Found Deceased Australia - Melissa Caddick, 49, Sydney, NSW, 12 Nov 2020 #6

[Redrunner]

The parents didn’t only invest money, the main issue is that they gave her daughter the proceeds of the Lugano property to put down on the Edgecliffe mortgage , yet they were tenants of the property.

100% correct.

 

[Trooper]

Yes she did and he was un aware.

maybe it wasn't for the Edgecliff property, but it was for something!!..

No one was safe.. not her own dad, or her father in law. No one. How she must have hated them all, yet they never got a glimpse of that enmity. And to maintain the friendships, how the hell did she do that, knowing what she'd done to them?...

 

[Trooper]

100% correct.

It' s highly unlikely they would have given her the money from the Lugano home, unless they were convinced it was going into their ownership of the Edgecliff place. They wouldn't have done it to be tenants..

They were fully involved players in the Sydney Real Estate game, and that doesn't have a place for tenants... they would have rather poked their own eyes out than find out they were not owners, but , and it's a bit but, hardly even tenants, merely inhabiting a place at the whim and will of their daughter which would end instantly upon her death.

 

[Trooper]

Dont forget diamonds are a girls best friend. How easy is it to move them around, .. a little too easy I think.

the trouble with your Hong Kong gold and diamonds is when it comes to actually going into Honkers to get it all, and then getting out of Honkers with it intact in your little bags. .. ...

There is many a slip between cup and lip in that process.

 

[BlueViolet]

I think the father in law was mighty suspicious, but even he could not have imagined the scale of the scam. And what could he have said? Nothing that would take away the Audi from Anthony.. Anthony would never have been in any mood to listen to any of that kind of stuff.

Even when they got the horrible early morning banging on the door.. 'ello, ello, ello it's the AFP , folks' , Anthony was still telling friends ( 'investors' ) ' everything's all right, it's all in trust..'... None so blind as those that will not see.

It was in trust, her trust

 

[BlueViolet]

maybe it wasn't for the Edgecliff property, but it was for something!!..

No one was safe.. not her own dad, or her father in law. No one. How she must have hated them all, yet they never got a glimpse of that enmity. And to maintain the friendships, how the hell did she do that, knowing what she'd done to them?...

And spending xmas lunch with them too. Michelle, the personal trainer, said on 60 minutes that she was going to meet MC that day to discuss xmas lunch for 18.

 

[BlueViolet]

A majority of people hate who they have to have xmas lunch with and MC would have had to put on her I’m a good girl persona

 

[minime9]

I think if you go back to the last 60 Minutes eps, the reporter asks Roddo's signature, he said he didnt sign it I think from memory he didnt have his power of attorney details, so minime9 that is correct.

Sorry I’m typing from my phone so it auto corrects a lot into unintentional words.

I meant to say that that the JP statement & signature is fake. No stamp and even the wording & structure isn’t correct. RK’s signature was forged.

 

[JLZ]

maybe it wasn't for the Edgecliff property, but it was for something!!..

No one was safe.. not her own dad, or her father in law. No one. How she must have hated them all, yet they never got a glimpse of that enmity. And to maintain the friendships, how the hell did she do that, knowing what she'd done to them?...

BBM. I'm guessing her parents had glimpses (were subjected to tantrums) but she spun it that it was only because she cared about them. And she was concerned about all the terrible things that would probably happen to them if they didn't follow her instructions exactly.

 

[stormbird]

Red R can you please tell me where you read that Melissa's Safety Boxes (plural) had been seized please? The ASIC Affidavit mentions one safety box being seized.....

The affidavit does mention "safety boxes" but only the NAB one being seized...

I am most interested in the Safety Deposit Boxes.....hence my question.... as I also thought MC may have had one with a Private Firm that allowed 24 hour access...

Many thanks

SLouTh, what might be interesting about the safety deposit box(es)? I remember you mentioning them in past threads, but I don't understand how they might be significant.

 

[BlueViolet]

BBM. I'm guessing her parents had glimpses (were subjected to tantrums) but she spun it that it was only because she cared about them. And she was concerned about all the terrible things that would probably happen to them if they didn't follow her instructions exactly.

And, of course, to live closer to their grandson

 

[Trooper]

Why not? They didn’t have the full purchase amount upfront & knew she had to mortgage it. Considering she was paying the mortgage repayments it’s not far fetched that they all would have agreed on this approach so MC could claim back through negative gearing.

Also the parents were never going to be able to get the mortgage themselves & are in their 80s now. They possibly knew they’d be dead before the mortgage was paid off.... imo

They were not even tenants.. they merely resided there, under the false impression that their daughter had equity in it, thus decreeing residential rights to them. In this, they were sadly mislead, as will be made pretty clear once the Receiver stuff gets underway.. I am really surprised that they have been able to cling on for so long there ... so proving the point that possession is 9/10ths of the law. Because if they could , the investors would have had them out last year, with a days notice, to boot.

