Bohemian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Messages
- 10,370
- Reaction score
- 16,631
Whàngarei;13900079 said:If tj has just left gaol and is on parole, does that mean he cant leave the state of NSW.
I would imagine so although IANAL.
Whàngarei;13900079 said:If tj has just left gaol and is on parole, does that mean he cant leave the state of NSW.
She’s no longer a PYT who may have made a silly mistake. She’s in her 30s and has a long rap sheet. The only thing that may save her from jail are her children, if they’re still in her care. If she doesn’t get a custodial sentence, I still don’t know if she’ll be walking out of the courtroom — if she does — with a smile on her face. Comes a time everyone has to pay the piper.
She may have put herself in real danger of losing these two children. If she gets a custodial sentence, and they are put into foster care and not kincare ......
Is there a world drought on contraceptives?
Does the govt. still give $5,000 for having a baby. WTF.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Is there a world drought on contraceptives?
Does the govt. still give $5,000 for having a baby. WTF.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Baby bonus ended in March 2014. Started in 2002.
In 2014, it changed to Newborn Supplement and Family Tax Benefit A .... $540 upfront payment, then ongoing additional Centrelink payments.
http://mccrindle.com.au/the-mccrindle-blog/the-baby-bonus-generation
https://www.humanservices.gov.au/in...ewborn-upfront-payment-and-newborn-supplement
In Karlie’s case, I think it might’ve be a little more complicated than wanting cash for a big screen TV. God, I hope someone can help her turn her life around. The right kind of help.
Section 10's will be abolished under new penalties set to come into effect in NSW in 2018 ( not sure when thou ) with a push to ICO ( Intensive Corrections Order ) .
Lots of info in this link, I'd be surprised if Karlie gets a custodial sentence.....
https://www.criminaldefencelawyers.com.au/blog/new-penalties-to-be-introduced-in-nsw/
Section 10's will be abolished under new penalties set to come into effect in NSW in 2018 ( not sure when thou ) with a push to ICO ( Intensive Corrections Order ) .
Lots of info in this link, I'd be surprised if Karlie gets a custodial sentence.....
https://www.criminaldefencelawyers.com.au/blog/new-penalties-to-be-introduced-in-nsw/
In March 2014, six months before William went missing, Ms Tyrrell was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and common assault.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/2...l-mum-sentence-for-spitting-at-police-officer
She would have been pregnant when this assault charge occurred. Wouldn't she?
Karlie has obviously been around the block a few times, and knows her way around a courtroom.
Firstly, in the case of common assault:
"By pleading guilty at an early stage, you will be spared the time and expense of a defended hearing. You may also receive a more favourable outcome, as you will demonstrate to the court that you are accepting responsibility for your actions by pleading guilty.
You may even avoid a criminal conviction altogether by persuading the magistrate to make a Section 10 order - which means guiilty but no criminal conviction is recorded against you."
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/criminal/offences/assault/common-assault/
An intervention or good behaviour bond is often the result of a Section 10 order.
Also, from what I can see among the many NSW sites I have looked at, "duress" is the only defence/reason available to her for her actions. She does not meet the requirements for any other defence/reason.
Hence, her handwritten note about panic attacks? Could that have helped her to attain the pre-sentencing review, that may result in a Section 10 order?
.
I only just worked out what IANAL means. I feel a bit silly now.I would imagine so although IANAL.
A bit more info - it is the DM though.
When the officers arrived Tyrrell launched into a sweary tirade, saying 'yous(e) are c***s', police alleged. The tirade continued even after they asked her to stop because children were present.
'The accused became very angry when (the) Constable ... asked the (boy) what the marks on his legs were.
'The accused has grabbed (the child's) leg and stated 'none of your f***ing business,' police alleged.
The facts said when the officer began to speak to Tyrrell she said 'f*** off ranga c***', police alleged.
At this time the accused has began to draw saliva into her mouth by making a throat clearing noise. 'She has then recoiled her head back and projected her lips forward, launching saliva from her mouth towards (the constable).'
The hocked up spit landed on the police officer's right eyebrow and cheek.
Tyrrell spat on the officer again before police restrained her on the ground and handcuffed her.
A bit more info - it is the DM though.
When the officers arrived Tyrrell launched into a sweary tirade, saying 'yous(e) are c***s', police alleged. The tirade continued even after they asked her to stop because children were present.
'The accused became very angry when (the) Constable ... asked the (boy) what the marks on his legs were.
'The accused has grabbed (the child's) leg and stated 'none of your f***ing business,' police alleged.
The facts said when the officer began to speak to Tyrrell she said 'f*** off ranga c***', police alleged.
At this time the accused has began to draw saliva into her mouth by making a throat clearing noise. 'She has then recoiled her head back and projected her lips forward, launching saliva from her mouth towards (the constable).'
The hocked up spit landed on the police officer's right eyebrow and cheek.
Tyrrell spat on the officer again before police restrained her on the ground and handcuffed her.
At this time the accused has began to draw saliva into her mouth by making a throat clearing noise. 'She has then recoiled her head back and projected her lips forward, launching saliva from her mouth towards (the constable).'
The hocked up spit landed on the police officer's right eyebrow and cheek.
Tyrrell spat on the officer again before police restrained her on the ground and handcuffed her.
Makes me feel sick. Poor little boys . Maybe they are used to that behaviour . So the cycle begins.
Can you imagine the distress they would have felt at seeing their mother slammed to the ground and handcuffed?
Then what happened to the boys, as their mother was led away? Was someone else there to care for them and comfort them?
Were they brought to the police station and cared for by a 'c*nt' police officer or welfare advocate?
And then to take them to court (unless she was meeting their carer there). That risked running into the media, which they did. What was she thinking? Something is wrong here, that much is obvious.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.