HelloJohnny
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2021
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 385
Hi, I’m new to the forum, but have been lurking for a while.
I find myself wondering if the shoe has antimicrobial properties, which has inhibited biological growth. Thus, providing a suggestion as to why there was no algae or organic growth.
I guess, my thoughts have been formed, as a result of knowing that some manufacturers of exercise gear these days, do claim to have these antimicrobial properties to discourage odour (not suggesting that the shoe and remains didn’t stink) fungus, bacteria etc.
Just trying to think outside the box.
Furthermore, when searching online for an example of the shoe (similar to that found on the beach). I came across a pair that was remarkably similar. I would regard the price point as being at the high-end of the ASICS brand running shoes.
ASICS Women's GEL-Nimbus 22 Platinum
IMOO the model of shoes could be a match.
My aim was to try and track down the model, and check out the Ascis website to see the properties of the shoe.
Photo of Melissa’s shoe (photo source Daily Telegraph)
In terms of what has already been reported in the news...
The 7News article claimed that Melissa was seen during the raid wearing a ‘...distinctive ASICS brand sneaker that can only be purchased in Israel...’. Albeit, that the 9Now news article, was somewhat contradictory to the 7News article when stating that ‘the shoe - which was ordered online from Israel...’.
Maybe MC did procure that particular model online from Israel. However, IMOO they could have been easily sourced from an Australian market place (like Catch and a variety of others) and then shipped direct from an overseas supplier to the Australian address.
(I’m an Avid online shopper, and this happens often and I have procured items this way that have been released in a overseas market, but not in Australia).
Moreover, I think that some manufacturers/suppliers sometimes get rid of old, discontinued, or superseded stock through these online Marketplaces too. I noted the ‘Nimbus 22‘ models (different colour but same model described in my hypothesis, as stated above) are now discontinued on the Ascis website and have been upgraded with ‘Nimbus 23’. I surmise that not all colour options are available in every country.
My theory:
Do I really think that the shoe hasn’t grown the expected amount of algae, due to the antimicrobial properties? No, I’m just trying to consider other options and think outside the box. It actually makes me feel sick, when I consider what I actually think happened to her.
So maybe it’s kinder to think that she took her own life and the only remains of her left, were washed to shore in a shoe, and now the family has a remanent of closure. But unfortunately this is not what I think - but explains my though process and why I felt the need to disprove an alternative theory.
My hunch is that; 1) MC purposely evaded cameras (by sneaking out of the home unbeknown to AK or son), 2) left her mobile phone at home on purpose (to evade tower pings), 3) left her home of her own free will (either to hideout, or meet up with someone), and then 4) Months later met with foul play.
Strictly my own opinion, but unfortunately, my gut feeling is that she has met with foul play, the foot/shoe was a plant (to be found), and her now deceased body been disposed of somewhere far away, never to be found again. Just enough evidence to trigger (the possibility of) a ruling by a Coroner declaring that she may (or is likely) be dead.
I wonder if an unsavoury character (maybe an associate of hers that she trusted) has taken ‘an opportunity’, to take advantage of the situation (splashed around in the media) by deceiving her (to get her away from the house), then attempting to extort the missing millions - to no avail. IMOO they have (wrongly) assumed that MC could access the funds. Then have proceeded to disposed of her, when she didn’t (or couldn’t) come up with the goods. IMOO the longer she was kept alive the greater the liability she would have become.
Assumed Personality type:
IMOO I believe the other sleuths are on the money, when they circumspectly assumed that with ‘her’ personality type, she is unlikely to take her own life.
IMOO I don’t think that with ‘her’ assumed personality type, that she would ever give up ‘the goods’ to an extortionist. I would think that she would place a high value on ‘her’ money, that she worked very hard for (even though she acquired it by committing fraudulent activities and by deception). I can only imagine how much effort that it takes to continually maintaining the ruse. Especially with so many fraudulent elements in play. In my very strong opinion, there’d be no way in hell she’d give up the money freely. In her opinion, I bet she considered the money to be hers.
Overall, I feel very sorry for her loved ones. It’s a terrible situation that they are in. I’m sure they still love her, and I imagine would feel very conflicted - especially due to the high degree of deception and lies. Very sad.
It blows my mind that there are so many controls in place to ensure a high degree of compliance and to mitigate fraudulent activities. But if people are intent on cheating the system they will.
