GUILTY Australia - Lynette Dawson, 34, Sydney, Jan 1982 *Arrest* #4

[nightrider17]

I think JLZ is on the right track - with the Colombo plot - the victim under instigation of the killer - misled his wife where he was, and this was planned out by the Killer.

So after coming back from the Relationship therapist - where the victim (LD is led to believe things between her and husband are now back on track) calls her mother to say everything went well. (But CD had already planned how it would go down).

If LD didn't drink - I don't see why she would make the exception on this occasion - voluntarily.

I actually have no idea - but I feel JLZ is on the right track. MOO

 

[Witness 28]

But as I understand it she did speak to her mother on the phone, that wasn't just a CD lie. Furthermore it was her mother, not Lyn or CD who placed the call, and because it was 1982 I'm going to assume unless told otherwise that it was a call to a landline, so it was definitely received at Lyn's home. I don't know what time the call was; perhaps between 7 and 10; presumably after dinner and not so late that it would be unsociable for her mother to be calling and expect to talk to her. Or do you think that's wrong and it was actually Lyn who made the call to her mother from the venue and pretended to be at home and drunk? Or do you think it wasn't Lyn who spoke to her mother? Or did you see her so late that she could have been in both places that night, though obviously not at the same time?

I've consulted Wikipedia on the Columbo plot, and there it was the victim who placed a call to his wife and (at the instigation of the killer) misled her on his, the victim's, whereabouts. Columbo (season 1) - Wikipedia

She didn't drink her mother said it was strange, that she was drunk even a brother said it was strange. How can you tell you're talking to anyone if they're drunk don't forget it I know who I spoke to who was the woman at home drunk Maybe M
Chris didn't want to put his wife on phone Lynette's mother insisted,

 

[Witness 28]

I think JLZ is on the right track - with the Colombo plot - the victim under instigation of the killer - misled his wife where he was, and this was planned out by the Killer.

So after coming back from the Relationship therapist - where the victim (LD is led to believe things between her and husband are now back on track) calls her mother to say everything went well. (But CD had already planned how it would go down).

If LD didn't drink - I don't see why she would make the exception on this occasion - voluntarily.

I actually have no idea - but I feel JLZ is on the right track. MOO

So right ,someone doesn't drink they're not going to drink , so who was the woman who is drunk on the phone to Lynette mother wasn't Lynette maybe M

 

[Witness 28]

So right ,someone doesn't drink they're not going to drink , so who was the woman who is drunk on the phone to Lynette mother wasn't Lynette maybe M

PD and MD supposed to be on holidays there's no proof they went on holidays, there police interrogation at the time once said caravan one a campervan, tell me the difference between a campervan and caravan you go away on holidays you know what you stayed in ,because Lynette disappeared that time.
So you're going to remember, if you're making stories up like the Dawson's have made all through this whole incident lies and lies, no proof of holiday no pictures

 

[JLZ]

When Chris drugged Lyn on other occasions (according to JC), were they alcoholic drinks he gave her?

 

[Trooper]

NSW passes 'no body, no parole' law

Something for Dawson to think about, his brothers, too.. Particularly applicable to Dawson, as the law has been passed BEFORE his sentence has been gazetted!!... Now.. you could say, what bad luck, he nearly , nearly, so close, sooooooo close to getting away with it, but if he wants to see the Pacific Ocean again, he will have to blab.

This law, as it now stands, means that as long as Dawson hangs on to his ridiculous story, he never sees the light of day again outside a prison wall. Oh well. .. that's the luck of the game. NSW is not the first with this law, so it's not as if it was unexpected to lob up in the timeline somewhere close to this trial.

If there hadn't been Covid, and if there hadn't been the delay to let the public gossip simmer down, and if all the stars in the constellation lined up, Dawson would have been tried , convicted and sentenced under the law as it stood yesterday. where parole didn't rely on producing the body you buried. But no. All these things happened and while this was going on, legislators were toddling along at their own pace, and now they have legislated it, and one of the first, if not the first person to be caught up in the web of this law will be, guess who!. Dawson.

 

[JLZ]

She didn't drink her mother said it was strange, that she was drunk even a brother said it was strange. How can you tell you're talking to anyone if they're drunk don't forget it I know who I spoke to who was the woman at home drunk Maybe M
Chris didn't want to put his wife on phone Lynette's mother insisted,

If I'm going to think somebody impersonated Lyn, I''ll be asking myself who is more likely to be mistaken: her mother, who arguably doesn't know what she sounds like when drunk, or the stranger who'd never seen her before.

