Found Deceased Australia - Karen Ristevski, 47, Melbourne, Vic, 29 June 2016 - #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #641
Could it be to put pressure on someone that they feel is starting to show signs of cracking?

They've closed the shop. I would've considered selling that house if it was heavy in debt, like why would you leave your children to cope with that chore?
It'd be good to know the law as to what you could sell without the other owner be around...probate or murder, only a good lawyer would know those loopholes.
 
  • #642
Whatever words his solicitor chooses, I would imagine. They'll be chosen and constructed very carefully IMO.
When and if he does make a statement. I will be interested in what words and the language he uses.
 
  • #643
Im wondering if this is not simply the police shaking the tree to which nuts fall out first.
The footage clearly shows the vehicle going over the railway line .....

so the car is either heading onto the Diggers Rest -Coimadai Road or it could also make a sharp left into Welcome Road where the son lives ......

the station also has camera's pointing out to the car park which would also show the cars/s directions immediately after crossing the railway line..

Yet they have choosen to omit that footage??

Is it because they want the people that are lying...to know they know...

And them watch them scurry like rats on a sinking ship..

That's my thought at this point...

Justice is coming "Karen".
 
  • #644
  • #645
I thought it was interesting the way the DI said that people had one chance to make a statement, and one chance only.
 
  • #646
Yes, that definitely struck me too, SA. And also this:

[FONT=&quot]Insp. Day also revealed her husband Borce Ristevski “remains a suspect” in the year-long investigation, adding Mr Ristevski had not been shown the vision and was likely only viewing it today.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/20...ain-karen-ristevskis-body#CBMx1zDTU8k4Jh67.99

BBM Surprise strategy? Also a hint that they aren't working closely with Borse, as they would normally do with family, eg the Morcombes.

[/FONT]
I thought it was interesting the way the DI said that people had one chance to make a statement, and one chance only.
 
  • #647
I thought it was interesting the way the DI said that people had one chance to make a statement, and one chance only.
Yes, I wondered if he was implying that an arrest is imminent and to get your two bobs worth in now. How did you interpret it?
 
  • #648
Maybe 'Better you come to us, before we come to you. You only have one chance to 'fess up'.

Perhaps?
Yes, I wondered if he was implying that an arrest is imminent and to get your two bobs worth in now. How did you interpret it?
 
  • #649
I feel he dropped her off at Diggers (already Deceased) and returned at night and was assisted in the disposal.
He would not have been able to do what he did with her during the day. There are too many possibilities of being seen to be dumping her during the day.
His driving into Diggers was a drop off point to sort out later.

My own opinion of course....
 
  • #650
index.jpg Interesting post !!!
 
  • #651
I feel he dropped her off at Diggers (already Deceased) and returned at night and was assisted in the disposal.
He would not have been able to do what he did with her during the day. There are too many possibilities of being seen to be dumping her during the day.
His driving into Diggers was a drop off point to sort out later.

My own opinion of course....

I agree with this theory. He may have stopped at Gisborne, where Karen's last phone signal was made, dumped her there and come back later with an accomplice. The police searched this area extensively which may have been because some evidence was left here eg scent for cadaver dog to trace.
 
  • #652
Maybe 'Better you come to us, before we come to you. You only have one chance to 'fess up'.

Perhaps?

Or it could also mean "if you are covering for someone, now is the time for the truth to come out". Perhaps he was trying to say something that only those implicated would understand. All JMO.
 
  • #653
I feel he dropped her off at Diggers (already Deceased) and returned at night and was assisted in the disposal.
He would not have been able to do what he did with her during the day. There are too many possibilities of being seen to be dumping her during the day.
His driving into Diggers was a drop off point to sort out later.

My own opinion of course....


Karens car caught on cctv at diggers rest at 11:12 and police believe she was hidden in the car.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/la...y/news-story/029696b6c0c93c5fb8777340863339f3

Critically Mr Ristevski’s phone was switched off for two hours between 10.30am and 2pm.
The information led police to focus their search for Mrs Ristevski in the north-west of Melbourne, urging rural owners to check their properties for any signs of disturbance.

He did initially say he was home all day...ruddy cctv.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/a-...i/news-story/114d6958f6ca1b4f6079839367de184a

On the same night, Mr Ristevski's phone was detected by another tower on Calder Highway near Diggers Rest.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/m...ns-in-the-ristevski-case-20170224-gul1zx.html

So was he trying to implicating his ice addict son.
Surely not just popping in to say hi with Karen hidden in the Merc.
Of course AR could not remember where he was that day but police have confirmed his whereabouts from memory. He was a red herring.
 
  • #654
  • #655
Has it ever been confirmed that the Police have returned Karen's car to Borce ? Or anywhere else.
 
  • #656
Has it ever been confirmed that the Police have returned Karen's car to Borce ? Or anywhere else.

The police currently where not going to confirm it either way today. Not sure if any locals have seen it parked in the shed there.
 
  • #657
The police currently where not going to confirm it either way today. Not sure if any locals have seen it parked in the shed there.

I'm pretty sure none of our locals have spotted it. Makes you wonder about forensics found in the car if it hasn't been returned.
 
  • #658
I'm pretty sure none of our locals have spotted it. Makes you wonder about forensics found in the car if it hasn't been returned.

For sure, if they haven't returned it most likely they have found something they can use.
 
  • #659
One of the many interesting comments made by the DI during the press conference.
Reporter: "Do you think that it will ultimately crack this if you could speak to everyone and can rule them all out"
DI: "Yes"
when talking about contacting the owners of similar cars to determine their whereabouts when the cctv footage was taking.
 
  • #660
For sure, if they haven't returned it most likely they have found something they can use.

They obviously can't use any forensic evidence of BR's found in the car, he has already confirmed he drove it that day. They need to prove he was in it at that time, in a different place to where he stated he was, to be able to pin this on him.

Even so he will probably change his story once again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
2,258
Total visitors
2,318

Forum statistics

Threads
632,856
Messages
18,632,613
Members
243,314
Latest member
Wintrrr
Back
Top