At school we were told that an individual's DNA is unique in the history of humanity, except in the case of identical twins. Law enforcement doesn't compare DNA at that level of detail. A profile isn't the whole story, but is considered forensically very adequate.Thanks, somehow I had missed that part ….. as that is what I was expecting to come out at the trial …… why wasn’t the prosecution shouting this from the rooftops??? Especially in summing up???
Is a DNA “profile” match the same as ,an exact DNA match???
From your article above…
A sample taken from Ms Cordingley's right fingernails matched the profile of Mr Singh, the court heard.
Snip
The tests looked at 27 genetic markers and compared the DNA profiles from the samples to those of Mr Singh and Ms Cordingley's boyfriend Mr Heidenreich.
I thought this was interesting & informative, notwithstanding the NSW orientation: DNA - Analysis and Probability Have a look under the heading 'R v Milat'.