives in Denmark and crossed paths with the cult earlier than stated in his posts? Seems to go from not knowing them, to blaming them for buggering up his business in a later post. He's all over the place in what he's said regarding his familiarity with the missing group.
 
  • #451
Just makes me wonder if Sir_Laughs_a_Lot had relatives in Denmark and crossed paths with the cult earlier than stated in his posts? Seems to go from not knowing them, to blaming them for buggering up his business in a later post. He's all over the place in what he's said regarding his familiarity with the missing group.

I concur. I think previous posts describing his state of mind are accurate. It is now just a case of how dangerous is/was this individual around the time of the disappearance. Maybe it is time to bring them over to the thread for some questioning. Perhaps the POI is a gentle family man with a bit of time on his hands.

If Kadwell had left the country he would need at least one to four fake passports or have left by sea. He claimed to have the means to leave the country toward the end but so much doesn't stack up with this case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #452
Searched to find anything to confirm Sir_Laughs_a_Lot's posting that attending a “meeting” to be allocated timber getting licenses in 2006 or 2007 was a requirement


Forrest Products Commission Information sheets 2006:

http://media.wix.com/ugd/d772b0_79ad2e1c4d27451da1cac61a139a4889.pdf

General information about Forrest Management Planning on Dept of Parks and Wildlife website:

https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/manageme...reparing-the-forest-management-plan-2014-2023


A Nannup Timber company website

http://www.ntp.net.au/about


The timber value adding company that exists now in Nannup, going by the same name as Sir_Laughs_a_Lot 's alternative user name, Timeless_Timber, on another forum doesn't appear on timber allocation list in 2007, which maybe confirms the veracity of the information posted by Sir_Laughs_a_Lot about missing out on a Timber getting license.>

19/7/2007 HANSARD: FOREST PRODUCTS COMMISSION - JARRAH SALES, CONTRACTS AND OPERATIONAL COSTS*[Questions On Notice]

http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Han...1a71ec/$FILE/C37+S1+20070619+p3231c-3232a.pdf
 
  • #453
I concur. I think previous posts describing his state of mind are accurate. It is now just a case of how dangerous is/was this individual around the time of the disappearance. Maybe it is time to bring them over to the thread for some questioning. Perhaps the POI is a gentle family man with a bit of time on his hands.

If Kadwell had left the country he would need at least one to four fake passports or have left by sea. He claimed to have the means to leave the country toward the end but so much doesn't stack up with this case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As much as I'd like to know, I don't want to have to start a new Topic that has the same headline as that famous one by Gary Hughes in The Australian.
Besides, it would be against TOS, I suppose.
 
  • #454
Yep. Close indeed. However, I honestly don't see how the presence of one nearby public supply well would devalue one's property unless the wells are completed in the same aquifer and the cone of depression from the public supply well pulls the water below ones pump. (It happens, thus we have production-associated spacing rules). It can be expensive to deepen a well. I have not yet determined the aquifer or the pumping volume so am unable to confirm or invalidate. Another day perhaps.

Turns out this was not drilled for the notorious evil grab for Perth municipal supply but I have noticed that WaterCorp is proceeding more at a slow creep. Shire of Nannup continues to be concerned that any potential local Yarragadee pumping could be detrimental to Blackwood River base flows. This issue has been voiced at recent stakeholders meetings. I don't have the link at the moment and it's not particularly relevant to the case at hand.

Perhaps lot 62 was desperate to sell for reasons that extend beyond what was broadcast on the interwebz. Paranoia would be my first guess.

As reported in Hansard on 17/11/2010 the water bore on Thomas Rd in Nannup is only supplying 5 mega litres per day, but has the capacity for supplying 10 to the Bridgetown Regional Water Supply Scheme

http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Han...12b826/$FILE/C38+S1+20101117+p8965b-8965b.pdf

Further info* http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Han...0f7fcf/$FILE/A37+S1+20080408+p1998d-1999a.pdf

*

*

As at 28/6/2007 in Hansard, Sir_Laughs_a_Lot is not listed as one of the landholders consulted about the Yarragadee Aquifer Bore on Thomas Rd, which confirms that he’s sold up and moved on

http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Han...7fcbd4/$FILE/C37+S1+20070628+p3769b-3770a.pdf

There's nothing to indicate that the presence of the bore itself caused anyone to sell up
 
  • #455
Searched to find anything to confirm Sir_Laughs_a_Lot's posting that attending a “meeting” to be allocated timber getting licenses in 2006 or 2007 was a requirement


Forrest Products Commission Information sheets 2006:

http://media.wix.com/ugd/d772b0_79ad2e1c4d27451da1cac61a139a4889.pdf

General information about Forrest Management Planning on Dept of Parks and Wildlife website:

https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/manageme...reparing-the-forest-management-plan-2014-2023


A Nannup Timber company website

http://www.ntp.net.au/about


The timber value adding company that exists now in Nannup, going by the same name as Sir_Laughs_a_Lot 's alternative user name, Timeless_Timber, on another forum doesn't appear on timber allocation list in 2007, which maybe confirms the veracity of the information posted by Sir_Laughs_a_Lot about missing out on a Timber getting license.>

19/7/2007 HANSARD: FOREST PRODUCTS COMMISSION - JARRAH SALES, CONTRACTS AND OPERATIONAL COSTS*[Questions On Notice]

http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Han...1a71ec/$FILE/C37+S1+20070619+p3231c-3232a.pdf
by the 9/11/2010 3rd*grade Jarrah (firewood) contracts

http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Han...1bf226/$FILE/C38+S1+20101109+p8313b-8314a.pdf

Full list with owner's names>

http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/pub...6b0c9ddc6e16e348257a5b000a09b6/$file/4806.pdf

If this is associated with Sir_Laughs_a_Lot's posts, then it is a pretty big step down if he's on this
 
  • #456
Thanks, petedavo. 5 mega litres is about a 900-1000 gpm well. Bore. Nice well! This production rate sounds like Yarragardee. The nearby domestic wells are likely completed in the shallowest aquifer, so may be Leederville wells or shallow (river) alluvium (superficial). Guessing...
 
  • #457
Yes IIRC they did stay at Denmark in Western Australia after traveling from Victoria and before moving to Nannup.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post-Floreat, so maybe after Leela was born.

Sent from my LG-H740 using Tapatalk
 
  • #458
  • #459
  • #460

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
120
Guests online
2,973
Total visitors
3,093

Forum statistics

Threads
632,571
Messages
18,628,596
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top