To find a female abductor paired with a male abductor where there is no romantic connection would be the rarest of rare possibilities in this case, with probabilities lower than 0.001%.
The most probable and simple solution is that this wild speculation is not true.
@Trmtrm2 said:
its hard to imagine why a woman would want to be involved in the grooming of a missing child,
@Officer Dibble replied:
Women do abduct/steal children and babies. JMO
I quoted a post, which quoted a post. I pointed out that Women can in fact be involved in events that I mentioned. Look it up!
If there was a Woman involved, how do you know that they weren't romantically involved? Blood also runs thicker than water, so who is to say it wasn't a close relative? Again,
If there was a Woman involved.
If you read my first paragraph, I said I wasn't suggesting it was the case, but, in a highly unusual case, nothing would surprise me.
Where did you obtain your 0.001% stat from? Link please.
What are the probabilities of a child being abducted from a tent in the middle of the night with her Parents close by, particularly in Australia? Fairly low I would imagine. Lower than 0.001%? IDK, you may be able to find those stats too.
What are the probabilities of this abducted child being found alive 18 days later? You have an abducted child, from a tent with Parents nearby, then found alive 18 days later!
Are the probabilities of that happening less or greater than 0.001%. Again, IDK, I dont have the stats, nor am I prepared to pick a number.
I do know that this whole case is highly unusual.
Just to finish off, this case is full of the
rarest of rare possibilities. More than a few people thought that with the initial disappearance of C, that
"the most probable and simple solution" is that the Parents were involved. That wild speculation was not true either!
