Jennifer17
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,552
- Reaction score
- 50,624
Is that the one who was found in cotton sleeping bag thingo?I was just going to edit, no, he's definitely dead.
Is that the one who was found in cotton sleeping bag thingo?I was just going to edit, no, he's definitely dead.
I always thought that that looked like upholstery fabric to me. Not a homemade sleeping bag. Maybe a sofa cover that he had found in an op shop.
Yes, I made a thread for him here in the UIDs. Cold, cold case.
That would be established by DNA. I don't think he was skeletal was he? Decomposing.Yes, I made a thread for him here in the UIDs. Cold, cold case. Just thinking, with no published name could be one of our First People?
Yes, I made a thread for him here in the UIDs. Cold, cold case.
ETA: Just thinking about the findings being handed down on Friday. With no published name could be one of our First People?
Not sure about names. I remember Ms Daley was first given the alias ‘Norma’ for her inquest. I can’t think of why someone wouldn’t at least have an alias or initials assigned to them unless they were an UID (which in this case they can’t be—it doesn’t make sense). Curious.Isn't it only photo's of their deceased that aren't permitted? I think names are fine.
OT Poor old Tumbulgum ManTumbulgum Man?
No, names as well, but it varies.Isn't it only photo's of their deceased that aren't permitted? I think names are fine.
So could be one of our First People then? I wonder if we’ll find out come next week or if the findings will be redacted.No, names as well, but it varies.
Mourning an Aboriginal death
I don't know. It's strange, there are a lot of suppressed names on that page, but replaced by initials. I can't think of any other reason for the unusual way of describing the deceased.So could be one of our First People then? I wonder if we’ll find out come next week or if the findings will be redacted.
It is unusual to have a missing, presumed deceased person’s name suppressed to the point where it doesn’t appear in any form. As you say, it’s strange. Well, I suppose there’s a first time for everything.I don't know. It's strange, there are a lot of suppressed names on that page, but replaced by initials. I can't think of any other reason for the unusual way of describing the deceased.
Well you know even then there could be evidence, for example shell natter? Etc?That would be established by DNA. I don't think he was skeletal was he? Decomposing.
So it is. See what? Where?So the 30th is today...
anyone see anything?
@Bohemian - was just thinking of the above...? did it link properly?
or here is a sample :
Friday 30 November 2018
Findings into the disappearance and suspected death of a missing person in Northern NSW
Cause and manner of death
State Coroner’s Court Glebe, courtroom 1 at 9.30am
Before Her Honour Magistrate Grahame, Deputy State Coroner
I don’t think it’s William’s inquest as it was slated to be held in the New Year. I doubt it was brought forward and his name and the location he disappeared from was redacted but, with all of the sensationalism being generated in some quarters of the community for their own ends, I would understand why the Coroner could feel it necessary to keep it under wraps.I have no idea. Seems early but...? @Bohemian
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.