Second Photo - I don't believe her behaviour would be acceptable to SG, which makes me think she isn't really his girlfriend.
http://worldredeye.com/2012/07/white-rabbit-pool-party-at-delano-3/
In a funny way I think that is the exact behaviour that attracts controllers - and the same behaviour which they see as needing control over. It attracts and repulses - its the challenge - and when the submission process is complete the controller feels they have 'won' the prize (something that others may want but cant have) - control and complete devotion. Though that doesn't mean they trust that controlled person. The leash will always be short. The controller will try and cover every leak area by isolation, denial of resources such as money, communication, time management. Though the controllers behaviour is not to be questioned or doubted. Yet it should be. They try to force the hand of the controlled into situations where they are tested, and where more control (which is now done through degradation) is necessary. The controlled maybe perfectly submissive yet the controller will place them in the wrong - blame them for being weak or have something 'abnormal' about them - which the controller may have caused - and which the controller will exploit by 'complaining' to friends/family/associates. The strength of character and vivaciousness of the controlled which was once the drawcard for the controller has been coverted and poisoned to the point where the will cannot function adequately for healthy survival through choices, decisions and independence. Their defense mechanisms are dwindled to nothing and fear of retribution is fear enough itself. The controlled persons ammunition has been spent, and they languish in mental/physical pain with very few, if any, options to stop the assault.
Maybe in Lisa's case, this is what happened. But in Lisa's case it seems she may have broken the rule. To let someone know what she was going through. She shattered the controllers illusion and fascarde. (sp?)
That would have infuriated and outed the controller - who would venomously deny everything, trying to regain their (perceived public) image and reputation. They rely on their past 'complaints and concerns' about the controlled person to place the blame squarely on the victim. They wonder how the victim could do this to them (they say this to others), while wanting to quickly discipline the controlled back into submission - shut them up - demean them into altering their confessions - or threaten them in some manner.
No one tells a controller that they are leaving. You just go - and make sure its a long, long way away - you are surrounded by people that know you and know the truth.
I hope Ms Loiuse has good friends down the track.
and I hope that there has been no mention of 'I'll wait for you'.
JMO.
