I can't tell if he's pretending to be a psychopath or sound like a psychopath or genuinely is one. :dunno: Maybe a bit of both?
IMO - It's genuine
I can't tell if he's pretending to be a psychopath or sound like a psychopath or genuinely is one. :dunno: Maybe a bit of both?
IMO - It's genuine
Not necessarily, there is overzealous prosecution and overcharging of defendants. There are plenty of cases, where Joe Public scratches his head as to why they even got to trial, this is one of them. There is virtually no chance of GT being found guilty of murder, exemplified by the recent acquittal of a defendant in a vaguely similar trial.
If it's pointless, why is this "disengaged" myth being repeated as a fact over and over?
Just guessing. Because it is fact?
And I have a question, she stated she wanted to leave and then was locked away and prevented from leaving...is there not some charge that should be filed over that? Wrongful imprisonment?
And I have a question, she stated she wanted to leave and then was locked away and prevented from leaving...is there not some charge that should be filed over that? Wrongful imprisonment?
Just guessing. Because it is fact?
Deprivation of Liberty is what I'm thinking, and also Stealing, since he meant to keep the contents of her purse whatever happened.
How so? You just agreed no one could possibly know. For all we know he was doing the hokey pokey naked. We don't know.
I liken this case to having a gun pointed at me and running in the only direction possible to save my life, even if the exit is a motorway.
Guessing and facts don't belong together.
No, pl,ease don't verbal me. The instant she was on the balcony, him inside, door locked.....disengaged. If he wanted to do any more than that, he would have done it. He didn't. He neutralised her, and prevented any further reasonably foreseeable nasty outcomes. She then made all the decisions, not him. Simple as that.
Yes, that's the crux of it South. People lacking empathy cannot imagine being in another person's position; cannot imagine the terror she was experiencing. To them, Gabe Tostee, nice guy, was on the other side of the door so she was safe. To Warriena, the psycho was only a glass door away.
That's the one thing I fear, a lack of empathy by the jury.
No, pl,ease don't verbal me. The instant she was on the balcony, him inside, door locked.....disengaged. If he wanted to do any more than that, he would have done it. He didn't. He neutralised her, and prevented any further reasonably foreseeable nasty outcomes. She then made all the decisions, not him. Simple as that.
No, pl,ease don't verbal me. The instant she was on the balcony, him inside, door locked.....disengaged. If he wanted to do any more than that, he would have done it. He didn't. He neutralised her, and prevented any further reasonably foreseeable nasty outcomes. She then made all the decisions, not him. Simple as that.