Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #33

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #541
Yes and it doesnt indicate that the argument is regarding defamation.

No it doesn't. Do you have any idea's?
Because I am scratching my head to consider all possibilities.
 
  • #542
No it doesn't. Do you have any idea's?
Because I am scratching my head to consider all possibilities.

Perhaps the girls have given interviews? Perhaps a media company visited the Speddings and did the foot-in-the-door and camera-in-the-face thing? (And so Spedding is seeking an injunction to prevent publication, rather than chasing damages after the fact.)
 
  • #543
  • #544
Perhaps the girls have given interviews? Perhaps a media company visited the Speddings and did the foot-in-the-door and camera-in-the-face thing? (And so Spedding is seeking an injunction to prevent publication, rather than chasing damages after the fact.)

It’s intriguing, isn’t it? I wonder if another MSM outlet will publicise the upcoming case?
 
  • #545
to not be caught by now the person responsible for williams disappearance may be highly intelligent, cunning, meticulous and it may have been planned with precision, maybe a sociopath, someone untouchable or with influence?
they must be very clever to elude the police for so long
 
  • #546
How about you answer why you posted a photo of a supposed male that you knew of and questioned , the photo was of a female = it makes no sense what so ever

You even said the second phoot looked like a male... so?
 
  • #547
Perhaps the girls have given interviews? Perhaps a media company visited the Speddings and did the foot-in-the-door and camera-in-the-face thing? (And so Spedding is seeking an injunction to prevent publication, rather than chasing damages after the fact.)

Now, that would be very interesting. Those girls definitely deserve to tell their story, if that's what they want to do.

So, in reading a bit about injunctions of this type, it seems it would take a judge well versed in defamation to oversee the matter.

This is because it would be the invasion of (their) privacy that a person is trying to stop.

And it is the freedom of speech that a media outlet would be wanting to defend.

I wonder if any high profile figures (clergy, for example) have tried to do this about an historical child sex case.


This means that, of all remedies, an interlocutory injunction restraining publication is arguably the most significant restriction on freedom of speech and the freedom of the media to report on matters of public interest and concern. There is therefore a strong and justifiable concern that unmeritorious claims to prevent the disclosure of allegedly ‘private’ information, in which there is a legitimate public interest, might chill freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.

https://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/12-remedies-and-costs/injunctions
 
  • #548
Happy to answer, never posted the pic. Certainly disagreed it was a man which we can see very clearly now. You said you knew this guy and had reported to crime stoppers. No wonder they didn’t respond because so called man is a female .

I didn't show any photos to crime stoppers...
 
  • #549
I contacted Crimestoppers with a suggestion about a murder case recently and a policeman got in touch with me within a couple of days. As far as I'm concerned, Crimestoppers is in good functional order.

That’s good to hear JLZ, I’m sure they get so many bogus calls and Know when to separate the wheat fron the chaff
 
  • #550
Not to go off topic or change the subject to anything more interesting .... but I just wanted to mention that it is finally raining here in SA.

After the longest, driest summer and autumn, with depleted water supplies, many grass fires, and our wildlife and farmers truly suffering. It is a happy night for us. :) :) :) :) :)
 
  • #551
On the subject of Legal Aid. Can you get it in a state in which you do not reside?
 
  • #552
Not to go off topic or change the subject to anything more interesting .... but I just wanted to mention that it is finally raining here in SA.

After the longest, driest summer and autumn, with depleted water supplies, many grass fires, and our wildlife and farmers truly suffering. It is a happy night for us. :) :) :) :) :)

I hope your state gets a good drenching SA.
 
  • #553
Not to go off topic or change the subject to anything more interesting .... but I just wanted to mention that it is finally raining here in SA.

After the longest, driest summer and autumn, with depleted water supplies, many grass fires, and our wildlife and farmers truly suffering. It is a happy night for us. :) :) :) :)

That's great SA, we're still in the 30's but expecting rain next week - hurry up and send it over please :)
 
  • #554
On the subject of Legal Aid. Can you get it in a state in which you do not reside?

