She is ridiculous and disgusting for saying and thinking these things about a child who was a victim of her husband.
But even leaving that aside I wonder if it's really just to ease her own cognitive dissonance, in a way, to put all the blame on the victim. Much easier to continue a relationship with a sex offender if you just make your brain believe that it's not his fault and he was 'seduced'. :sick: (personally I've always hated hearing that used as any kind of excuse, even in situations where the people involved are consenting adults ... 'i couldn't help it, she seduced me', pffffft. Weak.)
Reading the article, is she saying that the victim, who was 9 at the time, is now at 14 having some issues with sexual relationships? Because if so, I wonder why? Could be the response to the trauma of having been raped as a child?