I find myself wondering if the shoe has antimicrobial properties, which has inhibited biological growth. Thus, providing a suggestion as to why there was no algae or organic growth.
I guess, my thoughts have been formed, as a result of knowing that some manufacturers of exercise gear these days, do claim to have these antimicrobial properties to discourage odour (not suggesting that the shoe and remains didn’t stink) fungus, bacteria etc.
Just trying to think outside the box.
Furthermore, when searching online for an example of the shoe (similar to that found on the beach). I came across a pair that was remarkably similar. I would regard the price point as being at the high-end of the ASICS brand running shoes.
ASICS Women's GEL-Nimbus 22 Platinum
IMOO the model of shoes could be a match.
My aim was to try and track down the model, and check out the Ascis website to see the properties of the shoe.
Photo of Melissa’s shoe (photo source Daily Telegraph)
In terms of what has already been reported in the news...
The 7News article claimed that Melissa was seen during the raid wearing a ‘...distinctive ASICS brand sneaker that can only be purchased in Israel...’. Albeit, that the 9Now news article, was somewhat contradictory to the 7News article when stating that ‘the shoe - which was ordered online from Israel...’.
Maybe MC did procure that particular model online from Israel. However, IMOO they could have been easily sourced from an Australian market place (like Catch and a variety of others) and then shipped direct from an overseas supplier to the Australian address.
(I’m an Avid online shopper, and this happens often and I have procured items this way that have been released in a overseas market, but not in Australia).
Moreover, I think that some manufacturers/suppliers sometimes get rid of old, discontinued, or superseded stock through these online Marketplaces too. I noted the ‘Nimbus 22‘ models (different colour but same model described in my hypothesis, as stated above) are now discontinued on the Ascis website and have been upgraded with ‘Nimbus 23’. I surmise that not all colour options are available in every country.
My theory:
Do I really think that the shoe hasn’t grown the expected amount of algae, due to the antimicrobial properties? No, I’m just trying to consider other options and think outside the box. It actually makes me feel sick, when I consider what I actually think happened to her.
So maybe it’s kinder to think that she took her own life and the only remains of her left, were washed to shore in a shoe, and now the family has a remanent of closure. But unfortunately this is not what I think - but explains my though process and why I felt the need to disprove an alternative theory.
My hunch is that; 1) MC purposely evaded cameras (by sneaking out of the home unbeknown to AK or son), 2) left her mobile phone at home on purpose (to evade tower pings), 3) left her home of her own free will (either to hideout, or meet up with someone), and then 4) Months later met with foul play.
Strictly my own opinion, but unfortunately, my gut feeling is that she has met with foul play, the foot/shoe was a plant (to be found), and her now deceased body been disposed of somewhere far away, never to be found again. Just enough evidence to trigger (the possibility of) a ruling by a Coroner declaring that she may (or is likely) be dead.
I wonder if an unsavoury character (maybe an associate of hers that she trusted) has taken ‘an opportunity’, to take advantage of the situation (splashed around in the media) by deceiving her (to get her away from the house), then attempting to extort the missing millions - to no avail. IMOO they have (wrongly) assumed that MC could access the funds. Then have proceeded to disposed of her, when she didn’t (or couldn’t) come up with the goods. IMOO the longer she was kept alive the greater the liability she would have become.
Assumed Personality type:
IMOO I believe the other sleuths are on the money, when they circumspectly assumed that with ‘her’ personality type, she is unlikely to take her own life.
IMOO I don’t think that with ‘her’ assumed personality type, that she would ever give up ‘the goods’ to an extortionist. I would think that she would place a high value on ‘her’ money, that she worked very hard for (even though she acquired it by committing fraudulent activities and by deception). I can only imagine how much effort that it takes to continually maintaining the ruse. Especially with so many fraudulent elements in play. In my very strong opinion, there’d be no way in hell she’d give up the money freely. In her opinion, I bet she considered the money to be hers.
Overall, I feel very sorry for her loved ones. It’s a terrible situation that they are in. I’m sure they still love her, and I imagine would feel very conflicted - especially due to the high degree of deception and lies. Very sad.
It blows my mind that there are so many controls in place to ensure a high degree of compliance and to mitigate fraudulent activities. But if people are intent on cheating the system they will.