- Joined
- Apr 16, 2018
- Messages
- 816
- Reaction score
- 7,550
I'm listening to the new TLV Catch-Up Episodes which recap the entire case. It's like being a TV detective when they go to the white board and go back to the beginning. So many pieces pop up in a clearer way. Like this:
If it wasn't MB who returned to Australia, why would an imposter say the return was only for 3 days? Why would the imposter give details about life in Luxembourg and being married? These are very specific things which call attention to themselves. I assume MB's passport in the new Florabella name also flagged Marion. (Link between the two identities.) If an imposter wanted to keep a low profile, it would have made sense to say that the trip was a RETURN to Australia, not a jaunt of just 3 days which would be on record if MB didn't leave Australia in 3 days. It also would have made sense to be vague in personal details which would not draw attention to anything. Like naming an Australian residence and calling herself a "Teacher."
For this reason I'm 100% sure it was MB who returned.
If it wasn't MB who returned to Australia, why would an imposter say the return was only for 3 days? Why would the imposter give details about life in Luxembourg and being married? These are very specific things which call attention to themselves. I assume MB's passport in the new Florabella name also flagged Marion. (Link between the two identities.) If an imposter wanted to keep a low profile, it would have made sense to say that the trip was a RETURN to Australia, not a jaunt of just 3 days which would be on record if MB didn't leave Australia in 3 days. It also would have made sense to be vague in personal details which would not draw attention to anything. Like naming an Australian residence and calling herself a "Teacher."
For this reason I'm 100% sure it was MB who returned.