Their 'contribution' to the property, given to Melissa, is neither here nor there, as the records show. .. They may have thought, and no doubt were told, that it was going to make them part owners of Edgecliff,,, but that makes no difference at all, when it comes to contract law, and property law..

It was a very horrible thing to do to them. It was deliberate, no doubt about that at all.

 

[Redrunner]

Sorry I’m typing from my phone so it auto corrects a lot into unintentional words.

I meant to say that that the JP statement & signature is fake. No stamp and even the wording & structure isn’t correct. RK’s signature was forged.

Ok, yes. 100% correct. Typing on a phone, auto correct!!! what auto correct I need an AI phone?

 

[Redrunner]

the trouble with your Hong Kong gold and diamonds is when it comes to actually going into Honkers to get it all, and then getting out of Honkers with it intact in your little bags. .. ...

There is many a slip between cup and lip in that process.

Now if I was Dolly Parton endowed, which would look interesting to say the least, I would secrete a few choose stones under my ...
No in all honesty, how hard would it be to exit a country with stones, me thinks I'm just too creative for my own good. Who said anything about bags, amateurs Trooper, amateurs!!!

 

[SLouTh]

SLouTh, what might be interesting about the safety deposit box(es)? I remember you mentioning them in past threads, but I don't understand how they might be significant.

Hi Stormy,
I have wondered if MC had a stash of money / valuables / 2nd identity etc in a Safety Deposit Box somewhere in Sydney, if she knew ASIC were investigating her and had a "Back Up Plan" in place.....
IMO she did seem to know ASIC were coming.... she deleted SM and shredded documents etc...

There is still a lot of money unaccounted for ..... that could be in a private box somewhere??? MC made some large withdrawals / transactions before the raid....

It would make sense to put that type of thing into a privately secured facility that has 24hour access.... where customer "discretion" is high on the agenda .... IMO

 

[Redrunner]

SLouTh, what might be interesting about the safety deposit box(es)? I remember you mentioning them in past threads, but I don't understand how they might be significant.

Really, is it that hard to follow the dots..... someone help me out pls, any takers?

 

[HelloJohnny]

I can only imagine their levels of distress, after working to own their own home and being comfortable in retirement, to now potentially being homeless and also having no money, after trusting their daughter to make huge decisions about their future.

Absolutely. Can you imagine the torment, heartache and conflict that the are experiencing:

• Their daughter (who I’m sure they love) is missing and the officials are indicating there is evidence of unethical transactions.
  
• At first I’m sure they didn’t believe she was capable of such transgressions.
• Their home is not what it appeared to be.
• Their daughter’s ethical behaviour is bein
  

  A very plausible scenario I think HJ...... also possible (speculation only) that MC told her parents that the dividends from their investments were paying for the mortgage.....
  
  The only problem I see with this is that the Investors that were long time family friends will likely be more upset / possibly feel more deceived if MC's family push for ownership of the apartment, and ultimately end up with a higher return than the Investors...... JMO

  
  Agree 100%

 

[SLouTh]

They were not even tenants.. they merely resided there, under the false impression that their daughter had equity in it, thus decreeing residential rights to them. In this, they were sadly mislead, as will be made pretty clear once the Receiver stuff gets underway.. I am really surprised that they have been able to cling on for so long there ... so proving the point that possession is 9/10ths of the law. Because if they could , the investors would have had them out last year, with a days notice, to boot.

Their 'contribution' to the property, given to Melissa, is neither here nor there, as the records show. .. They may have thought, and no doubt were told, that it was going to make them part owners of Edgecliff,,, but that makes no difference at all, when it comes to contract law, and property law..

It was a very horrible thing to do to them. It was deliberate, no doubt about that at all.

Agree Troops ...
I have also wondered if MC was her parents EPOA???? And if that is why AG was made MC's EPOA in 2016....???? As a back up if something happened to MC???

As it could have been around 2016 when they were thinking of / or put the Family Home on the Market (it sold in 2017) and when MC took control of their finances??

Just a thought....

 

[JLZ]

Agree Troops ...
I have also wondered if MC was her parents EPOA???? And if that is why AG was made MC's EPOA in 2016....???? As a back up if something happened to MC???

As it could have been around 2016 when they were thinking of / or put the Family Home on the Market (it sold in 2017) and when MC took control of their finances??

Just a thought....

I don't think the powers are transitive like that. Besides it would have been simpler for the parents to do what Melissa did . . . name two attorneys and specify in what circumstances each is to have the power. They could make it clear that AG is the backup where Melissa's not available.

 

[SLouTh]

Can you imagine the torment, heartache and conflict that the are experiencing:

• Their daughter (who I’m sure they love) is missing and the officials are indicating there is evidence of unethical transactions.
  
• At first I’m sure they didn’t believe she was capable of such transgressions.
• Their home is not what it appeared to be.

Unimaginable pain...... I don't think many elderly people would cope with such..... or any of us for that matter....