The short answer is yes, apparently. If you meet the means test and other requirements.

There is a forum test (we should have one of those here :D ) and then "the grant of legal assistance is the sole responsibility of the legal aid commission in the State or Territory in which the action is to be taken."


Interstate matters

All legal aid commissions in Australia have entered into a ‘reciprocity agreement’. The agreement is used to decide which commission is responsible for making a grant of legal assistance to:

a person who lives in another State or Territory
a person in one State or Territory whose legal proceedings have been transferred to a court or tribunal in another State or Territory
a person who moves interstate but whose legal proceedings have not been transferred interstate
a person who moves interstate and whose legal proceedings are also transferred to that second State or Territory.

https://handbook.vla.vic.gov.au/han...-grant-of-legal-assistance/interstate-matters
 
  • #555
That's great SA, we're still in the 30's but expecting rain next week - hurry up and send it over please :)

Need rain desperately here too
 
  • #556
On the subject of Legal Aid. Can you get it in a state in which you do not reside?

When I am reading more about this, it also seems that it can cover all types of matters - if approved.

Civil, criminal, and family law seem to be included.

Though I think there is a ceiling for the amount they will spend. I seem to remember them balking at paying top legal expenses in one of the cases we followed. They only have a certain budget, and it seems unfair to spend it all on one or two people, when so many people need legal aid.

Plus Spedding has a cool $100,000, doesn't he? That he offered for bail surety at one point in time. One would think that would disqualify him from Legal Aid. Until it runs out.

.
 
  • #557
Not to go off topic or change the subject to anything more interesting .... but I just wanted to mention that it is finally raining here in SA.

After the longest, driest summer and autumn, with depleted water supplies, many grass fires, and our wildlife and farmers truly suffering. It is a happy night for us. :) :) :) :) :)

Great news for you guys, the wildlife and the farmers! When you’re finished with the rain, could you send it up here please, SA? We would appreciate a drop or two.
 
  • #558
Bill Spedding had the means, motive, and opportunity in this crime. That has yet to be disproved. In any capacity.

And quite honestly, I have yet to hear a theory on this thread, that delivers any resemblance of facts, that accounts for another's potential guilt in this crime. Just 'could be this, might be this, maybe is this'.

I am open to other decent theories, I am not open to remaining generically open.

There is a child abductor and potential murderer out there, roaming free. I think the police know who it is. I think I may be right on the money with this one. If not, some serious other theories that are potential and probable likelihoods could be put forward. Instead of trying to pick apart a pretty strong theory, with factual indicators, that Bill Spedding is behind this crime.

Couldn’t it be said that AJ also had means, motive and opportunity, SA?
__________

Seriously, not having a go. Genuine question.
 
  • #559
Couldn’t it be said that AJ also had means, motive and opportunity, SA?
__________

Seriously, not having a go. Genuine question.

Apsolutely yes
 
  • #560
to not be caught by now the person responsible for williams disappearance may be highly intelligent, cunning, meticulous and it may have been planned with precision, maybe a sociopath, someone untouchable or with influence?
they must be very clever to elude the police for so long

I agree Bear, you would think surely some evidence or a slip-up... .but then it was years before we got an answer / arrest in Daniel's case.

when all be information was published, we realised how long they worked to get everything they needed to nail Cowan undesputably. . And IMO, we will eventually get the answer in regards to William

I felt that Jubelin was simply trying to 'hurry' the inevitable when he very publicly warned the perpretators. IMO that the Task Force knows who's responsible, they just have to play the waiting game now to ensure that WHEN they do make that Arrest, there will be no chance that it will fall over.

I can't believe that $1 million hasn't seemed attractive to those who do know. I'm sure they could also negotiate Witness Protection / new identity / relocation ... whatever they would feel would help them. ... I wonder if the play the Lotto / Lottery ??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
1,901
Total visitors
1,987

Forum statistics

Threads
632,759
Messages
18,631,324
Members
243,282
Latest member
true-crime_fan
Back
Top