Found Deceased Australia - Elisa Curry, 43, Aireys Inlet, Melbourne, 30 Sept 2017 #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
He had last spoken to her at 10.30 the night before.

If there was a rush due to the last conversation it was a pretty slow one....

Yes, what changed between that 10.30pm phone conversation and the dire urgency after arriving at the house at 9am the next morning?
 
He had last spoken to her at 10.30 the night before.

If there was a rush due to the last conversation it was a pretty slow one....

Oh hell yeah slow...did he call her a billion times in the morning, no answer and that became more alarming? If so, truth is I wouldn’t want my kids around a situation.
Wonder if his car has been seen travelling overnight on any cctv... no tolls for the route I believe?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
We have looked at this in other cases. The 48 hour waiting period is not correct, and has not been for quite some time.



Several years ago my partners ex wife who suffers from a mild mental illness went missing. Police and CATT team were alerted immediately and located within 4 hours.
 
This has probably been discussed a million times across this forum but can a phone be traced when switched off.....?
 
Actually wonder what his phone reveals? Locations? Calls? Messages? Even on a day my hubby annoys me we’d exchange half a dozen calls or messages


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
well... so far.. and I mention these events because they are exponentially increasing.. a lot of the original information, which mostly came from the husband in regard to his missing wife are being backpedalled, and/or moved forward.. . the late night run.. the early morning long distance run, running of any description, going to bed at 10.30pm., going for a run at all, perhaps not even contemplating a run, .. perhaps not even being dressed to go for a run, the dog.. missing, having followed her on a run, but now at the neighbors, doesn't run with her usually, certainly doesn't run on a marathon training run. Did he ring her? did she ring him?.. she might take the phone with her, or she did take it with her regularly, .........

That's a lot of mucking about, peoples. .. and.. ( lifted eyebrow ) almost as if the Vic Police ave been sent off on a wild goose chase....all these fallbacks are advantageous to the killer, in so far as it delayed the search, in so far as it seemed to be a huge radius , which widened the search and as the hours wear on, the radius appears to be diminishing, the circle is getting smaller.. it hasn't been to the advantage of Elisa.

The person who knows where the body most likely is, or was , ( it might have been thrown into the sea. .. that current up the Wreckers Coast, from Cape Otway to Torquay is the natural home of the Great White Shark ) is also the person who doesn't want that body found, under any circumstances.. UNLESS there are insurance payouts needed desperately.
 
Nothing weird at all about the husband and kids leaving early Sunday morning. It's not personal posters experience of their kids not getting up at that time ect. To me it's totally plausible, seize the day and make the most of it particularly if Monday was a work day . Get as much out of Sunday as you can.
 
This has probably been discussed a million times across this forum but can a phone be traced when switched off.....?

yes .. it is not impossible, merely sometimes a lengthy procedure... Even when it's turned off. Turning it "off" does not disconnect the GPS. With a showing of probable cause, police can simply obtain a warrant (or both) and serve your service provider and the phone manufacturer. Some experts believe they can do this without a warrant.
 
well... so far.. and I mention these events because they are exponentially increasing.. a lot of the original information, which mostly came from the husband in regard to his missing wife are being backpedalled, and/or moved forward.. . the late night run.. the early morning long distance run, running of any description, going to bed at 10.30pm., going for a run at all, perhaps not even contemplating a run, .. perhaps not even being dressed to go for a run, the dog.. missing, having followed her on a run, but now at the neighbors, doesn't run with her usually, certainly doesn't run on a marathon training run. Did he ring her? did she ring him?.. she might take the phone with her, or she did take it with her regularly, .........

That's a lot of mucking about, peoples. .. and.. ( lifted eyebrow ) all these fallbacks are advantageous to the killer, in so far as it delayed the search, in so far as it seemed to be a huge radius , which widened the search and as the hours wear on, the radius appears to be diminishing, the circle is getting smaller.. it hasn't been to the advantage of Elisa.

The person who knows where the body most likely is, or was , ( it might have been thrown into the sea. .. that current up the Wreckers Coast, from Cape Otway to Torquay is the natural home of the Great White Shark ) is also the person who doesn't want that body found, under any circumstances.. UNLESS there are insurance payouts needed desperately.

In all fairness trooper, their is no "killer" at this stage. Also husband isn't the one saying all these things about runs ect.
 
Hey fellow sleuthers. I had alot of catch up to do.

Want to point out something about the dog being found.

If it was found with its leash still on that would indicate she took it walking/running and something happened and the dog ended up loose.

If it was just as normal with no leash and just a collar, roaming that would indicate it has got out, perhaps accidently by someone leaving a gate open? Not something i would probably think about if i was in a hurry before/during/after a crime.

*robbed a house* "bugger, better shut the gate so their dog doesn't get out".

Just blurting out something on my mind i guess.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
In all fairness trooper, their is no "killer" at this stage. Also husband isn't the one saying all these things about runs ect.

I beg to differ Hbayne.. the information the police have acted upon , the search along the coast road for a running woman, the timing of her habitual runs, the direction, the regularity of the route taken, and so on and so forth, all this information was given by the husband to the police as to the conclusion of her being a missing person needing a search done immediately, which is why helicopters were sent up, boats were sent out, horses and riders dispatched, lines of searchers from the SES and the police thru the scrub.... The search would not, and was not instigated on the advice of neighbors or friends of Mrs Curry, but by the report of Mr Curry and his mysteriously absent wife.

Now in all fairness, HBaynes.. I do find that there is a preponderance of what could fairly and genuinely be called Bad Information having been given to the police. I understand your desire to argue this , if not only with me , but I stick to my comment, with backup.
 
Is it okay to say I'm wondering if there was a hitman involved? :thinking:
 
except he, the husband, worked in a major role for a massive hospitality company and is a board member of the aha, he could have easily have got her a ticket.
My husband can easily get tickets for things - and some of them I have absolutely no interest in. Maybe she, like me, would prefer a quiet night at home rather than surrounded by screaming (some drunk) strangers excited by a ball flying around in the air.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
203
Guests online
695
Total visitors
898

Forum statistics

Threads
625,672
Messages
18,508,160
Members
240,832
Latest member
jonnyd3388
Back
Top