 

[Witness 28]

The babysitter testimony was in the trial

Recap on the babysitters
Chris Dawson Paul Dawson would drive around with the two babysitters to other schools ,or Chris and Paul would do PE with boys and girls of the other schools, as both babysitters would be in a room at different schools doing whatever they did giggling...
PD babysitter said C D pD JC and her were in the car ,they went to a venue, Chris Dawson got out of the car went inside come.back.out went to the glovebox took an envelope supposedly money went back insight came back out, and said that's taking care of?

 

[Witness 28]

But, according to her mother, she spoke with her on the phone. Mobile phones weren't a big thing then, so assuming it was the home phone.

If you don't get it you don't get.... it I'm telling you she was not home... I spoke to her at the same time the woman at home was drunk how can you tell who it is... got it

 

[Witness 28]

If I'm going to think somebody impersonated Lyn, I''ll be asking myself who is more likely to be mistaken: her mother, who arguably doesn't know what she sounds like when drunk, or the stranger who'd never seen her before.

Yes someone impersonated Lynn that night Lynette was not home that night ,Lynn didn't drink ,she wasn't drunk ,she was sober as a judge when we spoke at the same time she was supposed to be at home on the phone to her mother... ready for guys, the alibi

 

[TootsieFootsie]

Way back in 1979 and into the 80s, it became all the rage to have a Clayton's drink.
"The drink you have when you're not having a drink"

The sounding sozzled could have been from being drugged.

I doubt very much that her own mother wouldn't know her voice, no matter what the circumstances.

 

[TootsieFootsie]

All these things happened and while this was going on, legislators were toddling along at their own pace, and now they have legislated it, and one of the first, if not the first person to be caught up in the web of this law will be, guess who!. Dawson.

Snookered!

 

[DRT]

NSW passes 'no body, no parole' law

Something for Dawson to think about, his brothers, too.. Particularly applicable to Dawson, as the law has been passed BEFORE his sentence has been gazetted!!... Now.. you could say, what bad luck, he nearly , nearly, so close, sooooooo close to getting away with it, but if he wants to see the Pacific Ocean again, he will have to blab.

This law, as it now stands, means that as long as Dawson hangs on to his ridiculous story, he never sees the light of day again outside a prison wall. Oh well. .. that's the luck of the game. NSW is not the first with this law, so it's not as if it was unexpected to lob up in the timeline somewhere close to this trial.

If there hadn't been Covid, and if there hadn't been the delay to let the public gossip simmer down, and if all the stars in the constellation lined up, Dawson would have been tried , convicted and sentenced under the law as it stood yesterday. where parole didn't rely on producing the body you buried. But no. All these things happened and while this was going on, legislators were toddling along at their own pace, and now they have legislated it, and one of the first, if not the first person to be caught up in the web of this law will be, guess who!. Dawson.

When WA issued the law it included people that were already in gaol but not ready for parole.

This seems to be the same.

From your article.
"The new laws will apply to all current and future offenders including convicted offenders not yet considered for parole."

I think I heard there were currently 6 prisoners in NSW that this could apply to.

 

[JLZ]

Paul Dawson must answer this question
Does he know Paul Cooper?

The venue where you saw Lyn, is it in the Port Macquarie region? Is that why you're sure Lyn wasn't also at home that night?

 

[Witness 28]

The venue where you saw Lyn, is it in the Port Macquarie region? Is that why you're sure Lyn wasn't also at home that night?

No.. not Port Macquarie..... it's mentioned in the teachers.pet ...staircase going up stairs surrounded by glass

 

[SLouTh]

No.. not Port Macquarie..... it's mentioned in the teachers.pet ...staircase going up stairs surrounded by glass

Newtown RSL Club???

 

[JLZ]

No.. not Port Macquarie..... it's mentioned in the teachers.pet ...staircase going up stairs surrounded by glass

I don't know Sydney at all. Is the venue far from the Dawson home?

 

[Bats]

Paul Dawson must answer this question
Does he know Paul Cooper?

I could be wrong but i'd be confident that the prosecution would have been all over this at the trial. Why would the defence bring in a witness (their only witness) that is potentially going to dig a deeper hole for themselves?
Why/how do you think there's a connection here W28?

 

[Witness 28]

I could be wrong but i'd be confident that the prosecution would have been all over this at the trial. Why would the defence bring in a witness (their only witness) that is potentially going to dig a deeper hole for themselves?
Why/how do you think there's a connection here W28?

Newtown RSL Club???

Leagues Club

 

[Witness 28]

I could be wrong but i'd be confident that the prosecution would have been all over this at the trial. Why would the defence bring in a witness (their only witness) that is potentially going to dig a deeper hole for themselves?
Why/how do you think there's a connection here W28?

<modsnip> every sighting every lies has come from the Dawson side from Dawson's relatives sightings that never was phone calls that never were