No it wouldn't hide anything. The history of items claimed goes against the patient's Medicare number. Who gets the payment is a different question. Just routinely, if the patient has paid in full up front, then the patient would get the payment; otherwise the payment would go to the doctor. That makes no difference to the item being recorded against the patient. It needs to be that way, because there are rules such as, for a given patient, Medicare will pay no more than 4 of these specific services in a 12-month period. (There are lots of rules where the history affects the payment.)A deed poll may also be used to register a Billing Agent. A Billing Agent acts on the patient’s behalf to claim Medicare and private health insurance medical benefits.
How Does a Deed Poll Work? - Lawpath
How does this work? Would it hide any visits to dentists/doctors under the persons name.
Also, changing one's name shouldn't make a difference either: the history is connected to the Medicare number irrespective of the name. However I don't know whether police would have been legally permitted/would have had the competence to know to search by Medicare number. I can't completely exclude a case of fraud slipping through and enabling someone to get a new Medicare identity, but the system is designed to prevent it.
I know this because I worked with a subset of the database.