- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 33,212
- Reaction score
- 217,743
Do you mean left of screen?
Yes
Do you mean left of screen?
BBM
But you would think that would involve returning once again to the scene to achieve. I doubt you could tie a rope on and flip a car if it was still burning and would you stick around if it was anyway? I just think if that was the case there must have been some dire reason to return again and go to the trouble of flipping it over. I cant see someone going to that amount of trouble just for fun.
That's where i meant, for you. I'm not sure i wrote it right? will check
oh sorry i thought you went right of screen. i looked at google maps & saw what you saw, which i thought was there?? I haven't checked out left of screen yet (right off stoney rd).Do you mean left of screen?
it's very hard to see. do you know the area of that spot?Dont consider they are cars lined up more likely logs from logging operation.
it's very hard to see. do you know the area of that spot?
SA was it the coloured area in this, or the smaller area above it? soz, i need more coffeeI just edited my previous post, because it is the one on the left of screen that I posted pics of before, and that I also determined about a 12 min drive to - if Loggers Creek Lane is included in the drive.
Sorry for the confusion. Looked at too many sat pics, I confused myself.
I dont know if they are cars in the pic (in the left-of-screen clearing) ... but they are something big enough to create shadows on the ground. Perhaps quonset huts or tanks?
![]()
But the article also states-"The information regarding the burnt-out vehicle will be part of the coronial inquest into William’s disappearance"
Could burnt-out car help lead police to William Tyrrell?
This indicates to me the car has been investigated. I would say it is possible the car was flipped over by police whilst investigating. This could explain the rope as well. Perhaps the car was originally found in a less accessible spot and was dragged to the clearing to investigate further??
It is believed the vehicle belonged to Tony Jones, a convicted paedophile who was at one point a person of interest in the little boy’s disappearance, Nine’s A Current Affair reports.
You have to wonder how much time there was between police getting the tip off and actually investigating it. You’d think they would get to the scene ASAP . If that was the case someone had to burn and flip it pretty quickly. So confusing.But the article also states-
Police received a tip-off regarding the abandoned, rusty car hidden in the bush, however once they arrived at the scene, they discovered the vehicle had been flipped and set alight.
SA was it the coloured area in this, or the smaller area above it? soz, i need more coffee
The person who observed the unburnt car might not have reported it immediately. Perhaps it was seen some months before and only thought to be report-worthy after the sighting of the two cars in Benaroon Drive was publicized. That would be three years ago I think.You have to wonder how much time there was between police getting the tip off and actually investigating it. You’d think they would get to the scene ASAP . If that was the case someone had to burn and flip it pretty quickly. So confusing.
I was struck that ACA was definitively saying, first, the dumped car belonged to TJ, and second, that his white car which was seized and this silver car are the actual cars that were seen on Benaroon Drive. It was irritating that it didn't say how long was the gap between the sighting of the unburnt car and the return with detectives, or where the car was found, but that made all the more remarkable the lack of hedging about TJ. In my opinion, bringing in Spedding was only for the sake of appearing "balanced".
I need a transcript. Perhaps I'll try some transcribing later.Or vice versa? A fuss over Jones - who was once considered a POI - while also trying to speak with Spedding and show everyone his changed appearance. Because Spedding is the one taking the media to court for defamation.
Or vice versa? A fuss over Jones - who was once considered a POI - while also trying to speak with Spedding and show everyone his changed appearance. Because Spedding is the one taking the media to court for defamation.
The car may not even carry the VIN number of Jones' old car, for all we know. Could just be a big push by ACA for ratings on the anniversary of William's disappearance, when everyone was reporting on the police announcement.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.