Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #26

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #281
what a crew of sickos and depraved souls. Talk about time to drain the swamp..that william should have come in contact with any of these people makes my skin crawl....
 
  • #282
  • #283
  • #284


Thank you so much for watching out for these trial dates, soso. :tyou:

This has all been dragging on for so long. I am really glad that these women are now getting their day(s) in court.
Only a few weeks away!

Then on to Victoria.


Court documents show Victorian police had charged Spedding with multiple child sexual abuse offences, including various counts of indecent assault and sexual intercourse with children between 1983 and 1985.
http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/4240094/alleged-paedophile-spedding-to-face-court-next-year/
 
  • #285
I still follow Williams case and always will although I don't feel there is much I can offer anymore, i'm just broken over this one. I can not believe he still hasn't been found, who ever knows and refuses to come forward has no soul as far i'm concerned, if they did this would have been over a long time ago.
Much love to those of you that have stayed and kept Williams thread alive...
 
  • #286
My thoughts are what are the chances a person with connections to the biological family of a foster child who was supposed to be at the house where this child was visiting not having anything to do with his abduction.
Pigs arse

I heard someone call 'Pigs arse'? :seeya:


“The probability of a certain set of circumstances coming together in a meaningful (or tragic) way is so low that it simply cannot be considered mere coincidence. ”
~ V.C. King
 
  • #287
Or maybe a person's 'significant other' knows what likely happened to William .. or can establish that an alibi is false?

That 'significant other' is still standing by that scum?
'But I love him'. Arghhhhh
 
  • #288
A websleuths member has a scrren shot of a facebook connection between the families that disappeared soon after . Crime stoppers have been informed.

Can it be posted on here? Or is that against the rules?

Unfortunately it can't be posted as it is from FB.
It is NOT a coincidence when a FB screenshot shows MS's grandson friends with WT's bio mum!!
Six degrees of separation? Nah that's too close for comfort. I sat on the fence until I saw that. IMHO.

It gives me a glimmer of hope he's still alive....a glimmer.
 
  • #289
  • #290
  • #291
  • #292
Maybe he's got something on her too, TGY? Or at least on her family. Perhaps a 'significant other' could be complicit? Just IMO.

That 'significant other' is still standing by that scum?
'But I love him'. Arghhhhh
 
  • #293
Unfortunately it can't be posted as it is from FB.
It is NOT a coincidence when a FB screenshot shows MS's grandson friends with WT's bio mum!!
Six degrees of separation? Nah that's too close for comfort. I sat on the fence until I saw that. IMHO.

It gives me a glimmer of hope he's still alive....a glimmer.

Same, but if that is why he was abducted where is he?
It's a sure thing that from day one, the bio family would have been in the sights of NSW Police, front and centre, and they would have been investigated through and through.

It makes perfect sense and yet at the same time, makes none.
 
  • #294
Is BS in court today ?
 
  • #295
  • #296

Attachments

  • IMG_1553.jpg
    IMG_1553.jpg
    46 KB · Views: 34
  • #297
Return of subpoena tomorrow.
They don't have to front up for that do they?

https://onlineregistry.lawlink.nsw....20150011963915742518ReturnofSubpoena/spedding

Sounds as though his lawyer (or lawyers rep) will want to be there, but he won't be required to attend


For example, the subpoena will state that documents and things (including a copy of the subpoena) are to be produced on 30 April 2014 at 9.00 am in the Supreme Court of NSW, Level 4, Law Courts Building, Queens Square, 184 Phillip Street, Sydney.

The date on the subpoena is also known as the date for the return of subpoena. More importantly, the subpoena will state the access orders proposed by the issuing party. For example, the issuing party may seek general access to the subpoenaed documents.

If you are required to attend the return of subpoena:

You may seek orders for access to the documents produced under the subpoena.
You may seek orders objecting to a party accessing the documents produced under the subpoena.
If documents have not been produced or the party needs more time to produce, you may seek for the subpoena to be stood over to another return date.
You may seek any other orders relating to the subpoena.

The parties may not be allowed to access any subpoena documents until the Court has made access orders.

https://www.unifiedlawyers.com.au/return-of-subpoena/
 
  • #298
That 'significant other' is still standing by that scum?
'But I love him'. Arghhhhh

But how could they, lie in the same bed with a man that's capable of doing such unspeakable things to children ?!?!?
And I'm sorry if you think I'm jumping the gun on BS but where there's smoke there's definitely fire.....
PS I've not posted in a while, I still read all your excellent comments [emoji170][emoji1037] and I'll always follow little William case until we get justice for our little lad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #299
I have been going over all my older posts and messages trying to find a particular message with some interesting info which I'm not sure was posted or discussed. MS cousin is listed as a cousin of a resident on Benaroon Drive. I find that either a huge coincidence or a little bit to close to home .
 
  • #300
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
2,315
Total visitors
2,403

Forum statistics

Threads
632,807
Messages
18,631,964
Members
243,299
Latest member
2Phaze
Back
Top